Conservatives elites at CPAC voice their concerns and victimhood

We deserve to know, but the GOP ain’t gonna tell us 

until after they get back in power

Then, it will be a surprise and not for the faint of heart

The New York Times writes:

.... at the Conservative Political Action Conference, the annual gathering of the right wing of American politics, the news convulsing the world seemed oddly distant. Instead, the focus was on cultural grievances, former President Donald J. Trump and the widespread sense of victimization that have replaced traditional conservative issues.

Like so many of the Republican officials who have remade themselves in his image, Mr. Trump, in a speech to the conference on Saturday night, sought to portray himself as a victim of assaults from Democrats and the news media. He said they would leave him alone if he were not a threat to seek the presidency again in 2024.

“If I said ‘I’m not going to run,’ the persecution would stop immediately,” Mr. Trump said. “They’d go on to the next victim.”

Mr. Trump had broad support at the event: Of those who responded, 85 percent said they would back him for the Republican nomination for president again, and 97 percent said they approved of his performance as president, according to a straw poll of CPAC attendees. Asked who should be the G.O.P. presidential nominee in 2024, 59 percent said Mr. Trump and 28 percent said Gov. Ron DeSantis. of Florida — though Floridians made up 37 percent of CPAC attendees.

Eight months before the midterm elections, familiar Republican themes like lower taxes and a muscular foreign policy took a back seat to the idea that America is backsliding into a woke dystopia unleashed by liberal elites. Even the G.O.P. was more than a bit suspect.

Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, a pro-Trump grass-roots group focusing on millennial conservatives, denounced “the Republican Party of old” in his speech to the conference, known as CPAC and held in Orlando, Fla., this year.

“Conservative leaders can learn something from our wonderful 45th president of the United States,” Mr. Kirk said. “I want our leaders to care more about you and our fellow countrymen than some abstract idea or abstract G.D.P. number.”

Placing cultural aggrievement at the centerpiece of their midterm campaigns comes as Republicans find themselves split on a host of issues that have typically united the party.

On Capitol Hill, Republican senators are debating whether to release an official policy agenda at all ahead of the midterms. The lack of urgency was encapsulated in a statement by Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, who dismissed a question about what Republicans would do if they took back Congress in 2022. “That is a very good question,” Mr. McConnell said. “And I’ll let you know when we take it back.”

In lieu of a united policy, Republicans are hoping that a grab bag of grievances will motivate voters who are dissatisfied with Mr. Biden’s administration. At CPAC, Republicans argued that they were the real victims of Mr. Biden’s America, citing rising inflation, undocumented immigration at the Mexican border and liberal institutions pushing racial diversity in hiring and education.

Every speaker emphasized personal connections to Mr. Trump, no matter how spurious, while others adopted both his aggrieved tone and patented hand gestures. 

Speakers largely brushed off the war in Ukraine, beyond blaming Mr. Biden, and on Friday few people mentioned Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Mr. Biden’s new choice for the Supreme Court.

John Schnatter, the pizza magnate who in 2018 resigned as chairman of the Papa John’s franchise after using a racial slur in a comment about Black people during a conference call, mingled among the crowd, saying he was among those unfairly canceled. Senator Rick Scott of Florida warned of “woke, government-run everything.”  

At CPAC, there was no shortage of stories about the horrors of cultural and political cancellations — though the speakers offered scant evidence of actual suffering.

Representative Jim Banks of Indiana, after saying he would “never, ever apologize for objecting” to Mr. Biden’s victory on Jan. 6, said he and Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio were victimized when they were removed from the House committee investigating that day’s attack on the United States Capitol in 2021.

“We both got canceled and kicked off the committee by Nancy Pelosi,” Mr. Banks said.

Regarding the unwoke, government hating liar and hypocrite Rick Scott, this is some of the introduction of his recently released 11 point plan to save America from the evil, radical socialist Democrats:

The militant left now controls the entire federal government, the news media, academia, Hollywood, and most corporate boardrooms – but they want more. They are redefining America and silencing their opponents.

Among the things they plan to change or destroy are: American history, patriotism, border security, the nuclear family, gender, traditional morality, capitalism, social responsibility, opportunity, rugged individualism, Judeo-Christian values, dissent, free speech, color blindness, law enforcement,  religious liberty, parental involvement in public schools, and private ownership of firearms.

Is this the beginning of the end of America? Only if we allow it to be.

The Biden Administration’s unprecedented combination of radical left-wing policies and gross incompetence is bringing great harm to the American people. Roaring inflation, the dangerous mismanagement of our border, the disastrous escalation of spending and debt, the shamefully inept withdrawal from Afghanistan, the use of public schools for left-wing indoctrination, and the incredible lawlessness on our streets… Americans are angry, and rightfully so. 

I’ll warn you; this plan is not for the faint of heart. 

It will be ridiculed by the ‘woke’ left, mocked by Washington insiders, and strike fear in the heart of some Republicans. At least I hope so.

It is clear that Republican Party elites with their radical fundamentalist Christian nationalism and radical laissez-faire capitalism have declared all-out culture war. So is any recognition of any the responsibility the Republican Party has for the messes it helped create and now complains bitterly of. They don't even pretend that policy is important or relevant. All that counts is power and wealth. 

Self-proclaimed GOP elite victims are intent on overthrowing democracy, the rule of law, civil liberties and secular government, schools and society. They intend to replace all of with brutal fundamentalist Christian Sharia law and autocratic kleptocratic laissez-faire capitalism. Scott is right about one thing. The Republican plan for America is not for the faint of heart. It is brutal, cruel, intolerant and bigoted. 

Oh yeah, to hell with Papa John's pizza. And papa John. 

Republican lies and irrational 

scare mongering

Escape plan…

How does Putin get out of Ukraine and still save face, something I’m sure he cares about?  Float some suggestions.

Do you think in light of the reported economic damage that’s being done to Russia and its citizens, that he wants to get out? Discuss.

Short videos on the media and a theory of stupidity

Freeze Peach 🍑 posted these videos over at Snowflake's forum. They are short but informative. The first one is a theory of how the media works. In my opinion, there is a lot of truth in it.

When one couples that with the video below about Bonhoeffer's theory of stupidity (maybe better called an aspect of human social behavior), one can see the connection between the media and the people. Interestingly, Bonhoeffer postulates that propaganda is more a social than an individual phenomenon. That is a belief I've independently come to  believe over the years based on what I've learned about human cognitive biology and social behavior. Both of these videos resonate personally. They feel basically correct.  

Meanwhile, Texas is really effed up

There is no other explanation. Texas must be Satan's proving grounds for cutting edge social engineering. The Texas Tribune reports:

Adelyn — who stands tall at 5 feet, 5 inches and is outspoken in class — had been having panic attacks in school as she approached puberty. After she started seeing the doctors in North Dallas, the attacks stopped.

But last week, the panic attacks started again when [radical right extremist] Republican Gov. Greg Abbott — seven days before the GOP primary election in which he’s being accused of not being conservative enough — ordered state child welfare officials to launch child abuse investigations into reports of transgender kids receiving gender-affirming care.

Adelyn is terrified she will be forcibly separated from her mother. So great is her anxiety that she doesn’t want to sleep in her own bed. The Vigil family agreed to speak with The Texas Tribune but did not feel safe disclosing details about Adelyn’s medical care.

Abbott’s directive followed a nonbinding legal opinion from Attorney General Ken Paxton — who is also in the fight of his political life in Tuesday’s primary election — that said gender-affirming care constitutes child abuse.

Paxton’s opinion cited body modification surgeries that medical experts say are rarely, if ever, performed on children. But he also said it would be child abuse to administer gender-affirming care that is widely accepted by leading health care groups, like puberty blockers, which are completely reversible. Under the gender-affirming model of care, experts say, more time is spent allowing kids to socially transition instead of focusing on medical treatment. 

Advocates say that calling gender-affirming therapy child abuse could lead to it being weaponized in divorce cases, create legal issues for physicians and therapists who treat transgender youth and empower people to attack the young people themselves — as well as the family members and others who support them.

“It’s not a far stretch to think that you could be harassed, assaulted, killed,” said W. Carsten Andresen, an associate professor of criminal justice at St. Edward’s University in Austin.

In case people don't know, Ken Paxton is one of the most corrupt high level politicians in America. He is currently being prosecuted for securities fraud in Texas. That he is still in office is a Mount Rushmore-level monument to the failure of the rule of law to deal with white collar criminals. He ranks right up there in criminality with our rotten ex-president. Apparently, Satan finds enough of the people of Texas willing to participate in its experiments.

Paxton denies working for Satan, but still supports Trump

Newspaper headline: 

INDICTED ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN PAXTON EPITOMIZES 

TEXAS’ EXCEPTIONALISM ON CORRUPTION

Regarding Hillary's emails and Trump's stolen classified documents

Two days ago, I posted A short history note regarding official emails and documents. Comments by TopCatDC, someone who has worked with email and records administration for Department of State, were quite interesting. His comments, copied below, cast the matter in a somewhat different light:

If you want a deep dive into what matters and what doesn't regarding Hillary Clinton's emails (primarily) and Trump's classified documents, then read on. If not, feel free to skip. I have in the past worked in email and records administration for Department of State, so I know of what I speak.

Hillary Clinton intentionally broke US Government and State Department policy by not submitting relevant emails from her private unclassified mail server to the DoS archive. Every high-level employee at State knows the requirement to preserve anything that is defined as a "record" (an official document of government business or transaction). All of her staff would be aware of this.

But, I can tell you from first-hand experience, if a Presidential appointee does not wish to comply with the rules, there is little a civil service employee can do to make it happen. Unless you want to make a complaint to the Inspector General - and we saw in the Trump Administration what happened to people who took that route.

What's more, the very use of the private server indicates this was not an oversight, but her intent from the very beginning. She clearly wanted to prevent another Whitewater and not leave documents around available for a future fishing expedition.

It was not until this omission was made public, and Congress demanded copies of emails that she submitted them to the State Department.

And even then, she delivered them as printed copies - the most labor intensive way to store them. She could have done it electronically and they would have been easily added to the archive and searchable. Again, this seems not to be a mistake, but her intention was to make this as difficult as possible. These records then had to be scanned and error-checked before they could go in to the system - a process that was very labor and time intensive - we are talking about many weeks.

That being said, the charge that she mishandled classified information was all smoke and mirrors.

While she deserved rebuke for her handling of her unclassified email - the vast majority of official State Department business is conducted on the classified system, where official messages are still sometimes called "cables". And what seemed to go unreported is that all of her classified messages were sent to the archive and available to Congress from the beginning. So, from the beginning of the Benghazi investigation(s), Congress had all of those messages. And if you want to know what the official communication was during that tragic event, it was all in the classified system.

Finally, the charge that classified information was found on her private server - that is a huge and deliberate mischaracterization. It rests on the difference between classified information and classified documents.

Classified documents (either printed or in the classified email system) are marked with their classification on every page. It is impossible to mistake what they are. What's more, there is no network link between the two systems. You can't "accidentally" copy documents from one system to the other. They are different computers, usually in different rooms. (Classified computers can only be in physically secured rooms.)

Classified information is something different. It is information that an agency has designated as classified and should only be discussed in the classified system.

Here's the problem - different agencies have different opinions on what information is classified and what isn't. And since email discussions go on between high and low ranking individuals in multiple agencies, one really has no way of knowing if someone somewhere in the US government has decided that data is classified.

What became controversial for Hillary is that there were some topics discussed in her unclassified emails that other agencies decided after-the-fact should be restricted to the classified system only. None of these emails were sent by Hillary, by the way, she was just on the receiving end, so they appeared on her server.

But, here's the thing - this is no different than what happens on the State Department Unclassified email system every day. This has nothing to do with having a private server. The data would have been just as out in the open on unclassified State Department email as on Hillary's server.

This was a total red herring publicized to make Clinton a punching bag in public.

Contrast this with President Trump who took physical documents marked "Classified" on every page out of the White House and down to his private home in Florida. Those documents can not ever leave a secured enclave or it breaks the system as a whole.

That is not only inexcusable, it directly damages US security.

And, in addition to that - why aren't those documents in the official archive?

Once again, the public has been disinformed and deceived by partisan political propaganda. Republican Party and politician hypocrisy, lies and slanders here are clear and outrageous as usual. About all that one can say about believing political rhetoric from chronic liars is caveat emptor. 

Russia update

A Washington Post headline nicely sums up an important point: E.U. to ban Russian flights from airspace as Putin puts nuclear forces on high alert. Nuclear forces on high alert means chances increase for a little mistake to have a colossal impact on civilization.

New Hampshire and a couple other states are agitating to ban Russian vodka in their states. Russian vodka constitutes about 1% of the American vodka market.

Germany to send weapons directly to Ukraine. Germany will send 1,000 anti-tank weapons and 500 Stinger missiles. Berlin has also dropped some restrictions on German-made weapons being sent to conflict zones so that third countries can send more arms to Ukraine. This is a major policy shift for Germany.

Shockingly, some or maybe most Republican politicians are criticizing Putin and his invasion. Apparently their polling must indicate that at least some of the rank and file isn't happy with Putin's unprovoked invasion so they change their tune from dictator praise to dictator criticism. But, the Republican Party Füherer, our glorious ex-president likes the invasion. Once the dust settles, coward Republican politicians will revert back to attacking democracy and kissing asses of dictators like Putin and Orban.

Putin has ordered a clamp down on news reporting, calling the Ukraine invasion either an invasion or an attack damaging misinformation. He has shut down much of what's left of an independent press in Russia. At the same time, Putin has (i) launched a massive disinformation and smear campaign about Ukraine, e.g., falsely saying that the Ukraine government is committing genocide. 

Meanwhile, social media companies are letting Putin's poison run free and wild. Good old capitalism. As usual for capitalists, profit talks and truth and democracy walk. Apple's CEO Tim Cook exemplified the capitalist response so far, Tweeting that he was "deeply concerned with the situation in Ukraine." Ukraine's digital minister Mykhailo Fedorov had posted on Twitter, "I appeal to you... to stop supplying Apple services and products to the Russian Federation, including blocking access to the Apple Store!"