Rule of law collapse update: Devon Archer's pardon

In another sign that djt holds the rule of law in cynical contempt he pardoned Devon Archer, a former associate of Hunter Biden. Archer was convicted in 2018 for his role in a fraudulent scheme that defrauded a Native American tribe. Archer scammed the Wakpamni Lake Community Corp., a business arm of the Oglala Sioux Tribe. The scheme involved fraudulent issuance and sale of over $60 million in tribal bonds. 

In his comments yesterday, djt said that Archer was "treated very unfairly" and considered him "a victim of a crime." He did not specify what crime Archer was allegedly a victim of. Archer claimed he was the target of "a convoluted lawfare effort" and had been "subjected to a complex legal campaign aimed at destroying and silencing" him. So Archer and djt are both lying liars about this.

So why did djt pardon a friend of Hunter Biden? Because Archer provided key testimony in 2023 to congressional Republicans investigating the Biden family's business dealings. He claimed that Hunter Biden sold "the illusion of access" to his father, Joe Biden.

So how what else did this get for Archer? He got out of his 1 year and 1 day jail sentence because he had not yet started serving time for his crime. The pardon also relieved Archer of paying $43,427,436 in restitution and an additional obligation to forfeit $15,700,513 was nullified. In total, the pardon erased Archer's financial obligations worth about $59,127,949 related to his criminal conviction.

This is how djt and MAGA elites treat the rule of law. For them, the law is there to serve them and their interests and to punish opposition and criticism. The day after the 2024 election, I predicted the rule of law would collapse with djt and MAGA elites being above the law. It looks like that is coming true or already is true.

MAGA poison: NPR and PBS in the crosshairs; Attacking another law firm; Europe and democracy

As I expected and predicted, MAGA elites would get around to targeting NPR and PBS sooner or later. The NYT writes: Live Updates: NPR and PBS Facing Tough Questions From Congress -- The chief executives of the biggest public media networks in the United States are expected to defend their funding and push back against accusations of media bias. Congressional Republicans are casting a harsh spotlight on PBS and NPR, America’s biggest public media networks, on Wednesday in a government hearing, lobbing accusations of media bias against the media organizations. 

One of the speakers, Mike Gonzalez, senior fellow of the conservative Heritage Foundation, is accusing public media groups of “egregious bias.” His recent book is “BLM: The Making of a New Marxist Revolution”, so we all know where this crackpot, radical right authoritarian shitshow is going. 

As would might guess from the hearing title “Anti-American Airwaves” and its organizer the radical crackpot MAGA thug Marjorie Taylor Greene, there is a ton of MAHA hostility toward NPR and PBS. Why? Because they broadcast far too much inconvenient fact, truth and sound reasoning. Seeing MAGA wanting to attack and kill NPR and PBS was brain-dead easy -- MAGA has hated both for years.

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

djt has issued another mindless, authoritarian vengeance EO that attacks another law firm that pissed him off. The NYT writes: Trump’s Old Grudge Fuels Swipe at a New Law Firm -- An executive order underscored the extent to which the president, who faced four indictments after he left office, aims to exact a price from anyone associated with past investigations of him. The order underscored the extent to which the president, who faced four criminal indictments after he left office in 2021, now aims to exact a steep price from anyone associated with past investigations of him.

The EO against the law firm Jenner & Block 1) suspends and reviews all security clearances held by J&B employees, deeming their access to classified information inconsistent with "national interest", a concept that is not defined, but means anything that can impair J&B's business, 2) directs agencies to terminate existing contracts with the firm and bars future contracting, and 3) prohibits hiring Jenner & Block attorneys for federal roles without explicit waivers. 

The EO singled out a former Robert Mueller prosecutor, Andrew Weissmann (who left the firm in 2021), as an example of J&B’s alleged "unjustified" hiring practices. Clearly, djt is going after anything with ties to investigations against him. djt continues to lie by falsely claiming that all prosecutions of him were politically motivated.

The EO lies by claiming it is based on policy disagreements and procedural concerns. The order’s timing, focus on individuals like Weissmann, and similarity to previously law firms attacked by EOs strongly indicate that this EO is for vengeance and nothing else. djt's fee-fees were hurt. The sanctions are squarely aimed at penalizing J&B for legal work that hindered Trump’s agenda and for employing attorneys linked to investigations he disfavors. As a thug dictator, he has no qualm about abusing his power to impose massive damage on those who enraged him. 

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

One of the things that was apparent to me long before the 2024 elections was that if djt got re-elected it could be catastrophic for all democracies everywhere. My Nov. 6, 2024 post included this prediction:

All global democracies will be under increasingly intense pressure to go authoritarian. The last stand for global democracy will be Europe's democracies, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and little or nothing else.

The NYT reports about increasing pressure on democracy in Europe: "Europe Talks Tough on Military Spending, but Unity Is Fracturing -- European leaders are struggling to find the money and the political will to replace the bulk of the U.S. contribution to Ukraine and to their own defense. There is an inevitable gap between talk and action, and unity is fracturing already, especially when it comes to spending and borrowing money in a period of low growth and high debt. The Dutch and others are not fans of raising collective debt for defense. Keeping Hungary on board is ever more difficult. [Former prime minister of Estonia, now the chief foreign and security official for the European Union, Kaja Kallas'] effort to get the E.U. to provide up to 40 billion euros (more than $43 billion) to Ukraine through a small, fixed percentage levy on each country’s national income has gone nowhere."

So there we have it. The EU can't even come up with a paltry $43 billion for the Ukraine. The Ukraine is screwed, which was another of my 11/6/24 predictions: There will be hideous genocide in Gaza, Lebanon and the Ukraine. The Ukraine will fall to Putin and his brutal vengeance. The slaughter will be savage.

Euro-sentiment - not good for Ukraine

Worse yet, Hungary is a dictatorship led by Viktor Orbán. He is a thug that MAGA elites and djt love and admire. He can easily extort the EU by threatening to toss sand in the gears of EU efforts to defend itself and the Ukraine. On March 8, 2024 djt hosted Orbán, praising him as "fantastic" and "the boss." djt cited Orbán as a character witness (😱) during a televised debate, quoting Orbán's support for his potential return to the presidency. Orbán has spoken at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), a gathering of MAGA elites. MAGA politicians, including senators and representatives, have attended CPAC events in Budapest, showing alignment with Orbán's policies.

Orbán at CPAC teaching MAGA

elites how to kill democracy

MAGA elites loved the lessons!

Meanwhile, authoritarian political parties are in the rise in other EU nations. It is not clear that the EU can defend itself absent kicking out a dictatorship like Hungary. Russia is slowly but surely rebuilding the old Soviet Union. Both djt and MAGA elites are in Putin's side. Traitors.

A collision: The Hegseth dustup, communications theory and pragmatic rationalism

Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980)

Communications media philosopher

This is really wonky, but I find it fascinating. A comment here yesterday about the MAGA idiot Pete Hegseth and other MAGA elites stupidly breaching national security sparked this post. 

NOTE: Nothing in this blog post is intended to shift any blame or responsibility whatsoever from the MAGA morons involved in the national security breach to any form of social media. All blame and responsibility is with Pete Hegseth and the other MAGA morons for breaching national security and djt, Hegseth and all the other morons for lying to us about it and denying actual facts. Social media may have been a non-trivial contributing factor in impairing the judgment of everyone involved, but that does not absolve them of their outrageous failure and lies to cover it up.

Comment: I'm trying to stay off for awhile, but this Hegseth dust up is an irresistible example of what annoys me most. The Screen.

Hegseth and his bros were talking on mildly secure Signal about a military attack. Did it mess up the attack? No. Were they saying anything critical to national defense? No. Did using an open app installed on otherwise secure devices create a hackers dream?..
The issue here should be the use of the internet at all.

As John Stewart said on 3/24 internet/social media is a machine. Interactive Media is a machine Designed in laboratories to change the behavior and rewire the brains of those who engage it. It is a programmed machine that programs those who use it, no matter the users intended use.
. It is NOT a conduit for speech like an old phone, and free speech has nothing to do with this problem.
He says it better than I do.
The machine takes your input, every nuance of your life on or off social media, in your car, everywhere all the time. and crafts a specific and personalized response to get you to think and do what they want.
But mention that and people invariably say, "well what do you want me to do?, The net is essential to everything. It cannot be shut down, I need it.." And they are right.
Hegseth, and the rest of the gang, are not the problem. They are there because the social media created Trump and MAGA. The media , divided us, and taught us to fear, and sold us lie after lie and we drank it all down like an abused child begging, clinging to the leg of the parent beating them to death. .
The message on the medium is not the message. The medium is the message.
The Medium is the message.
The medium is the Message.

Response: Pxy (pro-search and deep research modes):

Q1: What does the Medium is the message mean?

A1: "The medium is the message" is a phrase coined by Canadian communication theorist Marshall McLuhan in 1964. It means that the form of communication (the medium) itself has a significant impact on how the message is perceived and understood, often overshadowing the actual content of the message. The shift from oral culture to print-based ones changed societal focus from auditory to visual. Understanding this concept is crucial in today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, as it helps us anticipate and potentially shape the effects of new communication technologies on our culture and society.

Q2: Exactly why is understanding this concept crucial in today's rapidly evolving digital landscape? What is the social science data on this point?

A2: McLuhan’s axiom “the medium is the message” asserts that communication technologies—not just their content—reshape human behavior, social structures, and cultural norms. In the digital age, this principle remains critically relevant, as platforms like social media, search engines, and streaming services fundamentally alter how information is processed, identities are formed, and power is distributed. Empirical research reveals that digital mediums amplify polarization, reshape cognitive processes, and create systemic inequities in digital literacy. Understanding these effects is essential for fostering informed citizenship, mitigating misinformation, and ensuring equitable participation in a technology-driven world.

Is that about right? I think it is.

The issue here should be the use of the internet at all. .... Hegseth, and the rest of the gang, are not the problem. They are there because the social media created Trump and MAGA. The media , divided us, and taught us to fear, and sold us lie after lie and we drank it all down like an abused child begging, clinging to the leg of the parent beating them to death.

If I understand your analysis, which I might not, social media has had effects significantly more harmful than beneficial to society, knowledge generally, government, democracy, human rationality, etc. (good things generally). If that's your argument, we are in agreement. I think I have been arguing the same thing about social media for years, at least ~15, maybe ~20.

But I articulate the same (similar? overlapping?) concept differently. I don't anchor my arguments to McLuhan's insight, which I do not dispute. My anchor is human cognitive biology, social behavior and pragmatic rationalism, a pro-rationality, morals-based, anti-biasing, anti-ideology ideology (a meta-ideology according to Pxy).

Stepping back how does McLuhan fit into pragmatic rationalism , assuming it fits at all? I asked Pxy:

Q3: In what ways, if any, does the meta-ideology (anti-biasing, anti-ideology ideology) called pragmatic rationalism as described here, https://dispol.blogspot.com/2024/12/wonk-alert-perplexity-tinkering-with.html , fit with McLuhan's insight? Or, are the two concepts non-overlapping? Take steps to reduce errors from sycophancy and other sources of AI error.

A3: Pragmatic rationalism—an anti-biasing, anti-ideology framework emphasizing empirical evidence and cognitive self-awareness—intersects with Marshall McLuhan’s media theory in their shared focus on how cognitive environments shape human reasoning. While McLuhan’s axiom “the medium is the message” analyzes how communication technologies restructure perception and social organization, pragmatic rationalism seeks to counteract distortions introduced by ideological frameworks and cognitive biases. The two concepts converge in their recognition of systemic influences on cognition but diverge in their assumptions about human agency and the role of technological determinism. Empirical studies of digital polarization and algorithmic bias illustrate how McLuhan’s insights about media environments necessitate pragmatic rationalism’s methodological defenses against irrationality.

Conclusion: Complementary Lenses for a Fractured Media Landscape
Pragmatic rationalism and McLuhan’s media theory offer complementary diagnostics for contemporary epistemic crises. While pragmatic rationalism provides tools to counteract cognitive biases, McLuhan’s insights reveal why such biases emerge from media environments themselves. Together, they suggest a dual approach: reforming both individual reasoning and the media architectures that shape it. However, unresolved tensions about agency and determinism highlight the need for further research into how anti-biasing frameworks can adapt to rapidly evolving media ecologies.

Future directions might explore neuroplasticity-informed media design—creating platforms that align with pragmatic rationalism’s goals while respecting McLuhan’s warnings about technological subliminality.

Dang, that turned out to be a really interesting rabbit hole. Now I have a better feel for McLuhan. Pragmatic rationality as a tool to reform reasoning and McLuhan as as a warning. I like that a lot.

Germaine: Irrationality fighter . . . . 

. . . . and snarling watchdog of the public interest

MAGA bits: Get rid of some courts; Subvert elections; Collateral damage

NBC News reports: Facing pressure from his right flank to take on judges who have ruled against President Donald Trump, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Tuesday floated the possibility of Congress eliminating some federal courts. “We do have the authority over the federal courts, as you know. We can eliminate an entire district court. We have power of funding over the courts and all these other things,” Johnson told reporters on Tuesday. “But desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act.”

Johnson then cynically tried to downplay his comments saying that he was just making an innocent point about Congress’ “broad authority” over federal courts. What an effing liar. And he cynically claims to be a Christian.

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

Two EOs djt issued yesterday (and here) take a big step toward subverting elections to give advantage to authoritarian MAGA candidates. This move is a whopper. This is the real deal people. I knew something like this was coming. 

Key provisions include 1) a proof of citizenship requirement meaning a real ID-compliant identification, a passport or something similar, 2) states that fail to comply with the order's requirements, including using the updated national mail voter registration form, can lose federal election-related funding, 3) ballots received after election day will not be counted in federal elections, which overrides existing laws in some states, and 4) the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies will audit state voter rolls for compliance with federal requirements, probably leading to aggressive purges of likely Democratic voters from voter rolls.

Observers are raising concerns that abuse and election subversion motivate these EOs in view of how little actual voter fraud there is. This is probably going to whack mostly low-income individuals and people of color, i.e., likely Democratic voters. An estimated 21-35 million citizens could lose registration access due to documentation requirements. States losing federal funds would probably disproportionately be Democratic-leaning jurisdictions.

Although djt and MAGA elites continue to claim serious election fraud, the post 2024 election timing, focus on Democratic-leaning demographics, and reliance on disproven fraud narratives are solid evidence that the primary motive is to gain partisan electoral advantage via election subversion. There is no significant evidence of any demonstrable need for these EOs. Legal challenges under the Voting Rights Act seem to be likely given the disproportionate racial impacts.

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

djt is increasing pressure on ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and other law enforcement to massively increase the number of people being arrested and deported. Deportation quotas are not being met and djt is seriously pissed. He wants people caught, boxed up and mailed back to somewhere.

Not surprisingly, there is collateral damage. TNR writes: Trump’s Border Czar Admits ICE Is Arresting Plenty of Innocent People -- Trump’s border czar just confirmed that Immigration and Customs Enforcement is detaining innocent people. Tom Homan was asked on Fox Business Tuesday morning about whether ICE would be providing the city of Boston with information regarding the 370 people it said it arrested over the last week in the city. “We never hide anything. I can tell you that their city’s safer.… It’s safer now because [of the] actions of ICE.… We arrested 370 illegal aliens in Boston and the surrounding counties, not just Boston,” Homan said. “Majority of them were criminals. We had, you know, numerous collateral arrests. And I’ve said it before on this show and I’ll keep sayin’ it: Collateral arrests are gon’ be [going to be?] … people who aren’t criminals that are found when we’re lookin’ for the criminal are gonna be taken into custody.”

Geez, Homan talks like an uneducated, arrogant dipstick. For clarity, collateral arrest means illegal arrest.

Anyway, this MAGA assault on civil liberties aligns with the administration’s recent detainments including indiscriminate kidnappings and extraditions of hundreds of Latino men on unsubstantiated allegations of gang tattoos. And, as usual, MAGA thug Homan claims a city is safer without one shred of evidence. 

Peanut 1: Since when did due process become optional?

Peanut 2: Since we elected a fascist to run the country. MAGA is normalizing stuff like this so that people will be ok with it when random people are kidnapped to be tortured, killed, trafficked into slavery or turned into Soylent Green.

Peanut 3: But they're eating cats and dogs!

Peanut 4: These people can be injured or killed.

Peanut 5: Well yeah, but for MAGA that's a feature, not a bug. Besides, they are being arrested because ICE has a daily arrest quota or people get fired.

Sounds like some of the peanuts are not exactly happy with this turn of events.

MAGA working for you: Top notch security; Top notch service; Top notch honesty

The "best people", i.e., liars, idiots, arrogant, incompetent fools, thugs and/or crooks, that djt put in positions of serious power are starting to demonstrate their MAGA-style excellence and bestness. The NYT writes: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth disclosed war plans in an encrypted group chat that included a journalist two hours before U.S. troops launched attacks against the Houthi militia in Yemen, the White House said on Monday, confirming an account in the magazine The Atlantic. The editor in chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, wrote in an article published on Monday that he was mistakenly added to the text chat on the commercial messaging app Signal by Michael Waltz, the national security adviser.

What?? A high-level djt admin officials share US war plans in a group chat?? In my opinion, Hegseth is a grossly incompetent traitor, not just an incompetent moron. This breach of American national security intelligence is beyond outrageous. Not only was a journalist inadvertently included in the group, but the whole damned thing took place outside the secure government channels that are used for classified and highly sensitive war planning. WTF??

djt's blithe (cheerful indifference) response to the participation of djt's national security advisor, Mike Waltz, in the security breach? He stood by Waltz calling him a “good man” who had “learned a lesson.” Well, at least us Americans are learning a lesson, that's for sure. I'm not sure about djt, Hegseth, Waltz and other MAGA elites. They not only don't learn, they don't care. 

Folks, like it or not, this is just the beginning of the treasonous, kleptocratic and/or incompetence-driven sellout of America to the highest bidders. We are so screwed that calling it being screwed is an insult to screws.

Federal law criminalizes disclosure of classified information national security intelligence

Chances of this illegal disclosure being prosecuted by our MAGA DoJ? 

In my opinion, ~0.1% (~1 in 1000) in the next 4 years

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

Our MAGA-level phone service sucks! 👍: In a sign of outrageous things to come, the WaPo writes (not paywalled) about the collapse of service the SSA (Social Security Administration) provides after Musk gutted SSA services operations and fired a slew of employees: Social Security is breaking down -- The Social Security Administration website crashed four times in 10 days this month, blocking millions of retirees and disabled Americans from logging in to their online accounts because the servers were overloaded. In the field, office managers have resorted to answering phones at the front desk as receptionists because so many employees have been pushed out. But the agency no longer has a system to monitor customers’ experience with these services, because that office was eliminated as part of the cost-cutting efforts led by Elon Musk. For now, the agency is run by a caretaker leader in his sixth week on the job who has raced to push out more than 12 percent of the staff of 57,000. He has conceded that the agency’s phone service “sucks” and acknowledged that Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service is really in charge, pushing a single-minded mission to find benefits fraud despite vast evidence that the problem is overstated.

The WaPo article goes on to say that lots of people who need to access SSA services are getting pissed off. One can only wonder if people that MAGA pisses off is going to make any difference. Not so far. Time will tell.  

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

Our top notch USSC (/s) unanimously (all three idiot Democrats agreed with this MAGA stink bomb) held that although it is still illegal to lie to federal financial institution regulators, it is perfectly legal to mislead federal regulators. A BlueSky post pointed this out:

18 U.S.C. §1014 prohibits making false statements to influence the actions of federal financial agencies. In this case, a scumbag, misled the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) by making a true statement that was completely misleading. Thompson's statement was intended to influence the FDIC's action on loans by misleading the FDIC. 

The slop in the law: As usual, sloppy language (Congress, thank you for your service /s) in laws made it easy for all 9 USSC judges to allow Thompson to get off the hook for what he failed to say to the FDIC. The law criminalizes "false statements" but does not use the word "misleading. The court said that false and misleading are two different things. A misleading statement can be true. And a true statement is obviously not false. So there we have it fans of financial institution honesty in dealing with the federal government. They do not have to be honest because they can mislead. As we all know, financial institutions hire the very best misleaders that lots of money can buy. Those people are even more competent than the MAGA morons djt has put in power.

Once again, special interests talk and the public interest gets a hard kick in the nuts. For clarity, the USSC could easily have held that congress intended to include misleading statements in the law but it just didn't put that language in by accident. That would then shift the onus onto congress to clarify, in just one sentence, whether the law includes or excludes "misleading statements." But no, that is rarely how our fucked up federal courts work. The courts almost always come down on the side of the special interests over the public interest. In my opinion, that is extremely insulting bullshit. 

Chances of congress fixing this law in the next ~4 years? In my opinion, about 0.1% (~1 in 1,000).

Q: Should all nine judges be impeached, just the rotten 6, or none of 'em?

I want all 9 gone -- but don't let Germaine bias you -- you didn't see this small print stuff . . . . . it's not here . . . . it's an illusion . . .)

MAGA bit & chunk: Privatizing the post office; Killing off museums;

Newsweek reports about djt and Musk wanting to privatize everything in government that can be privatized: Protests Break Out Across US Over Plans to Change Postal Service -- It was reported in February that President Donald Trump was considering plans to transfer the USPS to the Commerce Department. Trump and his allies have also indicated they are willing to privatize the service. djt said on February 21: "We want to have a post office that works well and doesn't lose massive amounts of money. We're thinking about doing that. And it'll be a form of a merger, but it'll remain the Postal Service, and I think it'll operate a lot better." Elon Musk said at a conference earlier in March, according to Reuters: "I think logically we should privatize anything that can reasonably be privatized. I think we should privatize the Post Office and Amtrak for example … We should privatize everything we possibly can."

This is kleptocratic plutocracy in action. As usual djt and Musk are both cynical lying liars. They could not care less about making postal operations better. They just want to make a lot of money out of every privatization step they can sink their greedy, morally rotted claws into. This is no different than how the morally rotted Putin steals from the Russian people and businesses.

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

This started as a news bit, but it morphed into something bigger. What follows is a renewed focus on analyzing MAGA/djt lust for wealth and power as their primary motive for destroying the US federal government. I asked Pxy to do an in-depth analysis that includes (i) an explicit assessment of probability, and (ii) an explicit command to ferret out and get rid of errors from various sources of bias and error that can lead AI to give bad responses.

The Observer reports: Trump’s Latest Executive Order Eliminates the Institute of Museum and Library Services -- In a few short months, the Trump administration has dealt a series of blows to the American cultural and museum system, making clear from the outset that dismantling such infrastructure would be a priority on its governmental agenda. There was the reinstatement of the 2020 “Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture” memorandum. .... And most recently, the issuing of a new executive order calling for the elimination of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS)—the only federal agency specifically tasked with supporting museums—”to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law.” According to the organization, the IMLS already operated at a bare minimum, accounting for just 0.0046 percent of the overall federal budget [estimated to be ~ $335.8 million for 2025]. Meanwhile, museums contribute $50 billion to the U.S. economy annually.

Assuming the data in that article is correct, it seems odd for MAGA to target the IMLS in the name of cutting costs unless there is solid evidence of corruption. Given how djt, Musk and other MAGA elites are destroying the fed. govt., my opinion is that a far more plausible motive is lust for wealth and power.  

The Pxy analysis (Reasoning mode)

If you don't want to go through the Pxy analysis, here's the conclusion, which is no surprise in view of all the evidence: Based on strong evidence a high confidence analysis indicates that wealth and power motives are most plausible for Trump and Musk, given Musk’s regulatory conflicts, privatization of critical services, and MAGA’s erosion of institutional checks. Traditional small-government conservatism is inconsistent with MAGA’s centralized power grabs and corporate favoritism. 

At least this time, I tried to force Pxy to reduce errors from various biases. This is the 1st time I've done the analysis in an explicitly anti-bias, anti-error, pro-accuracy way.

Q3: Conduct the same analysis, but this time include a fully neutral analysis that (i) tests alternative hypotheses (e.g., anti-bureaucrat ideology, states’-rights arguments), (ii) audits sources for partisan skew (e.g., comparing Observer claims to CBO reports), and (iii) flags speculative links. My interest is in determining with as much accuracy and confidence as possible how likely it is that Trump, Musk and MAGA elites generally are driven by a wealth and power motive more than other possible motives, e.g., religion, genuine belief in very small, weak government, and genuine belief (not just lip service) that free, barely regulated markets almost always do a better job than government can. In the analysis, consider the difference between old-fashioned conservatism and attendant policies and MAGA's ideological basis, using all available public information to help inform the analysis.

A3: To assess the likelihood that wealth/power motives drive Trump, Musk, and MAGA elites—compared to ideological or governance-related motives—a neutral analysis requires weighing evidence, auditing sources, and testing alternative hypotheses.

1. Key Evidence Supporting Wealth/Power Motives

Privatization and Corporate Interests
Musk’s DOGE Role: As head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk has pushed to dismantle federal agencies (e.g., IMLS, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) while his companies (Tesla, SpaceX) hold $13B in federal contracts 1 2. This creates a direct conflict of interest, as deregulation could reduce oversight of his ventures 2 5.

Legal Incentives: Musk faces 11+ federal investigations into labor violations, fraud, and discrimination. His alignment with Trump coincides with efforts to weaken regulatory bodies probing his businesses 2 5.

Economic Impact: The IMLS represents 0.0046% of the federal budget ($335.8M) but generates $50B in economic activity. Eliminating it provides negligible fiscal savings, undermining claims of cost-cutting 4 8.

Centralization of Power

Unprecedented Authority: Trump’s delegation of executive power to Musk—allowing him to bypass Congress and terminate federal employees—has no historical precedent 1 10.

Anti-Democratic Shifts: Musk’s public statements frame democracy as incompatible with bureaucratic oversight, advocating for a "streamlined" government controlled by unelected officials1 12.

Partisan Source Bias

Left-leaning outlets (Observer, Common Dreams) emphasize corruption and profit motives. However, factual overlaps (e.g., Musk’s contracts, investigations) remain consistent across sources 1 2 5.

Neutral sources (Britannica, Sciences Po) confirm MAGA’s anti-establishment rhetoric coexists with elite alliances, noting a shift toward “pluto-populism” 11 12.

2. Testing Alternative Hypotheses

Hypothesis 1: Anti-Bureaucrat Ideology
Evidence For: MAGA rhetoric criticizes “deep state” inefficiency. The IMLS employs only 75 workers, aligning with small-government optics 3 8.

Evidence Against: Traditional conservatism prioritizes state/local governance, yet the executive order targets IMLS’s statutory functions (e.g., Grants to States), contradicting states’-rights principles 3. Musk’s focus on privatizable sectors (libraries, USPS) over larger agencies suggests selective, profit-driven targeting 3 8.

Hypothesis 2: Genuine Belief in Free Markets
Evidence For: Trump’s tax cuts and Musk’s deregulation advocacy (e.g., opposing NLRB, FAA) align with libertarian ideals 2 5.

Evidence Against: MAGA’s tariffs, immigration restrictions, and industrial policies contradict free-market principles, prioritizing nationalist over economic goals 14. Musk’s reliance on federal contracts ($13B) and subsidies (e.g., SpaceX’s $1.8B NRO deal) undermines claims of opposing government intervention 5 12. 

Hypothesis 3: Religious/Cultural Conservatism
Evidence For: MAGA’s opposition to DEI initiatives and “woke” narratives could align with conservative cultural values 6 11.

Evidence Against: IMLS cuts harm rural, religious communities reliant on libraries for services 3 8. Trump/Musk prioritize corporate interests (e.g., crypto, AI) over traditional issues like abortion or religious liberty 10 14.

4. Confidence and Uncertainty

High Confidence: Wealth/power motives are primary drivers for Musk (regulatory avoidance, contract retention) and Trump (consolidating executive authority). The IMLS’s minimal cost and maximal ROI make fiscal arguments implausible 4 8.

Moderate Confidence: Anti-bureaucrat ideology is secondary, used to legitimize privatization benefiting elites. MAGA’s policy contradictions (e.g., tariffs vs. free markets) weaken ideological consistency 14.

Low Confidence: Claims of direct quid pro quo (e.g., Musk’s DOGE role ➔ profit) rely on circumstantial evidence. Partisan sources overstate coordination 1 2.

5. Speculative Links Flagged
Musk’s “Broligarchy”: Sciences Po’s “Muskoligarchy” theory posits a tech-industrial complex takeover. While Musk’s influence is unprecedented, no evidence confirms a coordinated elite cabal 12.

Bannon-Musk Feud: Conflicts over immigration (H-1B visas) suggest MAGA’s internal divisions, not unified ideology 13.

Conclusion
Wealth and power motives are most plausible for Trump and Musk, given Musk’s regulatory conflicts, privatization of critical services, and MAGA’s erosion of institutional checks. Traditional small-government conservatism is inconsistent with MAGA’s centralized power grabs and corporate favoritism. While anti-bureaucrat rhetoric exists, it primarily masks elite enrichment. Neutral analysis confirms:

Strength of Evidence: High for profit/power motives (direct financial ties, legal incentives).

Weakness of Alternatives: Anti-bureaucrat/states’-rights arguments lack consistency; cultural motives are peripheral.

This assessment acknowledges left-leaning source bias but finds convergent factual support across partisan and neutral reports.