Regarding Trump's speech last night and MSM complicity

Yesterday, I wrote to PBS and NPR asking them to not broadcast Trump's speech. That is because one could reasonably expect his speech to be mostly anti-democratic, authoritarian demagoguery heavily larded with lies, slanders, crackpot reasoning and deranged blither. Why bother broadcasting malicious evil? After all, PBS and NPR could easily just summarize the speech after it was over instead of giving Trump and his evil millions of dollars worth of free advertising.

When I checked this morning, both apparently broadcast it live. No surprise there. Willing or not, PBS and NPR are complicit in MAGA demagoguery, authoritarianism and corruption. Those two sources betrayed us and our democracy. Along with the rest of the MSM (mainstream media), they get a well-deserved grade of F-.

What was the speech?

One can ask, was the speech mostly authoritarian demagoguery, mostly democratic honest speech, or mostly something else? Was it larded with lies, slanders and crackpot reasoning as usual? The answers are no surprise. It was mostly authoritarian demagoguery and larded with lies, slanders and crackpot reasoning.

PolitiFact pointed out numerous lies and misleading assertions. Some of the lies, e.g., drug prices have dropped by 100% or more, are not just blatant lies, but insulting lies. Trump claimed
he worked to "slash prices on drugs and pharmaceuticals by as much as 400, 500, and even 600%". However, none of that sleaze fazes most Trump supporters. They rationalize Trump's lies into nothingburgers like this:

Trump repeated a series of debunked lies and introduced new whoppers. His lies included fibs about inflation, gas prices, job growth, investment totals and the trajectory of the cost of living. Independent data sharply contradicted some of his claims, such as an 18 trillion dollar investment and his assertion of broad “price drops”. He exaggerated reality by large margins.

Why did everyone broadcast it?

Given that everyone knew in advance that Trump would spew toxic lies, slanders and crackpottery, why broadcast it? Why did the MSM broadcast Trump's filth, insults and lies? Was it a mostly matter of complicity due to sympathetic corporate and investor ownership? Was it mostly due to incompetence and/or stupidity? Something else?

Available evidence leads to a reasonable belief that the MSM's decision to broadcast Trump's malicious speech reflects primarily corporate profit-seeking combined with intimidation. It was not primarily a matter of good-faith news judgment or shocking incompetence/stupidity. Everyone knew in advance exactly what Trump would deliver. He delivered as expected.

Networks deliberately broke precedent by airing this overtly partisan address. Now, contrast that with how the MSM treated Biden. In 2022, the major broadcast networks refused Biden primetime access for a democracy speech, dismissing it as too political. Instead they aired reruns of Law & Order and Young Sheldon. But those same networks preempted season finales of major shows, e.g., Survivor on CBS and The Floor on Fox, to carry Trump's transparently partisan attack speech that the White House itself billed as touting "historic accomplishments" rather than announcing policy or addressing any crisis.

Does anyone see any hypocrisy here?

What about PBS and NPR?: PBS and NPR probably broadcast the speech primarily out of fear of Trump's threats, not profit motive. They don't operate on an advertising-based profit model like commercial networks. PBS and NPR were still fighting lawsuits against Trump's defunding order as of yesterday. They very likely calculated that refusing to air a presidential address, despite it being pure propaganda, would​provide evidence supporting Trump's "biased media" claims in pending court cases. In turn, that would give him additional justification for further attacks and revocation of their broadcast licenses. In essence, Trump now has the power to coerce collaboration by institutions Trump is in the process of actively destroying.

We're screwed. So is our democracy, rule of law, civil liberties, and transparency and honesty in government. 

From the dark free speech files: The rising scourge of the vaccine denial religion

Hand-to-hand combat

with crackpots

For better or worse, inventing and spewing anti-vaccine lies and crackpottery is protected free speech. Actually, it is for the worse for public health, democracy, respect for experts and empirical facts. Arguably devastating. Yes, vaccine denial is inherently anti-democratic at least in terms of state of mind. When the denial mindset manifests in politics, it is in fact anti-democracy.

A NYT opinion (not paywalled) discusses the ongoing rise and toxic influence of vaccine denialism. Innocent people will be needlessly and avoidably killed. But, a pile of corpses doesn't faze vaccine crackpots and deniers. Vaccine denial is and probably always has been, more or less, a faith-based religion, not science. Anti-vaccine religion, like all or nearly all others, cannot be rationally engaged with.

What is troubling about this opinion by a non-expert is their observation that even trying to calmly and respectfully engage with vaccine deniers may be more damaging than beneficial. That is something I do not recall having heard before, but maybe my memory is faulty on this point.

The NYT opinionator, Jessica Grose, is not a vaccine expert. She is an opinion person. She describes a YouTube program where a vaccine science believer, Dr. Mikhail Varshavski, a New Jersey-based family medicine physician. He is also a medical social media influencer better known as Dr. Mike. On the show, he tussled with vaccine science deniers for a few hours and they bickered about how good or bad a job RFK Jr. is doing with public health and public health matters. 

Gorse believes that Kennedy’s supporters do not have a reasonable grasp of the science they argue. I agree with that. Despite truth in some of the facts they recite, the facts are usually grossly distorted, or cherry picked and taken out of context. Their arguments fail on fundamental principles of fact, reason, science and last but maybe equally important, the Principle of Charity. 

Gorse commented that she wrote a column suggesting that public debates like this one with Dr. Mike would be a useful way to rebuild Americans' trust in vaccines. She believed in the sunshine effect of publicly airing anti-vaccine arguments and debunking them with evidence and reason. Apparently, the Dr. Mike episode and other things changed her mind about that. She lost faith that debating staunch advocates of Kennedy's crackpot public health agenda can build public trust back. 

Her core conclusion is that in a format where someone with real scientific expertise is put on the same level as an passionate layperson, is not going to work as long as Kennedy is in office. She wrote:

As of Dec. 12, there were 126 confirmed cases of measles in an ongoing outbreak in South Carolina, and 119 of those cases were among unvaccinated people. Almost all of the people affected were under 18. The United States is on track to lose its measles elimination status. While a vast majority of parents are still giving their children basic childhood inoculations, anti-vaccine influencers continue to chip away at the public’s trust.

I could probably be construed as a public health influencer, and I will continue to write about these issues, even though I worry that it is increasingly futile. I just think they are wasting their time debating MAHA types on social media or podcasts.

I agree in part with her analysis and conclusion. But the problem is broader, deeper and more threatening than just Kennedy's seriously threatening public health crackpottery. The big problem is decades of bigoted, corrupt, authoritarian demagoguery by MAGA propagandists and their recent predecessors like Rush Limbaugh and Fox News. This is not a problem confined to public health disasters like Trump putting the crackpot Kennedy in power. This same problem now pervades and poisons most or all of government and most or all pro-democracy, pro-public interest government functions. The American public has been taught and learned to (i) trust demagoguery, crackpots and intolerant authoritarianism, and (ii) distrust actual experts and tolerant democracy.

Our situation cannot be undone just by making Kennedy go away. It very likely cannot be undone even by making Trump go away. MAGA has sunk deep roots into (1) the minds of tens of millions of Americans, and (2) pro-democracy and pro-public interest federal functions. That did not happen overnight or in a year. It took decades and tens of billions of dollars to poison, persuade and trap those minds. It was a massive, prolonged war for minds. MAGA authoritarianism won. That war and trapped enough minds so that MAGA authoritarianism is in power.

The thing is though, Gorse and others have not figured out an effective way to combat pro-authoritarian MAGA demagoguery. Unfortunately, there probably is no effective way to do that. That belief is based on the usual culprits, human cognitive biology and social behavior. The ineffective sunshine method to kill nonsense that Gorse still engages with despite her lost faith, is probably the best non-violent weapon that pro-democracy, pro-truth people have to fight with. 

Although fighting dark free speech and demagoguery with honest speech isn't fully effective, maybe it will be just barely effective enough to save our democracy and rule of law. However, if anyone has a better weapon or tactic to suggest, it would be great to hear about it.

MAGA continues to cynically dismantle public interest protections

 In Project 2025, one of the high priority targets to destroy was the CFPB (Consumer Finance Protection Bureau). That federal agency protected consumer finance activity, including protections against discrimination in lending to women and minorities. Soon after being sworn in, Trump halted most CFPB consumer protection activities related to fair lending enforcement based on disparate impact and systemic discrimination. It now focuses on small matters. 

To make matters worse for the public interest, the MAGA CFPB is proposing new rules that will essentially eliminate key protections for woman and minorities. Trump's April 2025 Executive Order on Restoring Equality of Opportunity inspired the proposed new rules. The anti-consumer sleight of hand here is by now a standard MAGA tactic to drain power from citizen protections and shift it to special interests, financial institutions in this case. The old CFPB has rules against discriminating against women and minorities. The new proposed rules calls those old ones discriminatory. The new proposal will eliminate those protections almost completely, if not completely. As usual, MAGA elites leave a fig leaf in place to hide the gaping wound the new rules will inflict. 

MAGA cynically frames its proposal as restoring "meritocracy" and "colorblindness". But its practical effect is to remove the main legal tools the CFPB had to challenge systemic discrimination and to prohibit programs designed to specifically help underserved groups. Under the new rules, a borrower can no longer challenge lender policies that are neutral on paper but discriminatory in practice. Thanks to MAGA, redlining with its segregated neighborhoods is making a comeback!

The new rules also requiring proof of explicit intentional discrimination, "disparate treatment". That effectively legalizes institutional practices that discriminate against women and minorities, as long as a lender does not explicitly say they have a discriminatory motive or reason for denying loans to target groups. 

What are the primary motives here? Probably greed first followed by inherent MAGA bigotry-racism-misogyny. In a December 14, 2025 letter, the American Banking Association explicitly endorsed removing protections for minorities and women. The banks complained about "regulatory ambiguity" and "arbitrary government enforcement" to cover profit motive lust. While big banks previously claimed to support DEI, they now actively support removing the rules that enforce it. MAGA's demagogic "woke" panic and a crackpot "debanking" narrative provide perfect cover. Banks now claim (1) they are being forced to stop the illusory "discriminating against conservatives" (debanking) narrative, and (2) removing disparate impact is just "restoring meritocracy". Meanwhile, the financial institutions will quietly pocket profits from deregulation.

MAGA's and the banks' mendacity and cynicism in this are jaw-dropping to say the least.

Scientific measurement of routine 

MAGA demagoguery

MAGA's authoritarian surveillance state

The bad news continues to flow as our democracy, rule of law and civil liberties continue to fade.

MAGA's authoritarian surveillance state gains reach and power 

The HDS (Department of Homeland Security) is proposing a vast expansion in government surveillance reach and power. This is aggressive and intrusive based on no evidence and crackpot reasoning. What DHS proposes is a drastic, unconstitutional expansion of the MAGA's surveillance state capabilities. The fig leaf to hide the illegality and authoritarianism is alleged border security needs. In recent years, the CBP (Customs and Border Control) increased biometric data collection, but this specific vast expansion crosses red lines regarding privacy, genetic sovereignty, and guilt-by-association.

The most radical shift is the expansion of "biometrics" to explicitly include DNA and iris scans for nearly all Form I-94 applicants (all tourists, business travelers, students and foreign workers). Before this, biometrics were limited to fingerprints and face photos. 

Requiring DNA submission for routine tourist or business travel treats every entrant as a criminal suspect. DNA collection is usually reserved for arrestees, not tourists or business travelers. There is no immediate security utility for DNA in a typical border crossing scenario that fingerprints or face photos do not already provide.

But wait!! There's much more: Worse than all of that, the proposed changes mandate collecting intrusive data about a traveler's family. That includes (1) family member telephone numbers used in the last five years, and (2)​ family member dates of birth, places of birth, and residencies. By demanding 5 years of phone history for family members, the government is effectively building a surveillance database of people who are not crossing the border. That includes millions of US citizens who are related to foreign visitors. This requirement means that a traveler's eligibility can depend on the conduct or identity of their remote relatives. It is a classic tool of authoritarian regimes to leverage family data to pressure or monitor individuals.

The perjury trap: The 5-year data requirement requirement is administratively absurd. Most people cannot accurately recall every family member phone number over a five-year period. This intentionally creates a perjury trap. Inevitable minor errors can be used to deny entry or revoke visas later. 

Unneeded and unjustifiable: Although the stated goal is identity verification, current e-Passports (with chips), facial recognition, and 10-print fingerprinting is already statistically almost perfect for proving identity. Adding iris and DNA would yield diminishing very little added security while exponentially increasing privacy risk.

The DHS notice cites an "unanticipated event" to justify an emergency clearance, but it fails to explain why historic family phone numbers are suddenly critical for national security. Common sense says it will rarely be useful. However, this vague justification is evidence the MAGA government is fabricating a crisis to permanently expand its authoritarian powers. These changes transform the I-94 from a travel document into a comprehensive intelligence dossier. It demands that visitors surrender not just their own privacy (genetic data), but the privacy of their entire family tree (contact history).