Whew! Good thing they didn't include atheists in the groups -- we all know where those odious toads would rank -- presumably, the alt-right would rank itself at 100
An article in the San Diego Union-Tribune discusses the sources of hate.
Researchers have identified a number of powerful dynamics at work in the festering of hate, but at the core it is about identity and fear.
Psychological distress — a sense of meaningless that stems from anxious uncertainty — is a key stimulator driving someone to extreme political ideologies, whether it be the far right or left, according to an article published this year by the international Association for Psychological Science.
The argument goes hand-in-hand with the “significance-quest theory,” which says people become radicalized because they need to feel important and respected by supporting a meaningful cause.
“Distressing personal or societal events ... undermine the extent to which perceivers experience the world as meaningful and therefore stimulate people to regain a sense of purpose through strong and clear-cut ideological convictions,” according to the article’s authors, Netherlands academics Jan-Willem van Prooijen and Andre Krouwel.
This can lead to an oversimplified perception of the world, the authors said. “Feelings of distress prompt a desire for clarity, and extremist belief systems provide meaning to a complex social environment through a set of straightforward assumptions that make the world more comprehensible.”
This tendency to create a simplistic narrative to make sense of the world helps explain the popularity of conspiracy theories among political extremists.
Simplicity and overconfidence in their ideological positions turn into moral absolutes. “Such moral superiority implies that different values and beliefs — and the groups of people who endorse them — are considered morally inferior.”
That’s when intolerance takes hold.
White supremacist ideas become more relatable to a wider audience during periods of rapid social change, said Kevan Feshami, a doctoral candidate at University of Colorado Boulder studying white nationalist history and culture.
“It’s these ideas of social decline, that our traditions are not being kept up and our world is falling apart,” said Feshami.
Today’s white supremacist messaging focuses on perceived threats from a shifting demographic and resentment of calls to change societal and institutional systems that have historically favored whites.
In white supremacy propaganda, whites are the victims, not the haters.
“Hate is a mask that covers insecurities,” Schafer concluded from his research. “When we’re insecure, it’s typically because we fear something. Something threatens us.”
People who’ve accomplished important things — according to her or his own beliefs — can easily raise their self-esteem by internally comparing themselves to others, said Robert Sternberg, author of the book “The Psychology of Hate.”
“But some people have not accomplished much. So people can begin to derogate others to lift themselves up, even for no reasons others would consider valid,” said Sternberg, professor of human development at Cornell University and past president of the American Psychological Association. “Hate helps one do that. One artificially inflates oneself, one’s group, or whatever, and strengthens the self-inflation by hating those who don’t live up to one’s falsely created narrative.”
Which leads to another important dynamic: the desire to hate together.
The alt-right scored high on extreme distrust of mainstream media, strong support for Trump and strong support for collective action on behalf of whites, including agreement with statements such as “Whites need to start looking out more for one another” and “We need to do more to stop the mixing of the white race with other races,” according to the study.
The alt-right was also “more willing to dehumanize historically disadvantaged groups and groups that might politically oppose the alt-right.”
The study used a dehumanization model asking participants to rate on a sliding scale how evolved they view certain groups to be. The scale corresponds to images of a primate evolving into a man.
The alt-right found whites to be most evolved and viewed Muslims, feminists, journalists, Arabs, blacks and Mexicans as Neanderthal-like.
This research is new and the work needs to be replicated, confirmed and expanded. However, if these initial findings about the alt-right mindset are reasonably accurate, one can guess what government with them in charge would look like, i.e., good for most white people (but not those degenerate feminists and journalists) and less good for others.
A research paper the article refers to, A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right, is not yet through peer-review and changes may need to be made.
B&B orig: 7/22/19
