Etiquette



DP Etiquette

First rule: Don't be a jackass. Most people are good.

Other rules: Do not attack or insult people you disagree with. Engage with facts, logic and beliefs. Out of respect for others, please provide some sources for the facts and truths you rely on if you are asked for that. If emotion is getting out of hand, get it back in hand. To limit dehumanizing people, don't call people or whole groups of people disrespectful names, e.g., stupid, dumb or liar. Insulting people is counterproductive to rational discussion. Insult makes people angry and defensive. All points of view are welcome, right, center, left and elsewhere. Just disagree, but don't be belligerent or reject inconvenient facts, truths or defensible reasoning.

Friday, October 22, 2021

A Reluctant "Hot Take"

I don't like "hot takes." They're easy. Especially when you're already outside of the mainstream zeitgeist, it's a waste of time to actually have to go looking for ways to undercut a circulating grand narrative.


I almost didn't post this here because of it. There is a lot of blame for Republicans at this blog. Understandably so, because they are the source of so much that is wrong with our society.


However, "evil" - or perhaps more specifically the forces of self-interest over community - they will always be with us. They are a known quantity. It's a given.

But meanwhile, Democrats let the states fall one by one to Republican gerrymandering for decades by ignoring it. Now state legislatures are far redder than their constituents.

Democrats let the Republicans run roughshod over senate rules while unilaterally disarming in the face of it, allowing Republicans to pack the courts with lunatics from the Federalist Society.

Democrats let the Republicans control the senate as a minority power because their leadership still thinks this is Queensbury Rules instead of war. Mitch McConnell is sending Sinema and Manchin fruit baskets. Prove me wrong.

When fascism sweeps away our vote in any meaningful sense by 2026, you can blame the "good men" who stood by and let it happen.


I'm out.

Republicans woo an exciting new interest group! Tax cheat felons

Based on 2013 data


Well, not really. But it is an exciting old interest group. The FRP (fascist Republican Party) has been on the side of tax cheats at least since the early 2000s, but in the early days it was more bipartisan. Now, a split is growing between the FRP and Democratic Party on the issue of letting tax cheats get away with it. The Washington Post writes[1]:
These unpaid taxes — often called the “tax gap” — are predominantly owed by wealthy individuals. The richest 1 percent alone duck an estimated $163 billion in income taxes each year.

There are some types of income, however, for which little or no third-party reporting exists. These income categories — including partnership, proprietorship and rental income — accrue disproportionately to high earners. The government has much less ability to tell when these filers are misreporting; as a result, they can more easily get away with cheating.

When it comes to ordinary wage and salary income, taxpayers are remarkably forthcoming, with noncompliance averaging only 1 percent; for those more “opaque” income sources, noncompliance is an estimated 55 percent.

A more effective response would involve more of that third-party reporting so the IRS has greater visibility into who’s likely fudging their numbers. Then the agency could better target its audit decisions.

More reporting would also deter would-be tax cheats from fudging in the first place, because they’d know they’re more likely to get caught.

This solution is exactly what Democrats have proposed as part of their big budget bill.

The reporting proposal is estimated to bring in $200 billion to $250 billion in revenue over the next decade, according to Treasury.

This is revenue that would be collected without having to raise a single tax rate, which you’d think Republicans would applaud. Instead, the GOP, backed by the bank lobby, has fought every version of the reporting policy tooth and nail.
Once again, the priorities of the players are obvious and undeniable. The Democratic Party wants to reduce tax cheating. The FRP want to protect it, presumably because rich people who cheat on their taxes tend to be Republicans. And banks, in their unquenchable lust for profit, want to maintain rich people tax cheating in as much secrecy as possible. That helps them keep those tax felons as rich customers. In none of that is there any apparent concern for the public interest or the rule of law.

This is an example of the inherently anti-democratic and anti-rule of law nature of corruption. Corruption has a lot of raw power and it fights to maintain and grown itself, democracy, the rule of law and the public interest be damned. The is sooo damn much money in corruption, who can resist?


Questions: Of these three forces or power sources, (i) dark free speech, (ii) unwarranted opacity or secrecy, and (iii) corruption, which one feels to you like it is the most dangerous to democracy, the public interest and the rule of law, or are these power sources too intertwined or complex to have a feel for which one is worst and least worst. Or, are none of those three significant threats to democracy, the public interest or the rule of law?


Footnote: 
1. The WaPo cites a recent US Treasury document that asserts that the net tax gap (what is owed minus what is paid) amounts to ~$600 billion/year. I believe that is a gross understatement. Two different recent assertions by knowledgeable experts were ~$1 trillion/year and ~1.4 trillion/year. IMO, the annual tax gap is a lot closer to ~$1.2 trillion than the Treasury assertion of ~$600 billion. Regardless of what it is, the tax gap is gigantic and the FRP is fighting tooth and claw to keep it as big as they can. It does that to serve its own interests, i.e., power and wealth above all other concerns and interests.

Republican cult RINO hunts get serious

criticism and dissent than Democrats:
"A 63% majority of Republicans say their party should be not too (32%) or not at all (30%) accepting of elected officials who openly criticize Trump, according to the new survey. Just 36% of Republicans say the GOP should be very (11%) or somewhat (26%) accepting of officials who do so.

By contrast, about six-in-ten Democrats say the Democratic Party should be very (17%) or somewhat accepting (40%) of Democratic elected officials who openly criticize President Joe Biden."


The New York Times reports that ideological cleansing and loyalty demands in the FRP (fascist Republican Party) leadership are intensifying:
A prominent Washington lobbyist close to Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader, is warning Republican political consultants that they must choose between working for Representative Liz Cheney or Mr. McCarthy, an ultimatum that marks the full rupture between the two House Republicans.

Jeff Miller, the lobbyist and a confidant of Mr. McCarthy’s dating to their youthful days in California politics, has conveyed this us-or-her message to Republican strategists in recent weeks, prompting one fund-raising firm to disassociate itself from Ms. Cheney, a Republican from Wyoming.

In response, The Morning Group, a fund-raising firm she hired to help prepare for a primary next year against a challenger endorsed by former President Donald J. Trump, informed her last month they could no longer work on her campaign, according to Republicans familiar with the matter.  
After she joined the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack, organized by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Mr. McCarthy called Ms. Cheney and another dissident on the panel “Pelosi Republicans.”  
“She’s not just undermining Kevin but the whole G.O.P. conference,” Mr. Miller said of Ms. Cheney. “You’re either with Kevin, and the conference, or the person undermining them. You can’t serve two masters.”
For the FRP, it appears that loyalty to party is more important than loyalty to democracy, truth and the public interest. That arguably reflects the anti-democratic authoritarianism, fascism IMO, that dominates the FRP. To my knowledge, the Democrats do not engage in DINO hunts or ideological cleansing to an extent even remotely close to what the FRP demands. That is why there are staunch conservatives like Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema in the Democratic Party. One does not find anything close to a Bernie Sanders in the FRP, that's for sure.


Questions: 
1. Is it mostly accurate to see ideological cleansing and party loyalty demands by the congressional FRP leadership as (i) ideological cleansing or loyalty demands, or (ii) inherently anti-democratic and pro-authoritarian?

2. Is Miller's assertion that in the FRP, one cannot serve two masters if one of the masters is loyalty to democracy, truth and the public interest and the other is the FRP itself? In other words, is service to the Republican Party at least mostly incompatible with how its leadership views party loyalty and with democracy, truth and the public interest? 

3. Is it mostly accurate to see the Republican Party as more authoritarian than democratic, more dismissive of inconvenient truth than accepting, and/or more party and special interest-centered than public interest-centered than the Democratic Party?