Etiquette



DP Etiquette

First rule: Don't be a jackass. Most people are good.

Other rules: Do not attack or insult people you disagree with. Engage with facts, logic and beliefs. Out of respect for others, please provide some sources for the facts and truths you rely on if you are asked for that. If emotion is getting out of hand, get it back in hand. To limit dehumanizing people, don't call people or whole groups of people disrespectful names, e.g., stupid, dumb or liar. Insulting people is counterproductive to rational discussion. Insult makes people angry and defensive. All points of view are welcome, right, center, left and elsewhere. Just disagree, but don't be belligerent or reject inconvenient facts, truths or defensible reasoning.

Friday, February 14, 2025

The State of Our Union...

 

I’m gonna pull a Germaine on everyone and give you a monster post.  Hey, turnabout’s fair play, my friend! 😜

A week or so back, one of our (ir)regulars here, Adam G. Yoksas, made an excellent point about the status quo of America.  It has to do with how the U.S. Society has become culturally and patriotically “fractured.”  Here’s an excerpt from one of Adam’s post:

Despite over two hundred years of effort, any attempt to give the Americans a common culture has failed. In fact, the longer that time goes on, the less Americans think of themselves as a people, but as peoples. What unites us is law, not culture. That Constitution is really the only thing that makes us a single people.

Without it, we become--at best--Italy during the Renaissance, a collection of small principalities, confederations, and oligarchies all vying for advantage, with mercenary inclinations. At worst, we become post-Yugoslavia, a chaotic mess of ethnic, religious, and cultural tribes that view one another with suspicion and even open hostility.

The only language that cuts across the cultures in America is the language of the Constitution, the debates over rights, limits, expressed and implied powers, ambition cheching ambition, freedoms and equalities. That these things exist "under the law" is assumed, given that there's no source available to grant us these things outside of the law of that Constitution. No king is going to guarantee them. No church is going to make a case for them. No deep cultural myths are there so that notions of justice can take root.

Only the Constitution keeps us together. It is far more essential to us than any other civilization before or since.

Now, for my thoughts.

As our U.S. melting pot grows more diverse with each passing decade, I suppose a “cultural and patriotic separation” was destined to happen. As a result, there become fewer and fewer “focal points” for the greater society to hang on to, other than our Constitutional system of laws.  I agree with Adam, we still do have those in common… at least for the moment.

I think it’s true, one’s heritage plays a big part in how we see each other.  For example, in Spain, indigenous people all consider themselves to be Spaniards. Or, in Greece, all indigenous people consider themselves to be Greeks.  But here in America, we don’t have that common ancestral heritage to cling to. (Btw, the Native American Indian would have something to say about that!!)  So while we may each, individually, revere our familial ancestry, as a group, there is no common “heritage bond” to hold us together, like in other countries. 

Still, I love our country’s diversity.  I think it can (and in theory should) make us stronger, in a lot of ways.  I think it could (and should) be that “shining city on the hill” model to help show the rest of the world “how it’s done,” or can be done.  But that’s not what’s happening; indeed, the opposite.  

Seems our familiarity and freedoms have instead bred contempt among our people.  Like with our personal families, we can and have gotten “too comfortable” like that.  But unlike with our families, where “kinship forgiveness” seems to have a way to survive the family discord, cultural differences tend to breed a kind of paranoia and take on the form of “otherness.”

Because we are all so different, with different values and from different ethnic backgrounds, it seems too many groups want to vie for some kind of dominance in the U.S. (or feel they must defend their perceived dominance (e.g., see Whites supremacy groups).  Every group seems to aspire to get to the top of the “alpha dog” totem pole; some groups more than others.  Some just want to live in peace and rather not get involved; at least for the moment, until they one day may have the numbers to back themselves.  In the meantime, they are just happy/grateful to be here to enjoy our cornucopia.

Personally, I think that alpha dog dominance is a lot of what the MAGA movement is about.  They call it Make America Great Again, but what they really mean is, Make American WASP-y Again… because they feel they are “losing dominance control.”  That’s what all the hullabaloo is about with illegal immigration.  And, don’t get me wrong. I agree there has to be some kind of immigration controls.  I understand that too.

Okay, now for the questions:

  1. Do you agree that America has become a fractured society in the ways I’ve mentioned?  If you disagree, give your reasoning.

  2. As Adam Yoksas surmised, is the Constitution now the only “glue” that holds us together?

  3. What can make the U.S. an e pluribus unum (“out of many, one”) country again?  What is it going to take?

    1. I had suggested mandatory paid community service of some kind, say two years right out of high school, and not many here agreed with that.  They didn’t like the idea of the government controlling people in that way (even though I think it would be for our own long-term good).

    2. Is some sort of innate “human decency” a contender for bringing the US together?  Or is that kind of caring/compassion a thing of the past?  Or has paranoia and suspicion taken over a majority of us and we can’t trust anyone anymore.  Has human decency reached a low point of no return, thanks to distrust and paranoia? 

    3. [Your e pluribus unum suggestion(s) here]

  4. Is the true (root) problem here that “division is just the nature of diversity?”  In other words, a built-in problem/condition that’s never going away?

Take your time and think about it, even into the weekend. 😉😁

(by PrimalSoup)

MAGA's authoritarian subversion of the rule of law: It cannot get much clearer than this

In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true. ... Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness. -- Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951


A NYT article reports that DJT’s DoJ has fully politicized and weaponized the rule of law for federal crimes (not paywalled). What his now subverted and corrupted DoJ is doing is purely political. The situation here is Trump thug Emil Bove accepting federal prosecutor Danielle Sassoon’s resignation. 

Sassoon resigned because she refused to stop prosecuting New York City’s deeply corrupt mayor Eric Adams. To get the feds off his back, Adams sucked up to DJT, was at DJT's inauguration and probably set up a quid pro quo deal where Adams would support Trump’s immigration policies in exchange for the DoJ dismissing the case against him. After Trump’s inauguration, Adams’ legal team reached out to high-ranking DOJ officials, requesting their intervention to dismiss the charges. The corrupted DoJ complied. The honest federal prosecutor resigned. 

“The constant lying is not aimed at making the people believe a lie, but at ensuring that no one believes anything anymore. A people that can no longer distinguish between truth and lies cannot distinguish between right and wrong. And such a people, deprived of the power to think and judge, is, without knowing and willing it, completely subjected to the rule of lies. With such a people, you can do whatever you want.” -- Author unknown, A plausible restatement of Hannah Arendt’s views of the power and social effects of authoritarian demagoguery, lies and slanders

As one would expect from a chronic liar and sociopath, DJT denies any direct involvement in ordering the DOJ to dismiss the case. Well, that leaves plenty of room for direct involvement, e.g., wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

What is terrifying and beyond flagrant here are the false arguments and slanders that Bove leveled at Sasson. He falsely accuses her of doing exactly what he is corruptly doing to her. The NYT article posted Bove’s poisonous 8-page demagoguery letter with annotations at his key lies and slanders. It is worth taking a look at Bove’s toxic screed to see what I am talking about.

What we are seeing right now coming from our government is what experts on authoritarianism have documented for decades. American authoritarianism and kleptocracy are no longer hypotheticals for academics to bicker over. They are here right now and viciously aggressive. MAGA does not care if the lives of innocent, decent people are destroyed. MAGA cares only about wealth and power. 

People, this is the real deal!


To the extent that knowledge gives power, to that extent do lies affect the distribution of power; they add to that of the liar, and diminish that of the deceived, altering his choices at different levels. .... Lies foster the belief that there are more alternatives than is really the case; at other times, a lie may lead to the unnecessary loss of confidence in the best alternative. .... When we undertake to deceive others intentionally, we communicate messages meant to mislead them, meant to make them believe what we ourselves do not believe. We can do so through gesture, through disguise, by means of action or inaction, even through silence.” ― Sissela Bok, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life

MAGA updates: Musk's faux website; Regarding DJT's immunity; To the victor go the spoils

404 Media reports that Musk's highly touted government waste tracking website is the pinnacle of transparency in government. The problem is that it is an empty shell: Elon Musk's Waste.gov Is Just a WordPress Theme Placeholder Page -- Musk told reporters all of DOGE's actions are "maximally transparent." The website tracking waste is currently about an imaginary architecture firm. “Waste.gov: Tracking government waste,” the tagline for the website, archived here, says. .... “We actually are trying to be as transparent as possible. In fact, our actions—we post our actions to the DOGE handle on X, and to the DOGE website. So all of our actions, which are maximally transparent,” Musk said. “In fact, I don’t think there’s been — I don’t know the case that where [sic] an organization has been more transparent than the DOGE organization.”





Once the 404 Media reported about the faux website, Musk took it down to hide it. The images above are from the archived web site page
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________

The New Republic reports about an implication of the USSC grant of immunity to DJT that TNR spins as a setback for DJT in a lawsuit. TNR writes: "Trump’s Supreme Court Immunity Ruling Just Came Back to Bite Him -- A federal judge ruled Monday that Trump’s FBI must disclose records from its Mar-a-Lago case file, complying with a FOIA request by Bloomberg’s Jason Leopold. U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell decided that the Supreme Court’s decision—combined with his return to the White House and its executive privileges—has insulated Trump enough from further criminal prosecution to allow the release of documents."

DJT did not want the case file documents to be released. To hide the documents showing his crimes, DJT ordered the federal agency involved to argue that the government could neither to confirm or deny the existence of the requested records or information because of the possibility of DJT being prosecuted in the future for the laws he broke in his Mar-A-Lago crime spree. That's an odd argument considering the DoJ released photos of the documents.



Remember these photos from
the fun-filled past?
Ah, the good old days . . . . .

Anyway, the judge blew a raspberry at DJT's argument and said the documents had to be released because (i) the USSC gave him vast immunity from prosecution in 2024 (Trump v. US), and (ii) because a sitting president cannot be prosecuted, even without the extra wall of immunity he got in 2024. Since there was no realistic chance of him being prosecuted for any of those federal crimes, his claim of possible future prosecution was baloney.

Although TNR spun this as a setback for DJT, it is in only a very narrow sense. The documents will be released, maybe causing a moment or two of mild discomfort for him, but probably not. To me, the much bigger point is a federal judge saying that all of his past federal crimes are no longer prosecutable. That's the main point.


He didn’t get away with anything, yet.
Remember what the cynical liar Mitch McConnell said in 2021 about a former president being prosecutable?

“President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office. ... He didn’t get away with anything, yet. We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation. And former presidents are not immune from being [held] accountable by either one.”
 
Guess what? He got away with all of his federal crimes. For practical purposes, we no longer have a significant criminal or civil justice system in this country for DJT or MAGA supporters or elites he chooses to protect. And, he can protect by (1) pardoning himself or his criminal friends for federal crimes, (2) ordering his subverted Department of Justice to not prosecute himself or his criminal friends for federal crimes, (3) pressuring or coaxing state law enforcement in red states to not prosecute himself or his criminal friends for state crimes, and (4) threatening state law enforcement in blue states to not prosecute himself or his criminal friends for state crimes in those states.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________

The Independent reports an incident that shows how aggressively DKT and MAGA are using their power to obliterate inconvenient facts and truths to advance their twin authoritarian and pro-corruption policy goals: "USAID inspector fired after revealing nearly $500m in food aid was about to spoil amid Trump funding freeze -- The inspector general for the U.S. Agency for International Development was fired on Tuesday – one day after his office issued a critical report warning that nearly $500 million in food was about to go bad due to President Donald Trump’s freeze on the agency."

If one isn't mistaken, isn't letting half a billion in food spoil a form of waste? Seems so. But, the spoils here isn't the food gone bad. It's DJT and MAGA's power to fire fraud and waste watchdogs in the federal government and replace them with deeply corrupt loyalist MAGA goons. This is the new normal. Like it or not, it's time to get used to it.

 ☹️
I don't like it!

Thursday, February 13, 2025

MAGA’s incoherent social engineering

In another sign of MAGA irrationality, e.g., belief in false realities, a WaPo opinion discusses federal infrastructure spending guided by a false image of traditional family structure (not paywalled): 
The Trump administration recently issued new guidelines for the Transportation Department, surprisingly prioritizing spending and infrastructure for “communities with marriage and birth rates higher than the national average.” In other words, communities with large traditional families. .... That means rural and small-town America — presumably President Donald Trump’s core constituency — will disproportionately benefit from these funds.


Our research shows that over the past three decades, among women ages 15 to 44, marriage rates have fallen much faster for rural women than for their urban counterparts. Between 1988 and 2018, the proportion of rural women who were married fell from 55% to 33%. Marriage among urban women also declined, but to a lesser degree. 


The opinion points out that in rural areas, cohabitation rose more sharply and divorce has declined more slowly. By 2018, rural women were more likely than urban women to be in an unmarried cohabiting partnership (19 percent vs. 14 percent). The proportion of urban women who never marry is still slightly higher, mainly because urban women marry at older ages. In addition, the “baby bust” in America is larger among rural women than urban. 54% of rural children are born outside marriage compared to 45% of urban children.

Collectively, the data indicate that using marriage and family size to guide transportation funding is going to disadvantage rural regions. Once MAGA elites come to understand the stupidity of their plans, assuming they ever do, maybe they will rethink and try to come up with sensible, cost-effective transportation policy based on reality, reason and empirical data. 

Ha! MAGA understanding? Fat chance.