Other than books about math, science, or any other “settled facts” (i.e., schooling-type books), aren’t all other books just someone’s point of view; someone making an argument from their perspective? Might they even be seen as a form of attempted propaganda?
If so, can such books be seen as "dangerous," depending on the author’s motive?
And who will be the check on their potential Dark Free Speech influence? Is a book full of subjective lies just another case for the promoting of free speech, much like social media’s threat of DFS?
Is a book “good” if you agree with it, and “bad” if you don’t?
Talk about “books.”
(by PrimalSoup)