Pragmatic politics focused on the public interest for those uncomfortable with America's two-party system and its way of doing politics. Considering the interface of politics with psychology, cognitive biology, social behavior, morality and history.
Etiquette
Monday, February 17, 2025
Canards and Tropes
Sunday, February 16, 2025
Simple question ........................ YET not so simple.
The quote, “He who saves his country does not violate any law,” which Bonaparte used during his reign as emperor, was shared by Trump on his Truth Social platform.
So............................
Is it time for the Left, the Democrats, even normally civil-minded people, to start breaking the law in order to "save" the country from Trump?
Amid Democrats’ shock and bickering over how much to respond to President Donald Trump is a deeper question rippling through leaders across the Capitol and across the country: How much should they rely on the same institutional and procedural maneuvers they used during the first Trump term, and how much are they willing to wield their own wrecking balls?
https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/16/politics/democrats-strategy-powerless-trump/index.html
And what would breaking the law to save the country from Trump look like?
Saturday, February 15, 2025
Dictatorship bits: Vicious retribution; DoJ's subversion; Crapifying jobs; MAGA gits ’er done
The White House barred a credentialed Associated Press reporter and photographer from boarding the presidential airplane Friday for a weekend trip with Donald Trump, saying the news agency’s stance on how to refer to the Gulf of Mexico was to blame for the exclusion. It represented a significant escalation by the White House in a four-day dispute with the AP over access to the presidency.
AP reporters and photographers travel with the president virtually everywhere as part of a press “pool” and have for decades. AP journalism serves millions of readers and thousands of news outlets around the world.
The Adams case is removed from the U.S. attorney's office of the Southern District of New York and transferred to Washington, where it will be dismissed. On the day Bove sent his poison letter, five prosecutors in the Public Integrity unit there also resigned rather than drop the case.
Rep. Luna appears to suggest that she intends to bring in members of the Warren Commission as part of her JFK investigation pic.twitter.com/9oLjt9rqlJ
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 11, 2025
Friday, February 14, 2025
The State of Our Union...
I’m gonna pull a Germaine on everyone and give you a monster post. Hey, turnabout’s fair play, my friend! 😜
A week or so back, one of our (ir)regulars here, Adam G. Yoksas, made an excellent point about the status quo of America. It has to do with how the U.S. Society has become culturally and patriotically “fractured.” Here’s an excerpt from one of Adam’s post:
Despite over two hundred years of effort, any attempt to give the Americans a common culture has failed. In fact, the longer that time goes on, the less Americans think of themselves as a people, but as peoples. What unites us is law, not culture. That Constitution is really the only thing that makes us a single people.
Without it, we become--at best--Italy during the Renaissance, a collection of small principalities, confederations, and oligarchies all vying for advantage, with mercenary inclinations. At worst, we become post-Yugoslavia, a chaotic mess of ethnic, religious, and cultural tribes that view one another with suspicion and even open hostility.
The only language that cuts across the cultures in America is the language of the Constitution, the debates over rights, limits, expressed and implied powers, ambition cheching ambition, freedoms and equalities. That these things exist "under the law" is assumed, given that there's no source available to grant us these things outside of the law of that Constitution. No king is going to guarantee them. No church is going to make a case for them. No deep cultural myths are there so that notions of justice can take root.
Only the Constitution keeps us together. It is far more essential to us than any other civilization before or since.
Now, for my thoughts.
As our U.S. melting pot grows more diverse with each passing decade, I suppose a “cultural and patriotic separation” was destined to happen. As a result, there become fewer and fewer “focal points” for the greater society to hang on to, other than our Constitutional system of laws. I agree with Adam, we still do have those in common… at least for the moment.
I think it’s true, one’s heritage plays a big part in how we see each other. For example, in Spain, indigenous people all consider themselves to be Spaniards. Or, in Greece, all indigenous people consider themselves to be Greeks. But here in America, we don’t have that common ancestral heritage to cling to. (Btw, the Native American Indian would have something to say about that!!) So while we may each, individually, revere our familial ancestry, as a group, there is no common “heritage bond” to hold us together, like in other countries.
Still, I love our country’s diversity. I think it can (and in theory should) make us stronger, in a lot of ways. I think it could (and should) be that “shining city on the hill” model to help show the rest of the world “how it’s done,” or can be done. But that’s not what’s happening; indeed, the opposite.
Seems our familiarity and freedoms have instead bred contempt among our people. Like with our personal families, we can and have gotten “too comfortable” like that. But unlike with our families, where “kinship forgiveness” seems to have a way to survive the family discord, cultural differences tend to breed a kind of paranoia and take on the form of “otherness.”
Because we are all so different, with different values and from different ethnic backgrounds, it seems too many groups want to vie for some kind of dominance in the U.S. (or feel they must defend their perceived dominance (e.g., see Whites supremacy groups). Every group seems to aspire to get to the top of the “alpha dog” totem pole; some groups more than others. Some just want to live in peace and rather not get involved; at least for the moment, until they one day may have the numbers to back themselves. In the meantime, they are just happy/grateful to be here to enjoy our cornucopia.
Personally, I think that alpha dog dominance is a lot of what the MAGA movement is about. They call it Make America Great Again, but what they really mean is, Make American WASP-y Again… because they feel they are “losing dominance control.” That’s what all the hullabaloo is about with illegal immigration. And, don’t get me wrong. I agree there has to be some kind of immigration controls. I understand that too.
Okay, now for the questions:
Do you agree that America has become a fractured society in the ways I’ve mentioned? If you disagree, give your reasoning.
As Adam Yoksas surmised, is the Constitution now the only “glue” that holds us together?
What can make the U.S. an e pluribus unum (“out of many, one”) country again? What is it going to take?
I had suggested mandatory paid community service of some kind, say two years right out of high school, and not many here agreed with that. They didn’t like the idea of the government controlling people in that way (even though I think it would be for our own long-term good).
Is some sort of innate “human decency” a contender for bringing the US together? Or is that kind of caring/compassion a thing of the past? Or has paranoia and suspicion taken over a majority of us and we can’t trust anyone anymore. Has human decency reached a low point of no return, thanks to distrust and paranoia?
[Your e pluribus unum suggestion(s) here]
Is the true (root) problem here that “division is just the nature of diversity?” In other words, a built-in problem/condition that’s never going away?
Take your time and think about it, even into the weekend. 😉😁
(by PrimalSoup)
MAGA's authoritarian subversion of the rule of law: It cannot get much clearer than this
“In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true. ... Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.” -- Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
“The constant lying is not aimed at making the people believe a lie, but at ensuring that no one believes anything anymore. A people that can no longer distinguish between truth and lies cannot distinguish between right and wrong. And such a people, deprived of the power to think and judge, is, without knowing and willing it, completely subjected to the rule of lies. With such a people, you can do whatever you want.” -- Author unknown, A plausible restatement of Hannah Arendt’s views of the power and social effects of authoritarian demagoguery, lies and slanders
“To the extent that knowledge gives power, to that extent do lies affect the distribution of power; they add to that of the liar, and diminish that of the deceived, altering his choices at different levels. .... Lies foster the belief that there are more alternatives than is really the case; at other times, a lie may lead to the unnecessary loss of confidence in the best alternative. .... When we undertake to deceive others intentionally, we communicate messages meant to mislead them, meant to make them believe what we ourselves do not believe. We can do so through gesture, through disguise, by means of action or inaction, even through silence.” ― Sissela Bok, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life
MAGA updates: Musk's faux website; Regarding DJT's immunity; To the victor go the spoils
“President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office. ... He didn’t get away with anything, yet. We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation. And former presidents are not immune from being [held] accountable by either one.”