Getting it done, the Trump edition

 Feast your eyes:

Colombia caves on deportations after Trump's threats

Colombia's leftist president, Gustavo Petro, had earlier said he would only take back citizens "with dignity," such as on civilian planes, and had turned back two US military aircraft with repatriated Colombians.

Trump, less than a week back in office, responded furiously and threatened sanctions of 25 percent that would quickly scale up to 50 percent against Latin America's fourth-largest economy.

Petro initially sought to hit back and impose his own tariffs on US products, but by the end of the volatile Sunday, he had backed down.

https://www.trtworld.com/latin-america/colombia-caves-on-deportations-after-trumps-threats-18258273

Trump and Trudeau make a deal: Canada-U.S. trade war delayed by ‘at least 30 days’

According to the prime minister, in addition to implementing the $1.3 billion border plan – which includes deploying additional personnel, drones, surveillance equipment and helicopters – Canada is making new commitments.

Trudeau said 10,000 frontline personnel “are and will be working on protecting the border,” Canada will be listing cartels as terrorists, and the federal government will appoint a “fentanyl czar.”

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/all-hands-on-deck-trudeau-talks-to-trump-as-canadian-politicos-make-final-us-push-ahead-of-tuesday-tariffs/

Trump agrees to pause tariffs on Canada and Mexico after they pledge to boost border enforcement.

Mexico bows to Trump, scrambles to meet his demands

“Mexico will immediately reinforce the northern border with 10,000 members of the National Guard to prevent drug trafficking from Mexico to the United States, particularly fentanyl,” Sheinbaum said in a translated statement on X, formerly Twitter.

“The United States is committed to working to prevent the trafficking of high-powered weapons to Mexico,” Sheinbaum added. “Our teams will begin working today on two fronts: security and trade. They are pausing tariffs for one month from now.”

https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/02/mexico-bows-to-trump-scrambles-to-meet-his-demands/

Rubio demands Panama 'reduce China influence' over canal

While not addressing the ultimatum over the canal, Mr Mulino said in a news conference on Sunday that his government would not renew an agreement with China on its "Belt and Road" investment initiative signed by a former president in 2017.

Mr Rubio called the development "a great step forward" in a post on X on Monday morning as he was preparing to leave Panama.

"[A]nother example of [President Trump's] leadership to protect our national security and deliver prosperity for the American people," said Mr Rubio.

Mulino also told reporters he did not see a serious threat of US military force to seize the canal, saying he had proposed technical-level talks with the US to address Mr Trump's concerns about Chinese influence.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c39149p920no

Six Americans freed in Venezuela after Trump envoy meets with Maduro

Six Americans who had been detained in Venezuela are heading home to the US, President Donald Trump announced Friday, after his envoy met with the country’s President Nicolás Maduro.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/01/americas/americans-freed-in-venezuela-intl-hnk/index.html

Trump tells Putin to end 'ridiculous war' in Ukraine or face new sanctions

Donald Trump has warned he will impose high tariffs and further sanctions on Russia if Vladimir Putin fails to end the war in Ukraine.

Writing on his social media platform Truth Social, he said that by pushing to settle the war he was doing Russia and its president a "very big favour".

Trump had previously said he would negotiate a settlement to Russia's full-scale invasion launched in February 2022, in a single day.

Responding to the threat of harsher sanctions, the Kremlin said it remains "ready for an equal dialogue, a mutually respectful dialogue".

"Settle now, and STOP this ridiculous War! IT'S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE. If we don't make a 'deal', and soon, I have no other choice but to put high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States, and various other participating countries."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjw4q7v7ez1o

Trump to speak with China's Xi after hiking tariffs, White House says

China, which has long called tariffs counterproductive, offered relatively muted criticism of the tariffs and signaled an openness to talks.

The country's government appeared poised to seek a deal with Trump that could delay or stop tariffs, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The U.S. dollar hit a record high against the Chinese yuan traded offshore and was hovering near those levels on Monday.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/trump-warns-tariffs-china-may-increase-2025-02-03/

With Trump getting it done and kicking butt, is it any wonder..............

Trump favorable / unfavorable ratings

Trump has a 50.4% favorability rating based on 629 polls.

Feb 3, 2025    Favorable    50.4%

                        Unfavorable     47.3%

https://elections2024.thehill.com/national/trump-favorability-rating/

MAGA!

Update: The authoritarian attack on fact checking

A WaPo opinion discusses the gutting of fact checking on social media (not paywalled). A few points are worth being aware of: 

Last month, the tech company Meta announced its decision to end the third-party fact-checking system it used on Facebook and Instagram. Instead, Meta will adopt a community notes model that invites users to challenge misinformation through the app. For a community note to appear, it must be agreed upon by other contributors from a “range of perspectives.”

Interviewer: How well do you think X’s community notes have worked at challenging false or misleading information?

Disinformation expert: Not well. Community notes basically give up on the idea of fact-checking. Truth is not a matter of consensus, and it’s not just a matter of people being mistaken. We talk about the “wisdom of crowds.” Sometimes crowds can be ignorant — but that’s not the real danger. The real danger with community notes is that there are bad actors out there; there are people who will use it as a playground to spread disinformation.

Interviewer: Even before Meta decided to cut its fact-checkers, was fighting disinformation on social media actually working?

Expert: No, they weren’t doing nearly enough. Here’s the shame with Facebook: It does an excellent job of vetting the things it truly cares about. Most people have never seen pornography or beheadings or terrorism on Facebook. And that’s because there is a human team that is dedicated to scrubbing the site of those things, because the executives understand that it would hurt their bottom line. They could do the same thing for false claims, but they choose not to.

The expert claims the best way for the MSM to regain public trust, now at an all-time low of 31%, is to talk to the public in person, face-to-face. His reasoning is that once the public meets MSM operatives who put truth above all else, the public will come to see that they are good people. he says that public trust is built through face-to-face conversation. He also says not to lie, because once a reporter lies, trust is lost and almost never comes back. 

REALITY CHECK

The expert's assertion that community notes gives up on the idea of fact-checking is correct. There will not be agreement among other contributors from a “range of perspectives”, and we all know it. Social media's concept of “community notes” is pure propaganda to deflect from the fact that fact checking by social media is dead and gone.

Context -- definitions: A fact is an objective, verifiable piece of information that remains constant regardless of belief or perspective. It is something that can be proven through evidence, observation, or empirical data. For example, “fire is hot” is a fact. By contrast, truth is more subjective and can vary based on individual beliefs, experiences, and interpretations. Truths are often constructed by people to describe how they perceive reality. They can be influenced by faith, commitment, or shared experiences among groups. For instance, the statement “God exists” can be a truth for someone who believes in a deity, but it isn’t a fact.

The expert is also absolutely right to assert that truth, assuming he means fact, is not a matter of consensus. Facts are facts, which are objective. A truth can be a matter of consensus. Here he was sloppy and should have referred to fact, not truth. 

I find the expert’s advice on how the MSM can regain public trust to be shockingly silly and naive. First, his advice is not even remotely practical. It is impossible for journalists to meet in person with over 200 million people, even if they are in semi-intimate gatherings of 50 people or less. 

Probably most people who believe the MSM intentionally lies at least a lot have been deceived by dark free speech, including political demagoguery. They hold a false belief. Even when the MSM asserts a fact that is false, and the MSM source retracts it, most of those people won’t accept the sincerity of the retraction. They will rationalize it away. Like the expert says, once a person believes they have been lied to, trust is usually gone and usually not coming back. A retraction of a mistake ain’t gonna cut it. On this point, the expert is irrational.

In my opinion, it is very discouraging that even now with the rise of demagoguery-powered authoritarianism in American politics and society, experts do not understand critical, fundamental matters in politics like cognitive biology, rhetoric and dark free speech. They are inexcusably sloppy about the distinction between truth and facts. That low level of performance does not bode well for democracy or the human condition.

Global warming updates

A NYT opinion:

That Giant Sucking Sound? It’s Climate Change Devouring Your Home’s Value.

As the compounding impacts of climate-driven disasters take effect, we are seeing home insurance prices spike around the country, pushing up the costs of owning a home. In some cases, insurance companies are pulling out of towns altogether. And in others, people are beginning to move away.

One little-discussed result is that soaring home prices in the United States may have peaked in the places most at risk, leaving the nation on the precipice of a generational decline. That’s the finding of a new analysis by the First Street Foundation, a research firm that studies climate threats to housing and provides some of the best climate adaptation data available, both freely and commercially. The analysis predicts an extraordinary reversal in housing fortunes for Americans — nearly $1.5 trillion in asset losses over the next 30 years.

Insurance rates are where the systemic economic risk comes in. Not long ago, insurance premiums were a modest cost of owning a home, amounting to about 8 percent of an average mortgage payment. But insurance costs today are about one-fifth the size of a typical payment, outpacing inflation and even the rate of appreciation on the homes themselves. That makes owning property, on paper anyway, a bad investment.

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

The NYT reports:

E.P.A. Tells More Than 1,000 They Could Be Fired ‘Immediately’

A spokeswoman for Lee Zeldin, the new head of the agency, said the goal was to create an “effective and efficient” federal work force

The Trump administration has warned more than 1,100 Environmental Protection Agency employees who work on climate change, reducing air pollution, enforcing environmental laws and other programs that they could be fired at any time.

An email, reviewed by The New York Times, was sent to staff members who were hired within the past year and have probationary status. Many of those employees were encouraged to join the E.P.A. under the Biden administration to rebuild the agency, which had been depleted during President Trump’s first term. Others are experienced federal workers who had taken new assignments within the agency.

Many had been hired to work on programs that Congress created through two recent laws, doing things like helping communities replace lead pipes, mediating toxic sites and funding clean energy projects aimed at reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that are heating the planet.

“As a probationary/trial period employee, the agency has the right to immediately terminate you,” the email states.  

Molly Vaseliou, an E.P.A. spokeswoman, said in a statement that “our goal is to be transparent.” She declined to answer questions about the email [the opposite of transparency = opacity], though, including whether Lee Zeldin, the agency’s new administrator, intended to terminate employees and, if so, for what reason [probably no reason will be given = opacity].

What DJT means by an “effective and efficient” federal work force is one that is ineffective and hostile to the concepts of global warming and environmental protections and regulations. This comes as no surprise. 

Project 2025 contains explicit proposals that are fundamentally hostile to the EPA and the broader concepts of addressing global warming and enforcing environmental regulations. For example, Project 2025 proposes eliminating key environmental protections, starting with dismantling the Clean Air Act. That severely weakens the EPA's authority to set health-based air quality standards, thereby undermining regulations meant to reduce pollution and protect public health.

Conclusion: DJT and MAGA will serve special interests at the expense of the public interest, including the environment.

Analysis: The new balance of power in American consumer and political markets

With DJT, the GOP and MAGA in power again, it is time to consider power. It flows from multiple sources, including politics, commerce and formal religion, especially Christianity. Not much power seems to arise from other sources like academics, liberal arts, philosophy, formal logic or science, unless they attach to politics, commerce or religion. That's especially true for science, especially if it is inconvenient to major power centers in politics, commerce or formal religion.

After DJT's election, one can assert there is a major war between between DJT's and MAGA's power and the commercial consumer market. For example, most consumers want to do something about global warming. DJT, MAGA and the carbon energy sector want to deny, distort or downplay the issue. So far, DJT, MAGA and the carbon energy sector simply ignore consumer sentiment and demand. Business as usual. That has been the case since the 1970s when most of the public became aware of environmental problems. 

It's always important to specify what the "market" means or is. The market in the time of DJT in his 2nd term means first and foremost far more kleptocratic, authoritarian political power demand or pressure at the expense of consumer power. Consumers are mostly a diffuse, non-political commercial market power source. That is the reality. 

A new reality is that DJT and MAGA now have far more power over Bezos, Zuckerberg and other billionaires and multi-millionaires than consumer's collective but diffuse power. That's why elites of commerce now owe and pay fealty to highly concentrated DJT and MAGA power. They have bended their knee and turned against democracy. In my opinion, that is inherent in unrestrained capitalism and capitalism under threat by sufficiently powerful authoritarianism. 

Nowadays, resistance to DJT and MAGA imposes risks on highly wealthy people and huge corporations. The risks also extend to many non-elites who are exposed to serious damage from kleptocratic authoritarian threats, e.g., federal employees. For the elites, the risks are loss of most or all of their wealth and power from a corrupt authoritarian American regime and government. To protect their wealth and power, capitalist elites and big businesses have no choice but to betray consumers and democracy. These are the new realities of the American capitalism game. Maybe it has been significantly that way for years. But is is definitely overwhelmingly that way now. 

Opinions about this will obviously vary widely. These are my mine.