AI or human: which is best for politics?

Context

AI is an improved way to interface with computers. Instead of old-fashioned searching and sorting through to find what’s relevant, AI can do a lot of the sorting real fast. It helps a lot to learn how to word questions with some precision. Once hits come back in, one has to check to see that AI’s summary is accurate. It can get things wrong. One thing AI is terrible at is correctly quoting things. In my hands, it hallucinates far more often than it gets quotes right. In my posts, I never us a direct AI quote about anything unless I’ve confirmed the quote is exactly the same in the cited source.

AI is not conscious. The logic of that is personally compelling. Not surprisingly, a minority of philosophers of mind, neuroscientists, and AI researchers do think current or near‑term AI systems might be or could soon become conscious. In 1980, philosopher John Searle posited his Chinese Room thought experiment. That reasoning described why AI is not and cannot be conscious. Chinese Room logic says that a computer executing a program cannot have a mind, understanding, or consciousness, regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program makes the computer behave.

The machine can respond to Chinese input, but it doesn’t understand it

Political arguments from AI vs old-fashioned searches vs making it up

Too much of the rhetoric usually coming from Trump and MAGA demagogues is mostly either factually false or logically flawed. The demagoguery can come from intentional lies, deceit, or manipulation, or from bullshit. BS is rhetoric where the speaker or writer doesn’t care about being factually true or rationally coherent. The intent of BS is to persuade or manipulate, regardless of how untrue or irrational the speech might be. In general, Trump/MAGA rhetoric is often demagogic, manipulative, or systematically indifferent to truth, usually very hostile to inconvenient fact and truth. Link, link, link

An irrational MAGA argument that sometimes pops up is that content generated for political arguments by AI is crap that’s not worth consideration or a good faith response. The fatal flaw in that argument is that the same political arguments can be generated either by old-fashioned searching/sorting or by AI searching/sorting. What matters is the quality of content that is used from either way to prepare political arguments. AI search materials need to be checked and found to assert what the search results say, but when that is done the end product is What counts is the argument and sources it is based on, not how well the argument was vetted, checked for facts, unreasonable bias, and sound reasoning, and then presented.

In my experience, MAGA defenders in disagreement with me or other MAGA critics are usually unable to either (1) rationally defend their reasoning or opinions, or (2) show their versions of reality or facts are real and found in reliable info sources. When presented with inconvenient facts, truths and sound reasoning, the default MAGA response is mostly deflection, attacks on the messenger or criticizing the argument as based on lies, crackpot reasoning, or untrustworthy info sources. MAGA demagogues can and sometimes do criticize good faith but inconvenient, evidence- and reason-based arguments as generated by AI. In my experience, none of those demagogue criticisms of AI has ever said why AI cannot be trusted in ferreting out political arguments. If critics don’t specify why AI is unreliable, it’s a dodge and not a substantive critique.

The obvious reason the demagogues will not state why AI is unreliable is because it can be highly reliable. AI can be quite reliable in the hands of someone careful to vet what it turns up in searches. AI is a tool that helps people locate and summarize sources which the searcher then independently verifies. Usually experienced demagogues/propagandists don’t engage on the merits. They just say an argument is based on AI and therefore the search results are unreliable, even when the information sources the search turned up are vetted and cited. That is solid evidence of the bad faith that MAGA demagoguery and demagogues routinely operate in.

Qs: Are political arguments based on information that AI searches turn up no good because AI found and described the info sources? If AI searching is no good, what is better, old-fashioned searches and personal sorting, or just relying on things that are made up like most MAGA demagogues often do?

MAGA's racism

Pro-Trump rally by fine people (after the 1960s civil rights laws, they never rally for democrats)

By now, Trump and MAGA elites in power have an undeniable track record of bigotry and racism. MAGA’s newest authoritarian white supremacy move is going to have significant negative impacts on our economy and society. On May 21, a US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) memo weaponized the process of applying for a green card. The green card application process is called an adjustment of status request. In the past it was discretionary, but usually allowed if the green card applicant had no record of crimes or other problems in their past. MAGA’s new application process raises the bar so high that getting a green card is almost purely subjective.

Presumably, if an applicant, or the applicant’s prospective employer, can bribe Trump to meet the new “standard” for getting a green card. That probably won’t happen much for individual applicants because the jobs green card holders fill are mostly low wage. The employers will probably be the ones doing most of the bribing. Immigrants, including future green card holders, are disproportionately represented in agriculture, construction, hospitality, manufacturing, and transportation. Mass removal of workers in these sectors are projected to cut hundreds of thousands to over a million workers in each. Those are mostly jobs that American citizens will not take. Link, link

Economic and social impacts

Immigration is a key piece of Social Security’s long‑run solvency. Cutting legal immigration in half is estimated to worsen the program’s 75‑year actuarial deficit by ~25%. One estimate finds that reducing legal immigration levels by 50% would decrease GDP by 2% over twenty years, shrink long‑run growth by 12.5%, and cost millions of jobs. That will weaken tax bases for Social Security, Medicare, and state budgets. By contrast, issuing ~1 million authorized but unused green cards is projected to add about 1.08 trillion dollars to GDP over ten years. Those workers would contribute hundreds of billions in combined federal, state, and local revenue; denying those cards implies forgoing those gains. Link, link

In a world where green cards are mostly gone, many of those jobs will either be unfilled or shift toward more exploitation and under-the-table informality. Those low wage jobs would not be widely taken by US citizens at higher wages. A small subset of unfilled jobs would see wage increases, but nowhere near enough to absorb the full loss of legal permanent‑resident labor. Link, link

In its memo, USCIS refers to a green card or adjustment of status application as (1) a “matter of discretion and administrative grace”, and (2) an “extraordinary relief that permits applicants to dispense with the ordinary consular visa process”. Instead on applying in the US for a green card, applicants have to go back home and apply there. Since “extraordinary relief” isn’t defined, granting of a green card is purely subjective and discretionary. Green card holders are forced out of the US and given MAGA’s racist policy and track record, they probably won’t ever get back in. The memo supplies the legal‑bureaucratic scaffolding for a near‑shutoff of in‑country green cards if MAGA’s chain of command wants that outcome, which it does. Link, link

Bigotry & racism

Calling the policy “bigoted” is defensible in ordinary language. It’s just a part of MAGA’s overall pattern of excluding and devaluing specific racial, ethnic, and religious groups. That is how white supremacist MAGA uses state power over immigration as the enforcement mechanism. And, given the Trump/MAGA movement’s documented white‑nationalist rhetoric and the predictable racial impact of near‑total green‑card denials, this policy can reasonably be called a racist immigration policy. However, as we all now expect from MAGA propagandists, the new policy is phrased in race‑neutral legal language that deflects from the malice and true intent. Link, link, link

Q: Assuming that most rank & file MAGA voters are not racists or bigots, but they vote for Trump, white supremacist MAGA politicians, racists and bigots, what are they, innocent, deceived citizens or something else? Or, are Trump and MAGA elites neither bigoted nor racist?

Monopolize, Purge, Weaponize: Trump’s Three-Pronged Dictator War on Democracy

As is now clear to most reasonably attentive people of good faith with open minds, Trump and MAGA elites are hell-bent on establishing a kleptocratic dictatorship-oligarchy-bigoted Christian nationalist theocracy. America is well on its way to losing its democracy, rule of law and most of what’s left of civil liberties. Two moves by Trump exemplify the conversion of the US into a cesspit of authoritarian bigotry and corruption.

The app from MAGA hell

Government Executive reports that Trump has forced an aggressive MAGA propaganda app to be installed on all federal employee cell phones. Trump’s propaganda weapon, the “White House App”, is a direct way, in addition to demanding loyalty oaths, to further corrupt and politicize federal employees. Going forward, the civil service will be forced to deal with top‑down lies, slanders and authoritarian hate-mongering from Trump and elite MAGA propagandists. As an added bonus, the app’s security weaknesses include (1) silent JavaScript injection into third‑party sites, (2) location tracking every few minutes, and (3) oddly, data flowing to multiple for-profit third parties such as OneSignal, Mailchimp, Elfsight, etc., with dependency on a private developer’s GitHub for embedded content.** The security analysis concluded that MAGA propaganda and sleaze is the least alarming thing about the new app.

**  The private party embedded content problem comes from Trump’s app content being outsourced to an uncontrolled, un-vetted third‑party code source. That content could come from Putin, Satan, Iran, Israel, Melania, Jeff Epstein’s estate, Hunter Biden’s laptop, or anyone else because there’s no independent control on it. Well OK, maybe not Satan or Hunter’s laptop.

One can only wonder how much OneSignal, Mailchimp, Elfsight, etc. paid Trump to get preferred propaganda, sales and marketing access to our defenseless federal employees. Well OK, they’re Trump’s defenseless federal employees. They’re no longer ours. Regardless, this weaponized app is not a neutral IT tool. It’s a dictator-controlled presidential communications propaganda channel. It’s definitely an aggressive MAGA propaganda app.

Trump’s “Schedule Policy/Career” from hell

In other corrupt, bigoted Trump dictatorship news includes his Executive Order from Jan. 2025 regarding Schedule F. In his EO, he renamed Schedule F and now calls this purge, gut and loyalty effort Schedule Policy/Career. The policy under both names was and still is the same. Specifically, his this purge, gut and loyalty policy policy-related civil servants (experienced federal employees) out of the their service positions and gutted their civil service protections. That left Trump free to fire any federal employee for no reason whatsoever. Trump’s goal is obvious. he reclassifies about 50,000 federal employees, allowing mass firings of any perceived “disloyal” experts. They are to be replaced with corrupt, incompetent MAGA loyalist thugs. This is a common, well-known authoritarian patronage move. It’s a very popular tactic with tyrants, kleptocrats, and raging, brutal ideologues like elite racist Christian nationalist theocrats. Link, link

Very popular.

Dictators of a feather flock together

This Schedule Policy/Career dictatorship move is hidden behind and justified by a MAGA legal fiction called the “unitary executive”. That legal theory used to be fringe crackpot belief. But it now dominates among the six MAGA judges who control our now-authoritarian and kleptocratic US supreme court. The core idea is to directly undermine the now dying merit-based, politically neutral civil service built over the last century. It was built that way to limit and prevent spoils‑system abuses. Now there are powerful incentives for federal staff to demonstrate personal loyalty to Trump instead of loyalty to the law and the public interest. Link, link, link, link, link

Q: Do you approve of the kleptocratic dictator-oligarch-Christian bigot-theocrat regime that Trump and MAGA elites are turning America into, or (a) is it no big deal because both parties are more or less the same, or (b) America has not been any kind of a democracy for a while, if ever?

But they voted for and supported him anyway

The Reductio Ad Absurdum: They Were Going to Install Ahmadinejad!

Regular readers of this blog know I have spent considerable time documenting the weaponization of antisemitism accusations as a tool for suppressing dissent, defunding universities, deporting students, and blacklisting academics. I have traced the organizational infrastructure behind it — the think tanks, the donor networks, the legal strategies, the federal enforcement pipeline — in detail that I won't rehearse here.

But sometimes history hands you something so perfectly, catastrophically self-refuting that extended analysis feels almost beside the point. This is one of those moments.

According to a May 19th report in the New York Times, the original Israeli war plan brought to Donald Trump — the one he enthusiastically endorsed and that has so far killed thousands of civilians, triggered a Strait of Hormuz crisis, and sent inflation surging — included a cornerstone political objective: the rehabilitation and installation of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a pliable pro-Western puppet to lead post-war Iran.

Yes. That Ahmadinejad.

The man who called the Holocaust a "myth." The man who hosted an international Holocaust denial conference in Tehran. The man who — and this is not a paraphrase, mistranslation, or decontextualized slogan, but a direct, unambiguous policy statement — said Israel should be "wiped off the map." The man who is, by any serious measure, the most prominent state-level antisemite and Holocaust denier of the 21st century.

We were told Iran was "the head of the snake" — the controlling force behind Hamas and Hezbollah, the existential threat requiring military confrontation. Maybe so. But when you decapitate a snake, the stated goal is presumably something better. Liberation, perhaps. Democracy. The protesters in the streets of Tehran who actually despise the theocracy — the ones Trump occasionally invoked as "our friends, citizens of a great civilization." Surely the plan was to empower them? So we were told in Trump's speech and Netanyahu's right after the first bombs fell in Iran. Wasn't that the plan?

No. The plan was Ahmadinejad. A man so compromised, so despised — in Iran, in the West, in the Arab world, among Iranians in diaspora — that no American anti-Zionist activist, no Palestinian solidarity organizer, no campus protest group would go near him under any circumstances. The people being surveilled and deported wouldn't touch this man with a ten-foot pole. The people doing the surveilling were planning to install him as head of state.

 

That man was to be brought out of house arrest through "light bombing," rehabilitated on the world stage, and installed as the US-Israeli client of choice for a post-regime-change Iran.

Let's sit with that for a moment.

For the past two years, the federal government has been surveilling Jewish Voice for Peace members, deporting graduate students on student visas for attending protests, threatening to defund Harvard and Columbia, and designating "From the River to the Sea" a genocidal antisemitic slogan requiring federal enforcement action. Canary Mission dossiers — compiled by an anonymous far-right blacklisting organization — were fed directly to federal "Tiger Team" agents investigating 5,000+ protesters. Mahmoud Khalil was detained. Rumeysa Ozturk was detained. Faculty have been fired. Entire DEI offices have been dismantled under the banner of fighting antisemitism.

And it turns out that the architects of this campaign were negotiating the rehabilitation of a Holocaust denier they planned to seat in Tehran as their man.

The contrast does not require elaboration. It is its own argument.

"From the River to the Sea" — a phrase whose meaning is genuinely contested among scholars and whose users include Israeli leftists, Palestinians, and international human rights advocates — is treated as an actionable antisemitic threat warranting deportation.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — Holocaust denier, Israel-elimination advocate, architect of state antisemitism as explicit government policy — was to be the vehicle for American-Israeli regional order.

The students were the threat. The Holocaust denier was the plan.

If the goal were actually fighting antisemitism, this would be incoherent. But of course, fighting antisemitism was never the goal. The goal was suppressing dissent against a military and political project. Antisemitism was the instrument — the legal hook, the rhetorical bludgeon, the mechanism for turning "I oppose this war" into "you are a threat to Jewish safety."

The Ahmadinejad revelation doesn't just expose hypocrisy. It exposes the entire apparatus as a fraud. Not a well-intentioned overcorrection. Not a blunt instrument deployed with good faith. A fraud — one in which the people most loudly claiming to protect Jews from eliminationist antisemitism were simultaneously negotiating with its living embodiment.

I have written before about how the "new antisemitism" framework functions not as a sincere moral category but as an enforcement mechanism — one whose application correlates not with actual antisemitic content but with political inconvenience to Israeli state policy. This story is the proof of concept.

You cannot simultaneously deport a Tufts PhD student for a co-signed newspaper op-ed and negotiate the installation of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Not if antisemitism is what you actually care about.

But you can do both, perfectly consistently, if what you actually care about is power.