Etiquette



DP Etiquette

First rule: Don't be a jackass. Most people are good.

Other rules: Do not attack or insult people you disagree with. Engage with facts, logic and beliefs. Out of respect for others, please provide some sources for the facts and truths you rely on if you are asked for that. If emotion is getting out of hand, get it back in hand. To limit dehumanizing people, don't call people or whole groups of people disrespectful names, e.g., stupid, dumb or liar. Insulting people is counterproductive to rational discussion. Insult makes people angry and defensive. All points of view are welcome, right, center, left and elsewhere. Just disagree, but don't be belligerent or reject inconvenient facts, truths or defensible reasoning.

Monday, July 13, 2026

MAGA approves night sky destruction; public interest is ignored

Mirrors in space for fun & profit

In another indication of MAGA’s contempt for the public interest and service to special interests and their profits, which includes a livable environment, Trump’s FCC (Federal Communications Commission) has given approval for a company to start wreaking havoc on the night sky. This is another example of Trump and MAGA elites doing whatever they or Trump want to do, no matter how toxic or even lethal it might be to the public interest.

Just the facts, not the context

The FCC: As usual, the MSM’s reporting rigidly sticks to the facts, which are alone are quite ugly. That allows reporting to completely ignore the far more important uglier context in which the US government has green-lighted development of night sky destruction over the entire planet. Before Trump and MAGA elites converted it to a service operation for for-profit special interests, the FCC was an agency that served the public interest. Those days are over. The FCC will stay corrupted as long as Trump and MAGA elites control government, and maybe a lot longer than that.

Much of the MSM does not connect environmental risks to the FCC’s use of categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) or to the broader pattern of environmental review being bypassed for orbital systems. NEPA requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of actions they carry out, fund, or license, and to consider alternatives and public input — that was ignored. The FCC classified the system as communications infrastructure and thereby avoided any environmental impact assessment. MSM reporting is mostly a balanced “critics fear X, agency says Y” narrative. That ignores the fact that environmental concerns and public input were excluded from MAGA’s decision‑making.

Polluting the night sky with sunlight: The company is called Reflect Orbital. Its for-profit plan is to put at least 50,000 fridge-sized satellites in orbit. Mirrors about 60×60 ft will unfold and where light is reflected down to will be controlled by light buyers. The plan is to make money by reflecting sunlight light for solar farms, big rescue operations, city street lighting, crop growth, big festivals, annoying the neighbors**, and Dog only knows what defense uses the military can dream up. Reflect Orbital will sell to any crackpot, group, company or government that can afford to pay. One gets sunlight by logging into a website, paying $5,000/mirror/hour (~3‑mile‑wide patch of light from 1 mirror), inputting the GPS coordinates, and then waiting for sunlight after dark. No one knows how big the market will be for sure, but there is marketing hype. Link, link, link, link, link

** OK, that one was just made up, but it is possible

Shafting the public interest – the MSM squeaks defense: In addition to confusing plants and animals about what time of year it is, the reflected light will scatter and generally make the night sky even brighter than it is now. The MSM reports squeaks of objection like (1) an expert claiming that this “cannot be considered to serve the public interest”, (2) this wastes tax dollars by wrecking federally funded astronomical facilities, (3) doing Dog only knows what to people, plants and wildlife.

The business & political reality – this is isn’t what it seems: Two different very things are going on here, both of which stink. One is Reflect Orbital running a Ponzi scheme or something akin to that to scam investors. Buying 1 mirror for $5,000 for 1 hour gets you a spot of light ~3 miles in diameter. The light intensity in that spot is low, about equal to 4 full moons on a clear night. That is light intensity is ~10-fold lower than typical city street lighting. That is not enough to do much of anything other than (1) confuse plans and animals, (2) screw up the night sky for serious astronomy work, and (3) maybe annoy annoying neighbors if that’s the goal. Ripping off investors in a pump and dump operation makes sense. Selling weak sunlight for serious uses makes no sense.

The marketing propaganda on this is what you would expect. People and institutions trying to cash in on this lunacy say things like, “we’re experimenting with a potentially groundbreaking clean‑energy technology”. Whew, that sounds respectable. Investors can tell themselves they are visionaries in “space climate tech”, even if Reflect Orbital goes bankrupt. By contrast, saying “this is a ridiculous, harmful nutjob project enabled by captured regulation” (in this case, our corrupted, anti-public interest FCC) sounds activist or woke. That’s bad, really bad.

So that stinks. Investor damage will be mostly limited to people who get ripped off. Whatever environmental damage there would be cannot be predicted. The company will probably fizzle out long before 50,000 mirrors are put in orbit, which would limit collateral damage to the environment. At least one can hope that’s the outcome.

The very big stink

The far bigger, much worse stink that’s going on is directly related to Trump and his MAGA authoritarianism and kleptocracy. That’s where the real rubber hits the road. The FCC greenlighting this operation has massive implications that facilitate future extremely bad things happening. This is a tragedy of the commons story. This FCC approval established a US agency signing off on space‑based lighting as “communications infrastructure” with no environmental review and no public comment. That approval moved the Overton window for any future scheme that relies on screwing up the night sky for profit or authoritarian purposes. From this, special interests and authoritarian MAGA government can pivot from “solar at night” to advertising, defense purposes, or data‑linked services (1) without asking for authority over the commons (the night sky), or (2) any environmental or public interest impact assessment whatsoever. This FCC approval was made in secret. Future approvals will be the same.

The real “product” is arguably not light, but orbital rights. This is precedent that private interests can take and use low Earth orbit to alter planetary lighting for paying customers. That is an asset that can be traded, repurposed, or taken over by other actors if Reflect Orbital flops. The public has nothing to say about it.

Q1: Can one reasonably argue that this scheme isn’t crackpot from the standpoint of people trying to financialize and profit from the sky, i.e., is it a rational extraction scheme from a system that pays for investor upside and treats planetary damages and the damaged public interest as society’s problem?

Q2: If this space mirrors scheme is treated as “smoke and mirrors” because the physics and economics of the advertised use case are crap, is that crappy reality sufficient to con regulators, journalists, and investors while corporate interests get solid claims on a planetary commons at our expense?

Info links:

A Sun that Never Sets – Reflect Orbital’s Big Plans for Upending Solar Energy

California startup’s plan to sell sunlight at night sparks controversy

FCC Authorization — Permission given as in the public interest in emergent innovative “communications” technology that promotes new services and economic growth (that is misleading and bad‑faith, arguably a lie); The FCC says that light, astronomy, health, and environmental harms fall outside the Commission’s remit over radio spectrum and thus are not valid bases for denial (the same)

FCC approves space mirror satellite — and bypassed environmental review to do it

California startup pitches 50,000 space reflectors to extend daylight

Sunday, July 12, 2026

Trump’s joke-to-policy tactic isn’t a joke


Over at Rick Wilson’s Against All Enemies anti-autocracy substack, Wilson nicely articulates how Trump and the MAGA demagoguery machine con people into accepting tyranny and corruption. His essay, The Coming Election Takeover, is another warning about what Trump and MAGA elites want to do to the 2026 midterm and later elections if they can pull it off. The joke-to-policy tactic has been seen multiple times. The tactic plays out generally like this:

  1. In his public rants or social media posts, Trump floats an extreme, anti-democratic, anti-rule of law idea or anti-civil liberties idea. This signals his intent and the goal of the threat.
  2. Authoritarian MAGA media characterizes his extremism and pro-tyranny intentions as just innocent jokes that are misunderstood or taken out of context. People who can’t see the threat as a joke are dismissed as humorless, irrational, mentally defective, or “snowflakes” who can’t take a joke. MAGA rejects criticisms out of hand as nonsense or bad faith smears. That allows MAGA to avoid dealing with legitimate criticisms of real anti-democracy threats.
  3. MAGA propaganda then spins the threat as Trump having made a good, legitimate point.
  4. Then there is an Executive Order or bill in congress.
  5. Then Trump’s anti-democracy/anti-rule of law/anti-civil liberties threat becomes policy or law and the new norm from with to launch further MAGA tyranny attacks.

Wilson describes the process like this: “The MAGA media apparatus of Fox, Newsmax, CBS, the Twitter-poisoned podcast bros, and the MAGA Influencer-Industrial Complex fan out to tut-tut the horrified for being humorless scolds. He was kidding. You people are unhinged. Touch grass. Then, a beat later: well, he was kidding, but you have to admit he has a point. Then, a draft executive order leaks. Then it’s policy. Then it’s the law. Then it’s the new floor, and the next joke starts the cycle again, one rung lower”.

Regarding elections

Wilson points out that Trump has used joke-to-policy to attack the 2026 mid-term elections. First Trump says something outrageous like “maybe we shouldn’t have an election”. MAGA media propaganda frames it as either an unserious joke or raising a good point. Clearly, that was no joke. Then lawyers and politicians start drafting ways to translate the autocratic attack into practice. Ways to do that include Trump (1) issuing Executive Orders, (2) claiming and emergency and emergency powers, and (3) deploying his federal enforcers (ICE, FBI, etc.) or investigators (DOJ, etc.). For 2026, the joke-to-policy cycle is aimed at creating a legal and administrative framework to allow Trump’s team to disregard or override state-run election outcomes. The point of that kind of attack is to allow anti-election policy implementation with few or no lawsuits or court interventions.

Q1: Is the joke-to-policy argument mostly or completely false, or is it reasonably accurate in view of the evidence in the public record?

Q2: By treating serious objections to Trump’s tyrannical or corrupt threats as a failure to appreciate humor, (1) does MAGA rhetoric deflect from answering substantive criticism, (2) which turns politics into a culture war over who is “in on the joke” versus who is an unreasonable uptight enemy, or a humorless snowflake or crackpot?

Info sources:

“MAGA ‘secret’ exposed by ex-GOP operative as Republicans watch their ‘numbers go south’.”

‘Packaging evil into something funny’: is making fun of Trump now just ‘clownwashing’?

Jacob Neiheisel on How Trump Uses Humor and Labels to Divide

A timeline of Donald Trump’s election denial claims, which Republican politicians increasingly embrace

In MAGA world, Trump’s jokes always land

The corruption of MAGA comedy — The cruelty and crassness of Donald Trump’s dark sense of humor is quickly spreading

How humor and ‘dark play’ radicalize Trump’s voter base

Friday, July 10, 2026

Trump guts federal election integrity while our oblivious or complicit MSM rearranges the deck chairs

Another boat sinker iceberg is MAGA's rigged elections


What Trump and MAGA elites mean by “election integrity”

Various sources are reporting that Trump has just fired all EAC (Election Assistance Commission) commissioners. The EAC is within the larger FEC (Federal Elections Commission). That anti-election integrity move comes on top of Trump previously neutering the entire FEC by blocking appointment of commissioners. That left the FEC without a quorum and thus powerless to much of anything within the scope of its powers.

Without any commissioners to run the FEC, that federal agency is no longer capable of policing corruption and crimes by special interest money buying elections or politicians by any means that might meaningfully influence an election. The killing off of the EAC ends federal assistance for states to run and coordinate free and fair elections.

In the recent authoritarian MAGA USSC Trump v. Slaughter decision, the court gave Trump unlimited power to fire anyone in the executive branch for any or no reason. The firings of the EAC commissioners is fully protected by the new authoritarian power the USSC just gave Trump.

In other words, it is now perfectly legal for Trump to steer the ship of American democracy straight into huge icebergs of tyranny and corruption. MAGA’s goal is obvious. Sink the whole damned American experiment in a poisoned sea of tyranny and corruption by, e.g., subverting elections, starting with the 2026 midterm elections. This is what Trump, MAGA elites and their predecessors have always meant by “election integrity”. Now we have MAGA-style election integrity, whether we want it or not.

Not defending democracy and the rule of law isn’t harmless, it’s extremely harmful

The MSM’s worse than crappy reporting

One of the major systemic damages that Trump and MAGA elites and their radical right authoritarian predecessors have targeted is the MSM. Intelligent reporting is mostly gone. It has been replaced by Switzerland-style milquetoast neutrality. Most of the MSM no longer acts as if it gives a s#*t about what happens to us or our democracy, rule of law and civil liberties. The MSM has collapsed into a state almost total structural failure.

How can anyone rationally argue that MSM reporting about Trump and MAGA tyranny, corruption, and democracy-killing is neutral? Easy peasy. Here’s how. The structural failure here is that most MSM outlets are narrating democratic backsliding. The outlets are not sounding a civic alarm anywhere close to the actual risk of tyranny that isolated pockets of fact reporting fail to convey. What’s happening with the gutting of the EAC and related agencies illustrates how the MSM dutifully records the institutional damage, sometimes calling it “extraordinary”, gasp! ðŸ˜±, but they do not come close to treating it as the critical constitutional or democracy emergency it actually is. What Trump and MAGA elites are doing is not extraordinary. It is catastrophic! That’s far beyond the MSM’s milquetoast extraordinary.

Why is MSM reporting neutral? There are multiple reasons. One is that political reporters are trained into “balance,” sourcing from both parties and avoiding explicit normative claims. Even when one actor is clearly attacking democracy or elections, and degrading rule‑of‑law institutions, the default MSM frame is “ this is just a controversial move,” not “this is authoritarian tyranny attacking democracy and elections”. That is a huge problem. In my opinion it’s a major source of MSM failure.

Also, there is some fear/threat-inspired CSI syndrome (complicity, stupidity, incompetence) going on. Some reporters, opinionators and editors really do believe they are doing a good job by reporting facts but stopping short of connecting MAGA’s tyranny and corruption fact dots. Some are quietly or openly complicit. The dots are scattered all over the entire freaking MSM ecosystem. Connecting them is what Trump and MAGA elites hate and oppose. It takes a lot of effort to do that. Apparently, Trump and MAGA elites have threatened or scared the MSM’s dot-connecting job into almost complete oblivion.

And of course, there’s money and the profit motive. MSM outlets cannot survive without sufficient revenue. Trump and MAGA elites know that and apply pressure, in addition to pressure from advertisers. Trump has retaliated through denying access, regulatory threats, and public vilification. That is intentional. Threats and vilification put pressure on MSM self‑censorship. It forces the MSM to hedge in how far to go, if any at all, beyond the bare descriptive fact minimums. Collectively, the extremely powerful, always present profit motive and MAGA threats are always there pressuring to kill off the MSM’s dot-connecting duty. In other words, there are powerful incentives for the MSM to not do its damned job properly. So, it doesn’t. This is like falling off a log — MSM failure is not rocket science, it’s capitalism.

The gigantic gap between MSM’s neutral descriptions of MAGA’s ghastly democratic and rule of law damage coupled with the its lack of urgent alarm is what a person can call “neutrality”. As discussed here, such an assessment is opinion based on (1) the totality of the facts and truths I am aware of, and (2) application of my good faith, sound reasoning to those facts and truths. That is from the point of view of someone who staunchly supports secular, pluralistic democracy, the rule of law and civil liberties. So yes of course, opinions will and do differ a lot. But the reasons for seeing abject MSM failure and even complicity is open for everyone to assess for themselves. Some will see it, others will not.

Q1: Is Trump firing the EAC commissioners and neutering the entire FEC for unspecified election integrity reasons true, or is that just lies and the face of rising corruption and tyranny in America under Trump and MAGA elites?

Q2: Is it the job of the MSM to connect the dots for us, or is there some moral, rational or other justification to not do that, while sitting on the sidelines and sticking with Switzerland-style neutrality?

Info sources:

In sweeping attack on elections, Trump fires leadership of key federal voting assistance commission

Trump Administration Fires Members of Independent Election Group — “The firings and a resignation render the Election Assistance Commission useless. The moves come as President Trump seeks to impose control over how ballots will be counted in the midterms.”

As of Thursday, the FEC Can’t Enforce Campaign Finance Laws — and That’s Only One of Its Problems

Dismantling of federal efforts to monitor election interference creates opening for foreign meddling

Trump fires Election Assistance Commission members ahead of midterms

The Media and the Ballot Box: Confronting 21st Century Voter Suppression

US Democracy Is in Danger and Mainstream Media Is Silent

U.S. Corporate Media Fails to Call Out GOP Voter Suppression Campaign

Why Do Mainstream Media Sugarcoat Trump’s Attacks on Democracy?

What the Media Missed

What The Mainstream Media Got Wrong About The 2024 Election

Thursday, July 9, 2026

About the Democrats and their messes

With Graham Plattner's crash & burn flameout in Maine, the Dems take another hit. What a colossal mess. But MAGA propagandists are ecstatic. MAGA media is using Platner’s implosion to argue that Democrats and the radical left are morally bankrupt hypocrites who protect their own predators and Nazis with tattoos while pretending to be the party of women, decency, and anti‑racism. MAGA’s demagoguery is framed as proof that liberal criticism of Trump, Kavanaugh, Gaetz, etc. was just cynical power politics, not principled opposition.


The gatekeeper function failed
Well, sometimes a big flameout happens when a party throws its support to a candidate the party did not properly vet. I recall the same thing happening in San Diego years ago when the Dem Party supported Dem congressman and sex predator Bob Filner for mayor. He got elected and then had to resign over sex scandals that went on for years. What a colossal mess. Apparently the Dems are either just too damned stupid or too damned incompetent to learn from their messes. Arguably too damned arrogant too.

I know, I know, the people should choose, not the party. I get it. But do most voters do serious opposition research on candidates? Hell no they don't. They can't. The bad stuff people need to know is hidden as much as possible. Did most Trump voters know he was a failure as a businessman because he was forced to file for bankruptcy 5 or 6 times? No. Most probably still don't know that. The ones that have heard that fact either say it's either a big fat lie or no big deal if it is true.


Where gatekeeping matters
It's useful to know that the two parties are very different about sex scandals. The Dems usually sacrifice their own . . . . . eventually. We all remember Eric Swalwell's recent flameout in California. 

A NYT article (not paywalled), Does a Sex Assault Claim Kill a Political Career? It Depends., points out the huge difference. Dems sacrifice their sex scandal perps, but the Repubs usually defend theirs and lie and deny their bad guys did anything wrong. Trump is the poster boy for sleazy sex scandals that most Repubs forgive and/or forget. Their bad sex stuff tends to be denied or downplayed. Trump won in 2016 after the accusations of at least a half-dozen women who said he groped or forcibly kissed them. He denied every one allegation. And, he then denied all sexual improprieties alleged against Brett Kavanaugh, RFK Jr. and Pete Hegseth. A vast majority of his party did the same. Each accused Republican sleazebag denied the accusations and got rewarded with real power.

And, the Epstein files. Epstein files, Epstein files, Epstein files, . . . . . . 


Messaging matters too
A NYT editorial board opinion (not paywalled), The Democrats Can’t Go On Like This, raises a common criticism about the Dem Party: "Democrats do need fresh, charismatic, younger contenders, and they should stop treating the next name in line as an entitlement. .... What is the party’s answer on immigration, moving beyond its proper outrage at President Trump’s methods to include an affirmative account of who should be allowed in and how? What would it do about the cost of housing, beyond lamenting it and suggesting inadequate fixes? What does it want from the public education system?"

In other words, the editors are arguing that Dem messaging sucks. Well, duh. That has been true and obvious for years. 

Apparently, the Dem party correctly thinks that Washington is broken, but incorrectly believes that nothing can be done. Why stage a fight over specifics that will exposes divisions? But that's backward. Democrats still believe government can work. They just haven't yet clearly and concretely articulated exactly what they would try to do. Vagueness in messaging to say doesn’t make the Dems look unified. It makes it look as if they have nothing to say. They surrender policy debate to authoritarian MAGA propaganda.

The NYT editors argue that Platner’s appeal was that he seemed to stand for something. Maybe he did. He was angry on voters’ behalf about an economy that is rigged for the powerful. He was blunt about saying so. Voters in Maine responded to that. Now he's gone, and the idiot dinosaur Susan Collins will be very likely re-elected for another 6 years of incompetence and support for MAGA tyranny and corruption. 

What a mess.