Over at Rick Wilson’s Against All Enemies anti-autocracy substack, Wilson nicely articulates how Trump and the MAGA demagoguery machine con people into accepting tyranny and corruption. His essay, The Coming Election Takeover, is another warning about what Trump and MAGA elites want to do to the 2026 midterm and later elections if they can pull it off. The joke-to-policy tactic has been seen multiple times. The tactic plays out generally like this:
- In his public rants or social media posts, Trump floats an extreme, anti-democratic, anti-rule of law idea or anti-civil liberties idea. This signals his intent and the goal of the threat.
- Authoritarian MAGA media characterizes his extremism and pro-tyranny intentions as just innocent jokes that are misunderstood or taken out of context. People who can’t see the threat as a joke are dismissed as humorless, irrational, mentally defective, or “snowflakes” who can’t take a joke. MAGA rejects criticisms out of hand as nonsense or bad faith smears. That allows MAGA to avoid dealing with legitimate criticisms of real anti-democracy threats.
- MAGA propaganda then spins the threat as Trump having made a good, legitimate point.
- Then there is an Executive Order or bill in congress.
- Then Trump’s anti-democracy/anti-rule of law/anti-civil liberties threat becomes policy or law and the new norm from with to launch further MAGA tyranny attacks.
Wilson describes the process like this: “The MAGA media apparatus of Fox, Newsmax, CBS, the Twitter-poisoned podcast bros, and the MAGA Influencer-Industrial Complex fan out to tut-tut the horrified for being humorless scolds. He was kidding. You people are unhinged. Touch grass. Then, a beat later: well, he was kidding, but you have to admit he has a point. Then, a draft executive order leaks. Then it’s policy. Then it’s the law. Then it’s the new floor, and the next joke starts the cycle again, one rung lower”.
Regarding elections
Wilson points out that Trump has used joke-to-policy to attack the 2026 mid-term elections. First Trump says something outrageous like “maybe we shouldn’t have an election”. MAGA media propaganda frames it as either an unserious joke or raising a good point. Clearly, that was no joke. Then lawyers and politicians start drafting ways to translate the autocratic attack into practice. Ways to do that include Trump (1) issuing Executive Orders, (2) claiming and emergency and emergency powers, and (3) deploying his federal enforcers (ICE, FBI, etc.) or investigators (DOJ, etc.). For 2026, the joke-to-policy cycle is aimed at creating a legal and administrative framework to allow Trump’s team to disregard or override state-run election outcomes. The point of that kind of attack is to allow anti-election policy implementation with few or no lawsuits or court interventions.
Q1: Is the joke-to-policy argument mostly or completely false, or is it reasonably accurate in view of the evidence in the public record?
Q2: By treating serious objections to Trump’s tyrannical or corrupt threats as a failure to appreciate humor, (1) does MAGA rhetoric deflect from answering substantive criticism, (2) which turns politics into a culture war over who is “in on the joke” versus who is an unreasonable uptight enemy, or a humorless snowflake or crackpot?
Info sources:
“MAGA ‘secret’ exposed by ex-GOP operative as Republicans watch their ‘numbers go south’.”
‘Packaging evil into something funny’: is making fun of Trump now just ‘clownwashing’?
Jacob Neiheisel on How Trump Uses Humor and Labels to Divide
No comments:
Post a Comment