Pragmatic politics focused on the public interest for those uncomfortable with America's two-party system and its way of doing politics. Considering the interface of politics with psychology, cognitive science, social behavior, morality and history.
Sunday, July 12, 2020
Rescinding my opinion…
Good day, all.
Regarding my OP from a few days ago on the SCOTUS' ruling on contraceptives, I've been thinking more about the conundrum. (Glad I'm not an SC justice. It'd drive me crazy(ier).)
I'm going to change my mind and say that the SC made the wrong decision: SCOTUS should not have given the green light for employers to deny their employees contraceptive coverage.
That coverage was previously a mandated part of the ACA’s provisions for such, and since employees were offered a “health care package,” employers can’t (or *shouldn’t*) start picking and choosing what they like and don’t like about it, principles-wise. Once that starts, there can be no end to discriminating for this, that, or the other thing. Seriously, what would be next? No meds for AIDS? For herpes or other STDs? Etc.?
I think I understand the religious factions’ objections. The thing about religion(s) is that they almost exclusively lie in the realm of the “unverifiable.” Claims of, say, their God being upset with them, or damning them to their Hell for being a “participant,” while real to them, cannot be verified. Though I don’t personally believe it, it’s just a/their point of view with no way to prove one way or the other. Objections on religious grounds lie in the realm of those dastardly Essentially Contested Concepts. If it could be proven that these negative things wouldn’t happen to them, then they would just be objecting on “personal grounds.” And a LOT of us object about a LOT of things, on (our) personal grounds. No end to that kind of thing either!
Anyway, contraceptive coverage is (or WAS) part of a h/c "package," under the ACA. If the religious had a problem with that, they could've always "blamed" the non-Christians for "making" them comply (complain to their God that they were coerced into complying). If their God still holds that against them, maybe time to look for a “more fair” God. ;)
A special thanks to larry motuz for insisting on making me think more about it. :)
Signed, "always second-guessing." ;(
No comments:
Post a Comment