The Overview Effect (OE) as an experience in which, for some people (not all), viewing Earth from space produces overwhelming emotion and identification with humanity and the planet as a whole. Its central features include awe, connectedness, and self-transcendence. People’s ordinary concerns seem to become smaller within a newly felt experience of a greater whole or reality. In space, people are at a distance and they’re seeing the Earth in the context of the universe. That is not the same context as what they can see while on Earth.
Is there an Overview Effect analogy with the 2026 election outcome?
Can one make an analogy between the OE and the election by comparing that to political perception? Maybe. A person’s frame might change from “Is my side winning? Are our enemies being defeated?”, to “What happened to the society we all have to inhabit? What are we doing to other people, to our institutions, and to our capacity to live together?”
Arguably the analogy is a meaningful because it describes a change in the unit of concern from the political faction to the shared world. That doesn’t require equating political disillusionment with astronauts’ experiences, or claiming that research has established such an effect among former MAGA supporters.
The emotional center of the analogy is grief, not just “I was wrong”, but “Something valuable has been damaged or lost, and I can no longer avoid seeing it.”
That is somewhat different from the central emphasis of the OE phenomenon, which concerns awe and expanded identification rather than primarily feelings of loss. For the painful part of the analogy, research on “shattered assumptions” offers a closer conceptual connection. Disturbing experiences can challenge foundational beliefs about the world’s benevolence, meaningfulness, or reliability. A three-year study of 2,138 US adults found that worldview changes were generally modest. Profound transformation probably isn’t the usual response to adversity, e.g., the damage and loss that MAGA has caused.
If that is applied cautiously to the 2026 election outcome, several different losses could plausibly be involved: (1) Loss of faith in leaders or a movement someone trusted. (2) Loss of confidence in institutions they believed would prevent serious abuses. (3) Loss of an innocent national self-image. (4) Regret about bad MAGA conduct that many MAGA supporters supported, excused, or failed to oppose.
Those are possible interpretations of the experience of feelings about the 2026 election outcome. They are not findings about the 2026 electorate. And they need not all involve something that genuinely existed and is now gone. Sometimes the perception of loss is of an illusion. For example, the belief that institutions were automatically secure, that cruelty was incidental rather than intentional, or that one’s own political community could reliably distinguish loyalty from wrongdoing.
Meta-politics — beyond partisanship?
Could some voters are experiencing a political analog of the OE, not the wonder of seeing Earth from space, but the shock of seeing their country beyond the frame of partisan loyalty? What once appeared to be a struggle for their side to win may begin to look like the basis for serious damage and loss to society and what was good in it. Institutions that protect rights and deliver essential services have been weakened or dismantled, commitments to due process and humane treatment have been violated, and people who depend on those protections and services have suffered documented harm. Recognition of that could bring grief, shame, and a renewed sense of responsibility to at least some newly awakened people.
The election outcome arguably is be consistent with such an awakening. Of course, that alone cannot tell us how many people, if any, have felt the loss or undergone any awakening at all. As far as I know, there is no research on this point, so the sense-of-loss hypothesis here is speculation.
Q: Can partisans on both sides of the MAGA divide experience feelings of grief or regret over what we have lost regardless of how the election turned out because humans are human, regardless of their politics, or is there no plausible analogy between the OE and what some people might feel after the 2026 elections?
Some info sources:
The overview effect: Awe and self-transcendent experience in space flight
William Shatner experienced profound grief in space. It was the ‘overview effect’ — “I was crying. I didn’t know what I was crying about. I had to go off some place and sit down and think, what’s the matter with me? And I realized I was in grief. I wept for the Earth because I realized it’s dying. I saw more clearly than I have, with all the studying and reading I’ve done, the writhing, slow death of Earth and we on it. It’s a little tiny rock with an onion skin air around it. That’s how fragile it all is. It’s so fragile. We hang by a thread … we’re just dangling.”
When are assumptions shaken? A prospective, longitudinal investigation of negative life events and worldviews in a national sample — Older age buffered the association between negative events and worldview change. Individuals who experienced more negative events had less stable worldviews over time. In general, worldview change was small, highlighting the apparent stability of these beliefs.
Trump Administration’s Pervasive Attacks on Rights — Democratic Norms and Anti-Discrimination Remedies Rejected; Rights Undermined Globally (pro-democracy norms are gone and probably not coming back — maybe they should not come back, but replaced by laws imposing mandatory jail time)
Trump’s aid freeze sparks mayhem around the world (decades of steady, American compassion and humanitarian presence is lost, maybe forever because we’re in horrific debt — as long as MAGA is in power the US will remain a far more callous humanitarian presence)
No comments:
Post a Comment