Various bits: About radical right tactics; Etc.

An opinion piece by Naomi Oreskes in Scientific American comments on social security (SS). For context, Oreskes is hated by the radical right and big corporations. She is a science history professor at Harvard and an outspoken myth buster and lies attacker. Among other targets, she publicly attacks radical right climate science myths and the public relations (propaganda) lies and deceit campaigns that pro-pollution giants like Exxon-Mobil spew onto the public. Oreskes writes about why the radical right hates the SS program:

False ‘Facts’ about Science and Social Security Share Origins

Fake claims that Social Security is broken and that climate action isn’t urgent all come from flawed free-market ideology

Whether they work on climate change, evolution, vaccine safety, or any of a host of other issues, scientists frequently face resistance from people offering “alternative facts.” How did we come to live in a world where so many people feel vaguely supported opinions are just as valid as evidence-based scientific research—where people can't tell the difference between opinion and fact?

Part of the answer involves the long-standing efforts of the tobacco industry to deny evidence about tobacco's harms and of the fossil-fuel industry to confound understanding about climate change. These campaigns have undermined confidence in the idea that large amounts of scientific evidence produce a more accurate view of the world than do a few dissenting thoughts.

But there's another source for these doubts: the attack of conservative politicians on the U.S. Social Security program, which gives financial security to senior citizens. Republicans in Congress have recently threatened drastic cuts to Social Security and even privatization. Their ostensible reason is the need to balance the federal budget. “The numbers can't work” without big cuts to Social Security, former Republican finance committee aide Chris Campbell has declared. In fact, Social Security isn't a drain on the federal budget; it pays for itself through a dedicated payroll tax.

Why do conservatives keep attacking a successful program that pays for itself? Because of its success. Social Security is “big government” that works. Its accomplishments refute the conservative refrain that federal programs are costly failures and that the government should just leave things to the free market.

Some people like Oreskes claim that SS pays for itself (citing the US government itself), while others say it does not. Regardless, one can think that if congress had not sabotaged SS by plundering it, the program would be closer to paying for itself than it is now. But that's not why I posted this.

I posted this to point out that I am not alone in stridently arguing that the radical right Republican Party virulently hates successful government, especially domestic spending safety net programs. That hate leads the GOP in congress and the White House to sabotage success so they can howl that government never works. Then they argue that the programs they broke need to be eliminated and replaced by the always better free markets and private sector actors. 

As usual, keep your eyes on the intended flow of power by attacking domestic spending. Power flows away from government and the protections that affords to citizens. That power flows to corporations, and private sector interests who are then free to exercise that new power over citizens.

That is why I call the radical right Republican Party, radical right Christian nationalism and radical brass knuckles capitalism authoritarian or fascist. More power and wealth for elites and special interests and less democracy and civil liberties for average citizens is what all three stand for.  

___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Meanwhile, at the Westminster dog show:

___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Christofascism in Texas update: A WaPo opinion opines:

.... Republicans in the Texas legislature [are] advancing a bill requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom in the state.

Texas is growing more purple with each passing year, which is exactly why the Republican-dominated legislature is reasserting the right’s political and cultural power with ever more radically conservative laws. Part of that effort is a series of bills meant to impose not just religion but Christianity into public schools.

One bill would allow schools to mandate “a period of prayer and Bible reading on each school day.” Another says school personnel must be allowed to “engage in religious speech or prayer while on duty.” Yet another would allow schools to replace school counselors with “chaplains” — no training or certification required. The centerpiece is the bill requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments, which has already passed the state Senate.

___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

A slew of increasingly agitated articles about the impending debt default are appearing. It looks like a lot of folks are getting scared. An article The Hill published today captures some of the growing anxiety: 

Financial markets brace for default as Biden, Republicans dig in on debt limit

The partisan standoff over the debt limit, which hardened over the weekend when 43 Senate Republicans said they would not support a clean debt-limit increase, sets the stage for severe turbulence in the financial markets, experts warn.

The yield on Treasury bonds maturing next month spiked last week, signaling that investors are already preparing for the possibility that President Biden and Republican leaders in Congress won’t reach a deal before the Treasury Department runs out of money next month.

Hm. Severe turbulence. That doesn't sound good. ☔ 

___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Al Jazeera opines on the state of American democracy:

Republicans are pushing American democracy to its breaking point

They are working within the boundaries of the democratic system in order to tear it down

In this state [Tennessee] and elsewhere around the country, Republicans have been pressure-testing the strength and limits of democracy, seeing where they can violate and erode the rules and norms of democracy in order to gain and hold office and push through conservative laws and policies.

The ACLU says since 2021, 10 states have enacted anti-critical race theory laws that attack “our First Amendment rights to read, learn, and discuss vital topics in schools”, with over two dozen additional anti-CRT laws proposed in 2022 alone.  

In addition to suppressing vital civil rights, Republican governors and state legislators are also actively engaged in efforts to undermine the power of voters, efforts that Brennan Center fellow Zachary Roth calls “legislative anti-democracy”. These moves have included heightened efforts at gerrymandering; reconfiguring the way Electoral College votes are allocated to favor Republican candidates; making direct democracy, such as ballot initiatives, more difficult to achieve; and using state laws to negate or undermine more liberal local municipalities.

Even Al Jazeera doesn't get it, even when it writes about it. What radical right Republican elites are doing isn't conservative or conservatism. It is radical right authoritarianism. Plutocratic-autocratic fascism and Christofascism in my opinion.

By continuing to call radical right authoritarianism conservative, the stunningly clueless media normalizes what cannot be normalized in a democracy. It can be normalized in a tyranny or theocracy, but not a democracy. The Republican Party is normalizing tyranny and the stupid media abets it.