Other likely topics include 1. economic sustainability, budget, tax gap, taxation, wealth distribution,2. health care, 3. immigration, 4. jobs, 5. environment, 6. foreign policy, 7. education, 8. church-state separation, and 9. social policy, racism and social polarization, safety net spending.
This post centers on defense of democracy and means to rebuild trust among Americans toward democracy, democratic institutions and fellow citizens. A defense of both are sorely needed because both have been under sustained attack for years. Several of the policy proposals are taken from HR1, the first major legislation the democratic House passed after taking control in January 2019. The Senate majority leader has promised to block the bill, so there is no chance of HR1 becoming law as long as the GOP controls the Senate or the White House.
Defense of democracy and trust-building – anti-corruption, anti-tyranny, pro-transparency
Rationale
|
|
1. Public campaign financing: Provide $1-5 in public
funds to match each $1 in direct or indirect private funding for candidates
and political parties
|
Public opinion: about 65% of Americans want the
role of special interest money in politics reduced; Reality: private
entities backed by campaign contributions write laws for their own benefit
not for the public interest; the process is usually cloaked in secrecy to
hide the truth of law-making from the public; Cost: Unknown; estimate
$1-5 billion initially; Benefit: public financing will at least
partially reduce special interest money influence and partially counteract
the propaganda and lies that special interests and many or most politicians routinely
employ against the public
|
2. Tax returns: At least 45 days before a primary,
general or special election, all candidates for federal office and all
federal judges must make public their tax returns for the previous 6 years
All senior federal employees must make public their tax
returns for the previous 4 years within 60 days after passage of this law and
at least 45 days before they assume a new senior federal position
|
Public opinion: 59% of Americans believe it is necessary
for presidential candidates to publicly release their tax returns; Reality:
Requiring elected federal officials, judges and senior bureaucrats to
publicly disclose their tax returns shows possible illegal conflicts of
interest and that is evidence the person’s loyalty is to the constitution,
the rule of law and the public interest, not self-interest; Cost: very
low; some persons will refuse to disclose, resulting in loss of those
politicians and employees; Benefit: transparency increases and
disclosure provides a basis for trust that politicians, judges and
bureaucrats are not conflicted or tax cheats
|
3. Campaign financing transparency: Super
PACs and “dark money” political organizations must make their donors public
within 2 weeks of any donation; violation is a felony and carries a minimum
mandatory jail term of no less than 10 months for the first conviction and 24
months for each subsequent conviction
|
Public opinion: about 65% of Americans want the
role of special interest money in politics reduced; Reality: private
entities backed by campaign contributions usually go to the limit of the law
or beyond to avoid disclosing their identities; most wealthy individuals and
interests fight against transparency to hide the real extent of their
influence over government from the public; Cost: very low; Benefit:
transparency increases and disclosure provides a basis for the public to see
how much money private sector special interests spend to buy influence over politicians
and laws
|
4. Campaign and government operations transparency:
Require social media, including Facebook and Twitter, to disclose the source
of money for political ads on their platforms and disclose how much money was
or will be spent within 2 weeks of the order for the ads
Require disclosure of any political spending by government
contractors to show the flow of domestic and foreign money into the elections
by targeting shell companies and all other sources of money into federal
politics
Strengthen law and oversight to prohibit any coordination
between candidates and Super PACs
Violation is a felony and carries a minimum mandatory jail
term of no less than 10 months for the first conviction and 24 months for
each subsequent conviction
|
Public opinion: about 65% of Americans want the
role of special interest money in politics reduced; Reality: private
entities and foreign adversaries, including Russia and China, pay for
propaganda and lies on social media to undermine trust in democracy,
democratic institutions and trust in fellow citizens; these efforts are
successful and have adversely influenced American society and social harmony;
Cost: very low; Benefit: transparency increases and disclosure
provides a basis for the public to see how much money foreign adversaries and
domestic special interests spend to buy influence over politicians and laws
|
5. Anti-corruption and ethics: Ethics
opinions by the Office of Government Ethics are binding, not advisory; all
appearances, even tenuous appearances, of any kind of a conflict of interest
are strictly prohibited, as are all actual conflicts of interest of any kind;
expand the power of the Office of Government Ethics to do more oversight and
enforcement; establish stricter lobbying registration requirements, including
more oversight of foreign agents by the Foreign Agents Registration Act
All ethics opinions are to be made public to the maximum
extent possible as soon as possible
|
Public opinion: a majority of Americans' views of
government remain negative; trust and approval ratings of the executive and
legislative branches is low; Reality: Ethics has been reduced to at
least an appearance of being relatively ineffective in fighting against both
opacity and conflicts of interest; majorities hold unfavorable views of both
major political parties; Cost: estimate tens of millions in added
oversight and enforcement costs; some possible loss of federal employees due
to refusal to comply; Benefit: transparency increases and ethics is
elevated to a status of mandatory compliance; ethics is returned to a status
of having real impact on all federal employees and that provides the public
with some empirical basis for trust in terms of ethics, transparency and
conflicts of interest
|
6. Vote integrity, vote participation and voter
registration: Create automatic national voter registration that asks
voters to opt out, rather than opt in; shift responsibility to states to
maximize voter registration with loss of federal infrastructure or other funds
for states that fail to register at least 95% of eligible voters
Mandatory early voting at least one week before any
election
Election Day is a holiday for federal employees and
private sector businesses are strongly encouraged to do the same where
possible; move elections from Tuesdays to Saturdays or Sundays
Require poll workers to provide a two week notice if poll
sites are to be changed; make colleges and universities a voter registration
agency, in addition to the DMV, etc.
End partisan gerrymandering in federal elections and
prohibit voter roll purging; prohibit use of non-forwardable mail to remove
voters from rolls
Increase election security, including requiring the
director of national intelligence to do regular checks on foreign threats and
make public as much of the findings as national security permits; provide
federal funding for security measures
Impose a tax penalty for eligible voters who do not vote,
unless they are unable to vote for good reason, for example, $25 for low
income non-voters, $200 for middle income non-voters, and $10,000 for high
income non-voters; adjust penalty rates up or down to attain at least 85%
voter participation by imposing the lowest effective penalty
Conduct a mandatory evaluation of electoral changes such
as a national popular vote for president and ranked choice voting; make the
findings public
|
Public opinion: 74% of Americans believe that
voting is a top priority for good citizenship; Reality: voter
participation is under attack, primarily or completely by conservatives
falsely claiming massive voter fraud and other untrue reasons; voter purges
and other measures that conservatives tend to implement amount to voter
suppression, not fraud prevention; Cost: unknown; estimate tens of
millions to hundreds of millions in the first election cycle, with costs
possibly decreasing for election cycles thereafter; Benefit: voter
participation increases; voting is easier for more people; the tax penalty
incentivizes voting
|
7. Legislative transparency and public opinion:
For all new significant or ‘qualifying’ laws from congress (spending or
saving more than $100 million), conduct fair and neutral but rigorous opinion
polling to determine the level of public support and opposition for the law;
for laws where reliable public opinion data exists, that can replace the
polling requirement
Congressional supporters and opponents must attach to each
new qualifying law a detailed rationale (no less than 3,000 words with no
upper limit) for their support or opposition, including a detailed list of
individuals and business entities that directly or indirectly contributed
money or promises of anything of present or future value to support or oppose
the law, what and how much was contributed, and how much key legislators who
supported and opposed the law received; the rationale must be complete and as
transparent as existing law allows, and if existing law does not allow a
complete, honest rationale, then all interested parties are given notice that
privacy, trade secrets or any other information they want kept secret will
not be heard or considered in drafting of the law so that the public can be
fully informed; when private sector individuals or attorneys draft any
qualifying law or any part thereof, their identities, contributed language
and employers must be included in the rationale
The detailed rationale must clearly and directly identify
the key facts, key assumptions and lines of reasoning for support of, or
opposition to, the qualifying law; it must also provide an honest assessment
of all significant positive and negative impacts on all significantly
affected individuals, groups and entities
The detailed rationale must be made public at least 2
weeks before it can be sent to the president for acceptance or veto
Failure to provide a timely complete and honest rationale
is a felony and carries a minimum mandatory jail term on the individuals
responsible (at least one person in congress on each side and optionally one
or more other federal employees on each side, including all private sector
individuals who wrote any of the law) for failing to provide the detailed
rationales; the jail term will be no less than 10 months for the first
conviction and 24 months for each subsequent conviction
|
Public opinion: unknown; Reality: research
data suggests that public opinion is irrelevant in affecting policy choices
and laws; wealthy individuals and organized special interests dictate policy,
not public opinion; public trust in congress is low and opacity in
legislating is a major reason for that distrust; Cost: unknown, likely
hundreds of millions per year; legislation may be slowed more than it is now;
Benefit: the public is shown (i) the rationale of both supporters and
opponents for why they support or oppose any new law, (ii) who contributed
how much to whom, and (iii) who wrote what portions of each law; light is
shed on the legislative process and that affords the public with some basis
for trust in congressional legislation
|
Information sources:
Proposals 1, 3, 4. Poll: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/05/08/most-americans-want-to-limit-campaign-spending-say-big-donors-have-greater-political-influence/
Proposal 2. Poll: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/19/us/politics/poll-presidential-race.html
Proposal 5. Poll: https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/221171/americans-perceive-government-2017.aspx
Proposal 6. Poll: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/02/what-makes-a-good-citizen-voting-paying-taxes-following-the-law-top-list/
Proposal 7. Poll: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx
https://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/is-america-an-oligarchy
No comments:
Post a Comment