Pragmatic politics focused on the public interest for those uncomfortable with America's two-party system and its way of doing politics. Considering the interface of politics with psychology, cognitive biology, social behavior, morality and history.
Etiquette
Sunday, April 14, 2024
Sabine Hossenfelder criticizes academia and irrational constraining dogma
GOP authoritarian moral rot; Wine improves with age; Talking to the flock; Israel vs Iran
Looking back, it’s clear that one of the more fateful moments in the evolution of today’s Republican Party came when Kevin McCarthy made his abject pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago three weeks after January 6, 2021. This was, in essence, Donald Trump’s public absolution, with then-GOP leader McCarthy affirming that the Republican Party would make the construction of a monumental historical lie about the insurrection central to its identity for the foreseeable future.*
The infernal plan was to recast what was the largest outbreak of stateside political violence in memory as a just cause—while transforming the insurrectionists into victims and martyrs. By doing so, McCarthy would keep Trump and his movement safely in the Republican Party fold, ensuring the GOP electoral victories that could not be conceived of without their participation.All of which set the stage for Mike Johnson’s groveling meeting with Trump at Mar-a-Lago on Friday. Billed as an event about “election integrity,” their press conference confirmed that the GOP remains as committed as ever to their disturbing post-insurrection path.
It was a deeply weird affair. With Trump hovering watchfully over Johnson, the House Speaker said that in campaigning, he’s discovered that people across the country just happen to be thoroughly obsessed with precisely the same thing that preoccupies Trump. “Everywhere we go, one of the first questions that people ask about is this issue of election integrity,” Johnson said.
Johnson and Trump also announced that the House will pursue a new bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote. Johnson even rattled off a convoluted theory in which non-citizens are threatening our elections by the “design” of President Biden—a soft version of the “great replacement theory” that has become mainstreamed at the highest levels of Republican and MAGA establishment power.
Jerry Dean McLain first bet on former president Donald Trump’s Truth Social two years ago, buying into the Trump company’s planned merger partner, Digital World Acquisition, at $90 a share. Over time, as the price changed, he kept buying, amassing hundreds of shares for $25,000 — pretty much his “whole nest egg,” he said.
That nest egg has lost about half its value in the past two weeks as Trump Media & Technology Group’s share price dropped from $66 after its public debut last month to $32 on Friday. But McLain, 71, who owns a tree-removal service outside Oklahoma City, said he’s not worried. If anything, he wants to buy more.“I know good and well it’s in Trump’s hands, and he’s got plans,” he said. “I have no doubt it’s going to explode sometime.”
For shareholders like McLain, investing in Truth Social is less a business calculation than a statement of faith in the former president and the business traded under his initials, DJT.
Even the company’s plunging stock price — and the chance their investments could get mostly wiped out — doesn’t seem to have shaken that faith. The company has lost $3.5 billion in value since its public debut last month.
As a business, Trump Media has largely underwhelmed: The company lost $58 million last year on $4 million in revenue, less than the average Chick-fil-A franchise, even as it paid out millions in executive salaries, bonuses and stock.
And in two years, Truth Social has attracted a tiny fraction of the traffic other platforms see, according to estimates from the analytics firm Similarweb — one of the only ways to measure its performance, given that the company says it “does not currently, and may never, collect, monitor or report certain key operating metrics used by companies in similar industries.”
Friday, April 12, 2024
Biden is dragging America into war with Iran on behalf of Israel
by Trita Parsi
Exec. VP at Quincy Institute
Ask your doctor (or psychologist) if this post is right for you…
This original post (OP) is strictly for my fellow wonderers here. Others need not apply, or even read it. Just move along. We'll take it from here. 😊
* * *
Thanks to scientific instrumentation, we are aware of many conditions
outside our visual spectrum. Centuries
ago, before such instruments were developed, we humans believed that, visually,
what we saw is what there was; nothing else.
Seeing was believing, case closed.
Claiming otherwise would have been considered absurd (delusional,
witchcraft, looney-bin stuff).
At that time, we did not know that, for example, butterflies and other insects could see things we could not. We did not know that gamma rays and microwaves and other phenomena were all around us.
With the advent of future instrumentation, it turned out that our insistence of “what we see is what we get” was wrong; shockingly wrong. We found out that another “slice of reality” existed right there alongside ours, at the same time, in parallel time, though we did not have direct access to it without such instrumentation. Yes, it was "there, but not there," as it were.
Here’s another example of currently inaccessible phenomena. We know that, on the chalkboard, there has to
be more than the four dimensions (length, width, depth, and time) that we
experience directly. My understanding is that scientists in the know postulate that there are
some 10 or 11 other dimensions that we currently do not have any access to
whatsoever; and no instrumentation yet exists to give us such access. It’s all theoretical except for the perfect chalkboard
math. And who can deny math? When all is said and done, I'd say math is about the only perfect, solid, “can’t get around it” type phenomenon
there is left.
Where am I going with this?
Bottom line, even with today’s technological inventions and advancements,
I still have to wonder just how “lacking” our knowledge is of what’s going on around
us. We have already surprisingly and
unexpectedly found out so much, since those clueless days of ancient times.
Now, finally, for the questions:
1. Do you think that someday even more advanced technology will
be developed to detect other phenomena that is currently outside our so-called modern-day
instrumentation? Or do you believe that
we’ve gone as far as we can, instrumentation-wise?
2. Regardless of having the needed instrumentation, do you
believe there is something else (more) out there, other than what we currently know
about? If no, and if past centuries don't serve as prologue, what makes you so cocksure there’s nothing more?
3. If yes, there is something else (more), what could that
something possibly be? (e.g., gods, spirits, afterlife, soul separation from
the body, other parallel realities, multiple side-by-side versions of oneself, nonsensical
oxymorons such as those square circles, solid liquids, other.)
Let your mind wander as it wonders. Let’s brainstorm together.
(by PrimalSoup)
