Etiquette



DP Etiquette

First rule: Don't be a jackass.

Other rules: Do not attack or insult people you disagree with. Engage with facts, logic and beliefs. Out of respect for others, please provide some sources for the facts and truths you rely on if you are asked for that. If emotion is getting out of hand, get it back in hand. To limit dehumanizing people, don't call people or whole groups of people disrespectful names, e.g., stupid, dumb or liar. Insulting people is counterproductive to rational discussion. Insult makes people angry and defensive. All points of view are welcome, right, center, left and elsewhere. Just disagree, but don't be belligerent or reject inconvenient facts, truths or defensible reasoning.

Sunday, February 5, 2023

We have more to fear from stupid people than evil ones

 

Bonhoeffer’s “theory of stupidity”


  • When we know something or someone is evil, we can take steps to fight it. With stupidity, it is much more difficult. 
  • Dietrich Bonhoeffer argues that stupidity is worse than evil because stupidity can be manipulated and used by evil. 
  • He also argues that stupidity tends to go hand-in-hand with acquiring power — that is, being in power means we surrender our individual critical faculties.
      • There’s an internet adage that goes, “Debating an idiot is like trying to play chess with a pigeon — it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.” It’s funny and astute. It’s also deeply, depressingly worrying. Although we’d never say so, we all have people in our lives we think of as a bit dim — not necessarily about everything, but certainly about some things.

        Most of the time, we laugh this off. After all, stupidity can be pretty funny. When my friend asked a group of us recently what Hitler’s last name was, we laughed. When my brother learned only last month that reindeer are real animals — well, that’s funny. Good-natured ribbing about a person’s ignorance is an everyday part of life.
      • Stupidity, though, has its dark side. For theologian and philosopher Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the stupid person is often more dangerous than the evil one.

        The enemy within

        In comic books and action movies, we know who the villain is. They wear dark clothes, kill on a whim, and cackle madly at their diabolical scheme. In life, too, we have obvious villains — the dictators who violate human rights or serial killers and violent criminals. As evil as these people are, they are not the biggest threat, since they are known. Once something is a known evil, the good of the world can rally to defend and fight against it. As Bonhoeffer puts it, “One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion.”

        Stupidity, though, is a different problem altogether. We cannot so easily fight stupidity for two reasons. First, we are collectively much more tolerant of it. Unlike evil, stupidity is not a vice most of us take seriously. We do not lambast others for ignorance. We do not scream down people for not knowing things. Second, the stupid person is a slippery opponent. They will not be beaten by debate or open to reason. What’s more, when the stupid person has their back against the wall — when they’re confronted with facts that cannot be refuted — they snap and lash out. Bonhoeffer puts it like this:

      • “Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here; reasons fall on deaf ears; facts that contradict one’s prejudgment simply need not be believed — in such moments the stupid person even becomes critical — and when facts are irrefutable, they are just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. In all this the stupid person, in contrast to the malicious one, is utterly self-satisfied and, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack.”

      • With great power comes great stupidity

        Stupidity, like evil, is no threat as long as it hasn’t got power. We laugh at things when they are harmless — such as my brother’s ignorance of reindeer. This won’t cause me any pain. Therefore it’s funny.

        The problem with stupidity, though, is that it often goes hand-in-hand with power. Bonhoeffer writes, “Upon closer observation, it becomes apparent that every strong upsurge of power in the public sphere, be it of a political or of a religious nature, infects a large part of humankind with stupidity.”

      • This works in two ways. The first is that stupidity does not disbar you from holding office or authority. History and politics are swimming with examples of when the stupid have risen to the top (and where the smart are excluded or killed). Second, the nature of power requires that people surrender certain faculties necessary for intelligent thought — faculties like independence, critical thinking, and reflection.

      • Bonhoeffer’s argument is that the more someone becomes part of the establishment, the less an individual they become. A charismatic, exciting outsider, bursting with intelligence and sensible policies, becomes imbecilic the moment he takes office. It’s as if, “slogans, catchwords and the like… have taken possession of him. He is under a spell, blinded, misused, and abused in his very being.”

        Power turns people into automatons. Intelligent, critical thinkers now have a script to read. They’ll engage their smiles rather than their brains. When people join a political party, it seems like most choose to follow suit rather than think things through. Power drains the intelligence from a person, leaving them akin to an animated mannequin.

      • Theory of stupidity

        Bonhoeffer’s argument, then, is that stupidity should be viewed as worse than evil. Stupidity has far greater potential to damage our lives. More harm is done by one powerful idiot than a gang of Machiavellian schemers. We know when there’s evil, and we can deny it power. With the corrupt, oppressive, and sadistic, we know where we stand. You know how to take a stand.

        But stupidity is much harder to weed out. That’s why it’s a dangerous weapon: Because evil people find it hard to take power, they need stupid people to do their work. Like sheep in a field, a stupid person can be guided, steered, and manipulated to do any number of things. Evil is a puppet master, and it loves nothing so much as the mindless puppets who enable it — be they in the general public or inside the corridors of power.

        The lesson from Bonhoeffer is to laugh at those daft, silly moments when in close company. But, we should get angry and scared when stupidity takes reign.



Saturday, February 4, 2023

Supreme Court non-ethics; GOP witch hunts; etc.

An analysis of the ethics situation at the Supreme Court (SC) concludes that ethics are optional. The SC excuses itself from existing ethics regulations and says there is nothing to see here. Balls and Strikes writes:
The Supreme Court Spouses Cannot Stop 
Stomping On Ethical Rakes

Supreme Court justices all fill out mandatory financial disclosures, which include income of their family members. Court spokesperson Patricia McCabe came to the defense of Jane Roberts [wife of chief justice Roberts], pointing to a 2009 advisory opinion stating that judges “need not recuse merely because” their spouse works as a recruiter for firms with business before the Court. But Price points out that because Jane Roberts listed her compensation on these forms as salary, instead of spelling out her commissions, her work posed obvious ethical conflicts for the Chief Justice: The Roberts family could be quietly raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars from law firms with regular business before the Court. According to Price, Jane Roberts made millions in commissions. Details about which lawyers she placed where—and the money she made for it—would shed more light about the propriety of the Chief recusing himself from certain cases before the Court.

If Supreme Court justices were bound by the existing code of conduct for federal judges, which requires that spouses divulge the sources of income over $1,000, including commissions, Jane Roberts’s conduct here could have been a violation. But the justices are not formally bound by the code. Previously, John Roberts has asserted that the justices have “no reason” to adopt it for themselves.

But even if Jane Roberts’s work wouldn’t have actually required her husband to recuse, her failure to disclose her income correctly raises questions about why. And right now, the appearance of corruption is just as harmful to a Court that cannot stop itself from stepping on ethical rakes. In his 2021 end-of-the-year report, Chief Justice Roberts noted that the code of conduct requires that “a judge recuse in any matter in which the judge knows of a personal financial interest, no matter how small.” Public confidence in the institution is at an all-time low, and the justices’ unyielding belief that they are above the rules is a major reason why. It would have been so easy for the Robertses to do the right thing here. They simply couldn’t be bothered.
Roberts says there is “no reason” to adopt an ethics conduct code. This is another example of the smug arrogance of the SC. 

Analysis
1. If there is no reason to adopt ethics rules, there is equally no reason not to. Right? Right. That's just common sense. 

2. Roberts knows that public trust in the SC has fallen. He claims that is a bad thing for democracy. He also claims that there is no reason to adopt ethics. Therefore, why not adopt an ethics code that would give the public an actual reason to maybe have some trust? The most likely answer is that there are lots of corrupt and/or partisan political things the SC needs to hide. That's also just common sense.

3. Since Roberts is a Republican in charge of the SC, it is reasonable to believe that his anti-ethics, pro-secrecy, and pro-corruption attitude reflects that of the GOP leadership generally. After all, Republicans in congress and the White House want judges that look and act like them and that carry out the radical right's anti-democracy political agenda. More common sense. 


---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------


The witch hunts begin: The NYT writes on the first subpoenas the radical right GOP House has issued:
Republicans on Friday issued their first subpoenas of the Biden administration since taking control of the House, demanding documents for an investigation into whether the government mistreated parents who were scrutinized after school officials endured threats and harassment over mask mandates and teaching about racism.

Just two days after the Judiciary Committee was organized for the new Congress, Representative Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio and the panel’s chairman, sent subpoenas to Merrick B. Garland, the attorney general, F.B.I. Director Christopher Wray and Miguel A. Cardona, the secretary of education, accusing them of withholding information about whether the government overreached in scrutinizing parents.
It is reasonable to expect that even if the government did not overreach, Republican extremists will find overreach. Then endless impeachments will commence and not end until the GOP gets voted out of power over the House. Obviously there is a big assumption here. That is, assuming it will ever be possible to vote Republicans out of power after they are done rigging elections in their favor. We might find out after the 2024 elections. 


---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------


A commentator commentates on the new and improved House of Representatives:
A CNN poll last week found that about three-quarters of Americans, including nearly half of Republicans, think House Republican leaders aren’t paying enough attention to the country’s most pressing problems.

So this week, GOP leaders set out to rectify the situation. They approved a resolution condemning the Russian Revolution. Of 1917. .... “Congress denounces socialism in all its forms and opposes the implementation of socialist policies in the United States,” the resolution concluded. .... “Socialism is the greatest threat to our economy and freedom and must be defeated,” Rep. Roger Williams (R-Tex.) warned the House on Thursday, calling the fictional menace “alarming and scary.” 
Still awaiting legislative action by the new House majority: a condemnation of Genghis Khan’s Siege of Merv in 1221 and the Roman Sack of Carthage during the Third Punic War.  
This week alone, the new majority used its powers in committee rooms and on the House floor to undermine trust in government on various fronts:
  • Falsely claiming that lazy bureaucrats are refusing to go to work, denying Americans their tax refunds, passports and benefits.
  • Falsely insinuating that the government is forcing Americans to take coronavirus vaccines that are both deadly and useless.
  • Falsely asserting that the Biden administration is in effect killing Americans by encouraging fentanyl smugglers to enter the country across “open borders.”
  • Falsely declaring the only Muslim on the House Foreign Affairs Committee a threat to national security and booting her from the panel in a party-line vote.
  • And, for extra credit, summoning the ghosts of Stalin and Mao to suggest that the administration promotes an ideology of mass murder.
 
Although socialism is a fictional menace, the alarming and scary radical right GOP is an actual menace. 

So there you have it, fans of functioning government. The GOP knows how to rule with grace, wisdom and efficiency.  . . . . . /s 


Let’s take a quick tour of the crazies in the House. Their war on critical thinking explains a lot about why the United States is laughed at on the global stage, and why no real solutions to our problems emerge from that broken legislative body.


The Christian nationalist “Jesus, He gets us” propaganda campaign

CONTEXT
Love the sinner, hate the sin is a standard Christian nationalist (CN) lie. The reality is: Hate the sinner and the sin, but lie about it. 


POST
We now get to experience a new, deeper level of propaganda cynicism and shameless lies from the morally rotted CN fundamentalist theocrats who successfully attacked reproductive rights in the famous 2014 Hobby Lobby Supreme Court case.[1] 

This immoral propaganda campaign shows (1) the heavy reliance of CN on dark free speech, especially lies of omission, and (2) CN fear about an documented increasing abandonment of Christian fundamentalism. CN is an enraged, wounded poison-fanged monster with no moral compass. It is openly fighting for power and wealth.

NPR broadcast this 4:30 minute interview:




Key points:
  • Claiming that Jesus was an immigrant and thus persecuted hides hypocritical CN propaganda vilifying immigrants [and secularism, civil liberties, democracy, women, non-believers (like me! 😘) and the LGBQT community] 
  • CN religious leaders openly attack and vilify liberals and Democrats as evil, but then they turn on a dime and try to coax the evil ones into church attendance 
  • This propaganda campaign is funded by a group The Signatry, which operates in as much secrecy as possible to hide the identity of the donors as much as possible


Commentary: CN and the MSM
NPR comments: 
NPR’s Scott Detrow talks with Religion News Service’s Bob Smietana about the “He Gets Us” campaign, which is spending millions to promote Jesus while its funding and overall goal remain unclear.
Once again, the MSM gets it seriously wrong. The funding and overall goal of this propaganda campaign are obvious: Even more power and wealth for the elites running the toxic, theocratic CN political movement. 

Honestly, WTF is wrong with NPR? NPR can’t possibly be stupid enough to not see what is going on here. NPR has reported on the CN movement before, so ignorance cannot be the excuse. Most likely, money is the excuse.

This exemplifies a key reason a person can reasonably accord the MSM a grade of F. The MSM continues with reporting that is unjustifiable and just plain wrong. If we manage somehow to save our democracy, secularism and civil liberties, it will be despite the MSM’s constant failures, not because of its occasional successes.


Q:  Is it rational and justifiable to feel a surge of serious anger at both NPR and the MSM generally, and the CN political movement in view of this news? Or, is anger irrational and/or unwarranted, e.g., because this is just politics, propaganda and news reporting as usual, and/or because I am an atheist and thus a bit of the unworthy scum in the CN’s crosshairs?


Footnote: 
1. WikipdeiaBurwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014), is a landmark decision in United States corporate law by the United States Supreme Court allowing privately held for-profit corporations to be exempt from a regulation its owners religiously object to, if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest, according to the provisions of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.

And then the CN movement howls about harmless, innocent Christians being constantly persecuted and threatened in secular America. Those howls come despite religion-protecting layers of constitution and law, and overwhelming Christian dominance of all of American society. That’s the effective and always popular CN persecution myth. It works like a toxic charm.