The NYT reports (not paywalled) that federal funding cuts are on the verge of putting a top environmental science journal out of business: “Environmental Health Perspectives, widely considered the premier environmental health journal, has announced that it would pause acceptance of new studies for publication, as federal cuts have left its future uncertain. For more than 50 years, the journal has received funding from the National Institutes of Health to review studies on the health effects of environmental toxins — from “forever chemicals” to air pollution — and publish the research free of charge. Scientific journals have long been a target of top health officials in the Trump administration. In a book published last year, Dr. Martin A. Makary, the new commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, accused journal editorial boards of “gate-keeping” and publishing only information that supports a ‘groupthink narrative.’”
The NYT quoted Dr. Brainworm (RFK Jr), secretary of health and human services, as directly threatening medical journals with federal prosecution: “I’m going to find a way to sue you unless you come up with a plan right now to show how you’re going to start publishing real science.” By ‘real science’ Brainworm means pseudoscience, crackpottery, lies, etc.
The only thinking that MAGA elites are capable of is MAGA's kleptocratic, authoritarian, propaganda, demagoguery, lies, crackpottery, etc. MAGA elites are definitely going to get lots of innocent people killed and species disappeared. But no worries about corpses for MAGA elites, they can and will blame Biden, Obama, Hillary, Benghazi, Hunter’s laptop, DEI, etc., etc.
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
The Electronic Frontier Foundation reports about an authoritarian law that passed congress. The law is sold to the public as cracking down on NCII (non-consensual intimate imagery) such as revenge porn and sex photos that people did not want posted online. All of that is just fine.
But the problem, as is usually the case, the law is intentionally sloppy. It hands djt a weapon to control, or try to control, a broad swath of content on the internet he dislikes. For example, satirical memes mocking Trump will probably be flagged as “intimate imagery” under the Act’s sloppy definitions. Even if that is blatantly false, it would cost a small fortune to prove that in court. Almost all House and Senate Democrats voted to support this monstrosity of slop. The EFF writes:
The House of Representatives passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act, giving the powerful a dangerous new route to manipulate platforms into removing lawful speech that they simply don't like. President Trump himself has said that he would use the law to censor his critics. The bill passed the Senate in February, and it now heads to the president's desk.
The takedown provision in TAKE IT DOWN applies to a much broader category of content—potentially any images involving intimate or sexual content—than the narrower NCII (non-consensual intimate imagery) definitions found elsewhere in the bill. The takedown provision also lacks critical safeguards against frivolous or bad-faith takedown requests. Services will rely on automated filters, which are infamously blunt tools. They frequently flag legal content, from fair-use commentary to news reporting. The law’s tight time frame requires that apps and websites remove speech within 48 hours, rarely enough time to verify whether the speech is actually illegal. As a result, online service providers, particularly smaller ones, will likely choose to avoid the onerous legal risk by simply depublishing the speech rather than even attempting to verify it.
The safeguard for criticism of djt, MAGA elites and MAGA authoritarianism is to not post any derogatory images of anything, especially djt or MAGA elites. If there is no image, the law does not reach it. In theory.
That theoretical constraint does not prevent people from making false, bad-faith claims. Claims under this law forces the platform owner of the accused content to take it down or go to court and spend thousands of dollars defending legal content that could be taken down for nothing. There are no penalties for people making false or frivolous claims under this law. There is no explicit language in the law that excludes text-only content from being flagged as illegal.
In the case of this blog, Google would have to take down content someone flags under the take-down law or decide the flag was wrong. Google, sure as death and taxes, is not going to spend one penny checking to see if one of my blog posts is legal or not. Google will go to court to defend any of my blog posts.
Worse yet, maybe our MAGA Republican USSC will say congress did intend to include text-only “intimate criticisms”, whatever that concept might mean. Regardless, this law looks like another weapon in MAGA’s campaign to equate legitimate dissent with illegality. Time will tell how this plays out. With some luck, maybe MAGA won’t abuse this too much. It will be very tempting for trolls.
Q: If any of my content gets flagged and Google takes it down, should people start flagging content on MAGA propaganda sites like Faux News, Breitbart, The Federalist, The Heritage Foundation, etc.?