Etiquette



DP Etiquette

First rule: Don't be a jackass.

Other rules: Do not attack or insult people you disagree with. Engage with facts, logic and beliefs. Out of respect for others, please provide some sources for the facts and truths you rely on if you are asked for that. If emotion is getting out of hand, get it back in hand. To limit dehumanizing people, don't call people or whole groups of people disrespectful names, e.g., stupid, dumb or liar. Insulting people is counterproductive to rational discussion. Insult makes people angry and defensive. All points of view are welcome, right, center, left and elsewhere. Just disagree, but don't be belligerent or reject inconvenient facts, truths or defensible reasoning.

Thursday, March 9, 2023

News bits: An odd court decision whacks the bad guys for being bad; Etc.

Right-wing activists Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman’s robocalls targeting Black voters violated the Voting Rights Act and Ku Klux Klan Act — and the question isn’t close enough to require a jury, a federal judge ruled.

[The judge said that] the evidence “establishes that the neighborhoods that Defendants targeted were not accidental or random,” finding that a reasonable jury couldn’t escape the conclusion that the pair wanted to “deny the right to vote specifically to Black voters.”

Recorded by a woman identifying herself as “Tamika Taylor,” the robocalls largely targeted diverse regions with the false message that “if you vote by mail, your personal information will be part of a public database that will be used by police departments to track down old warrants, and [will] be used by credit card companies to collect outstanding debt.”

Though Wohl and Burkman painted themselves as “goofballs and political hucksters with an irreverent sense of humor,” Judge Marrero rejected that the robocalls were “mere hyperbole.”
If the Republican Supreme Court takes this case up, it will try to find a way to let these two Republican vote fraudsters off the hook on free speech grounds. After all, Republicans use the law to protect their own and savage those they hate and politically oppose.

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

Ukraine update: The NYT writes: “Russia Lacks Firepower to Keep Advancing, U.S. Intelligence Chief Says.”

That’s not credible. Maybe it will be credible when it happens. Another pulse check in six months might to shed enough fact-based light on this to come to a reasonably fact-based opinion.

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________


The WaPo writes: “Russia fires barrage of hypersonic missiles, piercing Ukrainian air defenses.”

Russia continues happily to pulverize Ukraine into the stone age.

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________


Morally bankrupt American military: The NYT writes: “Pentagon Blocks Sharing Evidence of Possible Russian War Crimes With Hague Court. American military leaders oppose helping the court investigate Russians because they fear setting a precedent that might help pave the way for it to prosecute Americans.”

Biden and State Department want to turn the evidence over. The US military fears prosecutions of its personnel. If the Pentagon stopped doing things that create liability for prosecutions, this would not be a concern. 

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

From the Pissed Off Catholics Files: The WaPo writes about an investigation it launched into this odd story: “A group of conservative Colorado Catholics has spent millions of dollars to buy mobile app tracking data that identified priests who used gay dating and hookup apps and then shared it with bishops around the country. The secretive effort was the work of a Denver nonprofit called Catholic Laity and Clergy for Renewal .... The use of data is emblematic of a new surveillance frontier in which private individuals can potentially track other Americans’ locations and activities using commercially available information. No U.S. data privacy laws prohibit the sale of this data.”

Personal privacy online is just about non-existent. How many priests will get axed from this little fishing expedition is an interesting question.

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________


From the Snarky Columnist Files: A WaPo opinion by Alexandra Petri opines, snarking on the Faux News and Tucker Carlson spinning the 1/6 coup attempt into a harmless, fat-free nothingburger:
I got an advance transcript of Tucker Carlson’s next several shows, operating under the same premise as his recently released, selectively edited Jan. 6 coverage! It follows.

Viewers! For too long, Big Paleontology and the mainstream media have lied to you, saying that the planet was hit by a meteorite that caused dinosaurs to go extinct. That’s what they want you to think. But I’ve looked at the footage and — it’s just not the case. For the overwhelming, vast majority of the time that dinosaurs were walking around on Earth, there’s not a single meteorite to be seen.

Mostly, the dinosaurs were not impacted by a meteorite, actually. Finally, someone with the courage to say it. It makes you wonder: What else are they keeping from us?

Next, we will observe footage that reveals Abraham Lincoln was mostly not assassinated — I have almost an hour of footage of him enjoying a theater performance without incident! And footage showing that for the overwhelming majority of his life, Elvis was alive. Next, lots of footage of the Hindenburg flying without a single problem! Makes you wonder who stood to gain by painting it as a disaster! 
Faux News and Carlson are doubling down and saying the 1/6 coup attempt was peaceful and lawful. They have to double down or lose audience share. For Faux, as we all know, concern for profit is first, while truth is a distant third behind 2nd place audience share.  


Tucker showing the peaceful patriotism  
of the 1/6 coup attempt

What Tucker Carlson Really Thinks of Trump? "I Hate Him Passionately."

Tucker Carlson has been a central proponent of Trump and the MAGA movement in the GOP. He's a trusted go-to source for the MAGA troops, and in the past I have even heard rumors of his running for president in 2024. But, like a lot of other people, I've always had the suspicion that he's a phony who runs a lucrative business telling Fox audiences what they want to hear. It looks like there's something to that hunch according to recently obtained private comments Carlson made which have surfaced in the context of the Dominion Voting Systems defamation suit. The following is an excerpt of a NYT article published yesterday.

_________________________________________

NYT: 3/8/23

Here are five examples of Mr. Carlson’s views on Mr. Trump from the documents:

Nov. 6, 2020

As votes were being counted in the 2020 presidential election, Mr. Carlson texted with his producer, Alex Pfeiffer, fretting about viewers turning away from Fox News after the network called Arizona for President Biden.

Alex Pfeiffer: Trump has a pretty low rate at success in his business ventures.

Tucker Carlson: That’s for sure. All of them fail. What he’s good at is destroying things. He’s the undisputed world champion of that.

Nov. 10, 2020

A staff member texted Mr. Carlson to say they’d heard Mr. Trump was planning not to attend the inauguration, an important symbol of the peaceful transfer of power.

Carlson: I’d heard that about the inauguration. Hard to believe. So destructive.

Carlson: It’s disgusting. I’m trying to look away.

Nov. 23, 2020

Mr. Carlson texts with the Fox News host Laura Ingraham about Sidney Powell, a lawyer for Mr. Trump and one of the biggest promoters of the unfounded election fraud claims.

Carlson: I had to try to make the WH disavow her, which they obviously should have done long before.

Laura Ingraham: No serious lawyer could believe what they were saying.

Carlson: But they said nothing in public. Pretty disgusting. And now Trump, I learned this morning, is sitting back and letting them lose the senate. He doesn’t care. I care.

Jan. 4, 2021

Mr. Carlson texts with members of his staff, two months after the 2020 election and two days before the insurrection at the Capitol building, about looking forward to not having to cover Mr. Trump.

Carlson: We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can’t wait.

Carlson: I hate him passionately.

Jan. 7, 2021

After the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, Mr. Carlson texts with Mr. Pfeiffer about Mr. Trump’s culpability in the insurrection and how to deal with viewers who still support him. It was two weeks before the inauguration of President Biden.

Carlson: Trump has two weeks left. Once he’s out, he becomes incalculably less powerful, even in the minds of his supporters.

Carlson: He’s a demonic force, a destroyer. But he’s not going to destroy us. I’ve been thinking about this every day for four years.

Pfeiffer: You’re right. I don’t want to let him destroy me either. [REDACTED]. The Trump anger spiral is vicious.

Carlson: That’s for sure. Deadly. It almost consumed me in November when Sidney Powell attacked us. It was very difficult to regain emotional control, but I knew I had to. We’ve got two weeks left. We can do this.

 

 Full article here: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/business/media/tucker-carlson-trump.html?campaign_id=190&emc=edit_ufn_2023

 

Wednesday, March 8, 2023

News bits: Abortions wars; Election wars; More abortion wars

I post about abortion wars because it is one of the culture war issues where we can often or usually clearly see radical right progress. What is happening with that issue is also coming to us now with other issues the authoritarian-theocratic radical right has both (i) demagogued, and (ii) the power to conduct nationwide social warfare. Politico writes about how Christian nationalist (CN) Republican politicians in power are slowly forcing companies to comply with CN religious dogmas:
Walgreens won’t distribute abortion pills in states where GOP AGs object

The nation’s second-largest pharmacy chain confirmed Thursday that it will not dispense abortion pills in several states where they remain legal — acting out of an abundance of caution amid a shifting policy landscape, threats from state officials and pressure from anti-abortion activists.

Nearly two dozen Republican state attorneys general wrote to Walgreens in February, threatening legal action if the company began distributing the drugs, which have become the nation’s most popular method for ending a pregnancy.

The company told POLITICO that it has since responded to all the officials, assuring them that they will not dispense abortion pills either by mail or at their brick-and-mortar locations in those states.

The list includes several states where abortion in general, and the medications specifically, remain legal — including Alaska, Iowa, Kansas and Montana.  
“In my letter to Walgreens, we made clear that Kansas will not hesitate to enforce the laws against mailing and dispensing abortion pills, including bringing a RICO action to enforce the federal law prohibiting the mailing of abortion pills,” Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach said in a statement.
Some activists want people to boycott Walgreens for stopping sales in states where at least some abortion is still legal, at least for now. 

Q: Do you see this an an example of anti-democratic social warfare being waged by radical right authoritarian, theocratic CN warriors with the Republican Party being the CN's Department of War? If not that, what would you call it?

______________________________________________________________
 ______________________________________________________________ 


The latest radical right attack on election integrity: The radical right is mounting major nationwide attack on election integrity. It will make widespread vote fraud easier. The WaPo writes:
At a time of hyperpolarization over voting and elections, Democrats and Republicans had largely managed to agree on one thing — that a little-known data-sharing consortium of more than 30 states has helped keep voter rolls updated and free of opportunities for fraud.

But the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), as the consortium is known, has been straining lately under the weight of accusations and misinformation from election deniers. Critics, some of whom have aligned themselves with the false stolen-election narrative of former president Donald Trump, have claimed that the group is actually a left-wing vehicle that shares sensitive voter data with liberal groups, encourages bloated and inaccurate rolls and enables the very fraud it is intended to stamp out. ERIC’s leaders deny these accusations.

Now, ERIC’s survival is in jeopardy, with Republican-led states withdrawing, others threatening to do so and heated disputes breaking out among members over how to save the organization. Should ERIC collapse, its boosters say the country would lose one of its most powerful tools for keeping ballot fraud at bay just as states are beginning to prepare for the 2024 election calendar.

“Why would people who purport to want more election integrity seek to damage the best tool out there?” asked David Becker, who helped found ERIC in 2012 with seven states when he led the elections program at the Pew Charitable Trusts and watched it grow over the ensuing decade. “The only thing I can come up with is they don’t actually want election integrity. They want more chaos.”

ERIC’s founding members thought they had devised the perfect way to impose sound voter-roll practices on states while keeping Republicans and Democrats happy in an area fraught with mutual suspicions. .... The system can also be used to help identify and prosecute those who have double-voted across state lines.
Q: Do you see this an an example of anti-democratic social warfare being waged by radical right authoritarian, theocratic warriors with the Republican Party being the authoritarian-theocrat Department of War? If not that, what would you call it?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Abortion war in Texas: The Texas Tribune writes:
Federal court ruling may prevent Texas teens from getting 
birth control without parental permission

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a former religious liberty lawyer, found that a federal program that gives teens access to birth control denies a parent “a fundamental right to control and direct the upbringing of his minor children.”

A federal court ruling Tuesday may make it nearly impossible for Texas teens to access birth control without their parents’ permission.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled that Title X, a federal program that provides free, confidential contraception to anyone, regardless of age, income or immigration status, violates parents’ rights and state and federal law.

Kacsmaryk, appointed by President Donald Trump in 2019, is a former religious liberty lawyer who helped litigate cases seeking to overturn protections for contraception.
This is CN theocracy being forced on people by the federal courts. Attacks on civil liberties like this allow radical right politicians in Texas and congress to escape most accountability. All they have to do is say the court did it, not them. It's a great tactic because it works quite well.

News chunks: Rule of law wars intensify; Tucker causes bipartisan outrage?

The radical right war on democracy and the rule of law is getting really ugly. Several sources are reporting that radical right Republican politicians in Georgia are pursuing oversight of state prosecutors. This is a direct attack on the rule of law. What prompted it is the possibility that Trump will be indicted for crimes he committed in Georgia. The NYT writes:
To Fani T. Willis, the district attorney in Atlanta, several bills in the Georgia legislature that would make it easier to remove local prosecutors are racist and perhaps retaliatory for her ongoing investigation of former President Donald J. Trump.

To the Republican sponsors of the bills, they are simply a way to ensure that prosecutors enforce the laws of the state, whether they agree with them or not.

To Fani T. Willis, the district attorney in Atlanta, several bills in the Georgia legislature that would make it easier to remove local prosecutors are racist and perhaps retaliatory for her ongoing investigation of former President Donald J. Trump.

To the Republican sponsors of the bills, they are simply a way to ensure that prosecutors enforce the laws of the state, whether they agree with them or not. 

Ms. Willis has been a centrist law-and-order prosecutor who has targeted some prominent local rappers in a sprawling gang case. She is also part of the changing face of justice in Georgia: The state now has a record number of minority prosecutors — 14 of them — up from five in 2020, the year Ms. Willis, who is Black, was voted into office.

And of course, there is the Trump inquiry, the latest accelerant to the partisan conflagrations that have consumed the increasingly divided state for years. The subject of Ms. Willis’s investigation is whether Mr. Trump and his allies tried to flout Georgia’s democratic process with numerous instances of interference after his narrow 2020 election loss in the state.


“For the hundreds of years we’ve had prosecutors, this has been unnecessary. 
But now all of a sudden this is a priority. And it is racist.” 
Fani Willis, Atlanta district attorney 

Those supporters include United States Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who tweeted in August that Ms. Willis was using taxpayer funds “for her personal political witch hunt against Pres Trump, but will NOT prosecute crime plaguing Atlanta!”

Lawmakers have fired back. At the hearing last month, State Senator Bill Cowsert, a Republican who is the brother-in-law of Gov. Brian Kemp, said, “For you to come in here and try to make this about racism, that this bill is directed at any district attorney or solicitor because of racism, is absurd, and it’s offensive, and it’s a racist statement on its own.”

Senator Brian Strickland, a Republican who was presiding over the meeting, told Ms. Willis, “You’re being emotional.”

So, who is being racist and emotional here, the radical right, the prosecutor investigating Trump, both or neither, in whole or in part? 

Since it is likely we will never know for sure, it seems reasonable to think the radical right is the one being racist and emotional. The evidence is consistent with that belief in the case of Trump trying to screw and subvert democracy in Georgia after the 2020 election. 

In my opinion, the radical right deserves a default position of distrust because it has worked for decades to build distrust in American society. Now, it just seems fair and balanced for the radicals to reap what they have so diligently sowed for so long. If the radical right wants public trust, it can take the time and effort to try to earn trust on the merits. Maybe in a decade or two, the default distrust position would become untenable. At present, the extremist elites are not inclined to earn public trust on the merits. They are all-in on demagoguing the base and shafting us whenever they can.

____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

From the Wait, what?? Files: The Hill reports on something strange. Faux News’ Tucker Carlson may have actually cause some actual bipartisan outrage. Or maybe it’s just faux outrage from a few Republican fakers. The Hill writes:
Tucker Carlson’s Jan. 6 footage sparks bipartisan outrage

Fox News host Tucker Carlson whipped up a firestorm Tuesday on Capitol Hill, sparking bipartisan backlash and igniting tensions with Capitol Police by downplaying the Jan. 6 Capitol riot on his prime-time program as “mostly peaceful chaos.”

His show divided Republicans, with a number of GOP senators ripping his portrayal of the incursion at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger, who rarely offers opinions on political issues, said the Monday night show was filled with “offensive and misleading conclusions about the Jan. 6 attack.”

“The program conveniently cherry-picked from the calmer moments of our 41,000 hours of video. The commentary fails to provide context about the chaos and violence that happened before or during these less tense moments,” Manger wrote in a memo to lawmakers.  
Carlson at the same time won plaudits from other Republicans who have similarly criticized and downplayed the attack.

“When will judges begin applying justice equally? Doesn’t look like “thousands of armed insurrectionists” to me,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said in a tweet after thanking McCarthy and Carlson for showing the footage. 
“I’ve seen enough. Release all J6 political prisoners now,” Rep. Mike Collins (R-Ga.) said in a tweet as Carlson’s show aired.

Trump also weighed in on the footage, praising Carlson and McCarthy over its publication and calling the tapes the Fox host played for his audience “irrefutable.”

Although Faux promised to allow Capitol police to review the tapes for security purposes before airing anything, the Hill article says that Tucker and Faux just blew that off. That was just empty bullshit from professional liars.


We all knew this was coming
Remember a couple of posts I recently wrote about Carson, the professional liar, doing a whitewash job with the 1/6 security footage? Calling the violent 1/6 coup attempt mostly peaceful chaos is the sort of thing to be expected. Tucker doing mendacious propaganda like this is no surprise. 

What is a surprise is that a few Republicans in congress expressed disapproval in more than a tiny little squeak of displeasure. Most likely, that will blow over in the next few days. Tucker will be free to continue to lie about the 1/6 coup attempt as he whitewashes it. There will be silent complicity from Republicans in congress, if not their open support. This hiccup will be forgotten. Tucker’s poison will flow freely. 

I have said it before and say it again, the radical right is hell bent on rewriting inconvenient history. The violent 1/6 coup attempt will be mythologized into a tempest in a teapot incident. That is what most of the radical right rank and file believes it was anyway. Extremist elites just need to spread the myth to a larger audience. 


Q: In view of everything that has gone before now, is Republican outrage is credible and real, or is it just political theater for propaganda purposes, e.g., to ease the way for the mendacious mythologizing that Tucker is going to do to the 1/6 coup attempt?

Tuesday, March 7, 2023

Biden Admin Considers Reinstating Detention of Migrant Families

There's  no shortage of news here when it comes to Republicans. But we're in the third year of the Biden Administration and little is written about its plans, policies and doings here. The following article reports that the Biden Admin is now considering reinstating detention programs of migrant families, like those Biden criticized as a candidate and eliminated for being "inhumane" in 2021.  This story was reported in the New York Times on 3/6/23.


WASHINGTON — The Biden administration is considering reviving the practice of detaining migrant families who cross the border illegally — the same policy the president shut down over the past two years because he wanted a more humane immigration system, officials familiar with the discussions said Monday.

Although no final decision has been made, the move would be a stark reversal for President Biden, who came into office promising to adopt a more compassionate approach to the border after the harsh policies of his predecessor, former President Donald J. Trump.

The Biden administration has largely ended the practice of family detention, instead releasing families into the United States temporarily and using ankle bracelets, traceable cellphones or other methods to keep track of them.

But the administration has turned to more restrictive measures as it struggles to handle a rise in migrants fleeing authoritarian governments and economic ruin in their countries. Officials also fear a surge at the border after May 11, when a public health measure that has allowed authorities to swiftly expel migrants expires.

Mr. Biden’s tough new measures, including a crackdown announced last month that could disqualify a vast majority of migrants from being able to seek asylum at the southern border, have infuriated advocates who say the president is breaking campaign promises and embracing a Trump-era approach to immigration.

“Ending the inhumane practice of family detention has been one of the only positive immigration policy decisions of the Biden administration,” said Leecia Welch, a lead lawyer in the case that led to the 1997 Flores settlement, which limits the time children can spend in detention and establishes minimum standards for holding facilities.

“It is heartbreaking to hear there could be a return to the Trump-era use of this practice,” she said.

The White House declined to comment, but administration officials reject any comparison to Mr. Trump and say Mr. Biden’s policies are focused on finding ways to decrease the number of illegal crossings and expand migrants’ ability to seek legal pathways.

The Department of Homeland Security said no decisions had been made as the administration prepared for the end of the public health measure, known as Title 42.

“The administration will continue to prioritize safe, orderly and humane processing of migrants,” Luis Miranda, a department spokesman, said in a statement.

But senior White House and homeland security immigration advisers have held several meetings over the past few days to discuss their options, including reinstating the family detention policy, according to five current and former administration officials with knowledge of the discussions.

The officials said the Department of Homeland Security is outlining what it would need to do to restart temporary family detention by May 11.

One of the officials cautioned that the administration would follow the court settlement that sets a 20-day limit for detaining families, rather than holding them for weeks or even months as previous administrations did. Another option would be continuing the practice in place now — releasing families into the country, where they would be tracked and required to report to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office, the official said.

- ________________________________________________

 

In related news, the Biden Administration, last month,  proposed a new rule that would would hold that migrants are not eligible for asylum if they entered the country unlawfully. The proposed rule, put forward by DHS,  can be read here: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/23/2023-03718/circumvention-of-lawful-pathways As the NYT explains:

"It would allow rapid deportation of anyone who had failed to request protection from another country while en route to the United States or who did not notify border authorities through a mobile app of their plans to seek asylum....

President Biden took office vowing to restore a humane approach to the border crisis after his predecessor, former President Donald J. Trump, introduced a series of harsh immigration policies, including the separation of migrant children from their parents. But as the Biden administration has struggled to quell a surge of migrants fleeing economic ruin in their countries, including Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, it has turned to more restrictive measures.

The decision, announced jointly by the Homeland Security and Justice Departments, was sharply rebuked by human rights advocates who said the policy mirrored an earlier, much-criticized restriction under Mr. Trump that denied asylum to most migrants who had not first applied for it in Mexico or another country along their way. That policy had been struck down by several federal courts.

Many migrants do not apply for asylum in Mexico, preferring to try their luck in the United States. The new policy was expected to erect a formidable barrier to those hoping to submit U.S. applications."

See this explainer for further discussion and details:  https://www.govexec.com/management/2023/02/bidens-border-crackdown-explained-refugee-law-expert-looks-legality-and-impact-new-asylum-rule/383350/

 

 

 

 

Op-Ed: Whose nanny state?

 When I was a wee lad, my dad taught me a game of solitaire called Idiot’s delight. Chances of winning were slim — about 1 in 20. But the odds for idiots have changed today.

By Robert Kahn

Deputy editor emeritus, Courthouse News

Republican lawmakers and candidates today love to whang on what they refuse to call the Loyal Opposition. They claim Democrats hunger to set up a “nanny state,” to control our every move.

The technical term for this malicious fantasy is psychological projection: projecting your own undesirable emotions onto an imaginary aggressor, rather than dealing with them honestly.

I went in search of a nanny state, and offer you these new laws and proposals, all within the past year, by Republicans.

Smelling the wind from the governor’s office, the Florida High School Athletic Association wanted to require high school athletes to answer the questions: “When was your most recent menstrual period?” and, “How many periods have you had in the past year?” if they want to play on a high school team.

This insane, intrusive proposal springs from Gov. Ron DeSantis’ signing a law that bans transgender athletes from competing in public schools, from kindergarten through college. It is vomitous on so many levels:

“No menstrual periods from you, hey, Joanna? Lemme see who you really are. Drop ‘em, Johnny.”

“No menstrual periods from you for two months, hey, Joanna? Are you thinking about getting an abortion? Well, we’ve got you on file here, darling.”

Also in Florida, law prohibits abortion after 15 weeks. DeSantis wants to reduce it to 6 weeks — before most women know they’re pregnant.

But let’s not stop at Florida. Idaho is just as bad — except it’s prettier, the climate is better, and the people are nicer and younger, except for the neo-Nazis up in the Panhandle.

In Idaho, state Sen. Tammy Nichols of Middleton and state Rep. Judy Boyle of Midvale introduced a bill that would criminalize doctors who administer mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, such as the Covid vaccines discovered by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech.

“If passed as written, it would also preemptively ban the use of countless other mRNA vaccines that are now in development, such as shots for RSV, a variety of cancers, HIV, flu, Nipah virus, and cystic fibrosis, among others,” according to Ars Technica, a website that, since it studies science and technology, obviously has a nefarious Master Plan: to keep people from dying young.

Why would these allegedly “pro-life” idiot Republicans propose such a law?

“It’s obvious, Dude!” a young skateboarding friend of mine explained. “Young people vote for Democrats! They want young people to die!”

As proof, consider Alaska state Rep. David Eastman (R-Wasilla), who said that, once a child has been sexually abused, it might be better to just let the kid die, as a “benefit to society,” because treatment "could cost the family and broader society $1.5 million in terms of trauma and what the child could potentially have earned over their lifetime.”

Ahh! Those pro-life Republicans.

And how about those Republican storm troopers in North Dakota, whose Senate Bill 2360 would send librarians to jail and fine them $1,500 if they allow “partially denuded human figures” to appear in books on their shelves.

Like the Venus de Milo? (Man, did you see the tits on that Mona Lisa chick? Wuddaya think she’s smiling at?) Obviously inappropriate for just about everyone.

Or Michelangelo’s David. (What was Mike thinking? A groomer, that’s all he was.)

As for DeSantis’s “education” “reforms,” specifically, Florida House Bill 999? Straight out of Vlad (the Impaler) Putin and Xi Jinping. This bill would prohibit schools from teaching, or mentioning, the history of Reconstruction, perhaps the Civil War itself, the Klan, the civil rights conflicts of the 1960s, George Wallace standing in the schoolhouse door shouting, “segregation forever!” I presume it would also prohibit jazz studies.

All this is just a whiff of the fragrant bouquet of bullshit laws today’s Republican Party want to set on our doorsteps and set on fire. Consider the party’s attack on child labor laws. The Iowa bill would also “exempt employers from liability if these young workers are sickened, injured or killed on the job,” according to The Guardian’s U.S. website, which covers the United States way better than most of our homegrown newspapers do, although The New York Times did catch up a bit last week.

Finally, for sheer idiocy, consider Florida’s Senate Bill 932, which would make it illegal for a driver to let a dog stick his head out the window while in motion, punishable by a $5,000 fine, with the possibility of barring “offenders” from owning an animal.

We’ve all heard about the traffic “offense” of driving while Black. This one would criminalize driving while human.

https://www.courthousenews.com/whose-nanny-state/