Pragmatic politics focused on the public interest for those uncomfortable with America's two-party system and its way of doing politics. Considering the interface of politics with psychology, cognitive biology, social behavior, morality and history.
Etiquette
Friday, September 6, 2024
About Perplexity
Tim Walz, not masculine enough.
You heard it here first people. Tim Walz is not masculine. How do we know this?
Fox News’ Jesse Watters dismissed Tim Walz’s “masculinity” by pointing to the Minnesota governor drinking milkshakes on the campaign trail Wednesday.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/critics-shake-off-jesse-watters-065230731.html
He continued, “The other day you saw him with a vanilla ice cream shake. Had a straw in it. Again, that tells you everything.”
Walz used a straw for a milkshake. Fox News is absolutely right to attack his masculinity.
Straws, as all the bros banging plates around down at the gym will tell you, are the least-masculine way for a man to drink a vanilla ice cream shake.
Not clear how Tim Walz's masculinity will recover from 'strawgate'
More important, the sharp-eyed Watters absolutely NAILED Walz by noticing that he was consuming his vanilla ice cream shake with – and if you have male children in the room, make sure they don’t hear this – a straw.
Meanwhile, seems Jesse Watters missed this................
Some religious musings…
This is kinda long, so bear with me.
I was looking back through some of the hardcopy correspondence I had many years ago with my Christian stepkids. Here’s an interesting little tidbit I found, and presented them with:

Well, that’s quite the “story.” I don’t know about you, but my head is still spinning. 😵
Questions:
Is that all this chronology is, a “story?” Metaphor woven into something humans can relate to (complete with protagonist, antagonist, hero, foil, etc.)?
Other than my overly dramatic style (which I pride myself in 😉), what did I get wrong there in my writeup? Not nuanced enough? There are missing details that really matter?
What kind of person gives this bizarre scenario a pass; that is to say, willingly accepts it with no questions asked?
Make sense of this God story for me (something I would call the main premise of the Bible), because I’m at a loss. No offense but I’m just calling it like I see it. I’m sayin’ there seems to be only one perverted/mixed up/confused Character in this story (no Names mentioned 🤐).
Bible Title Redux
What would you rename the Bible:
- God… Profile of a Psychopath? Or,
- God… An exercise in the workings of the human psyche? Or,
- God… Other [your reduxed title here]
(by PrimalSoup)
Thursday, September 5, 2024
Bits: Kavanaugh Hearing; DJT explicitly admits losing in 2020; Arrogant oligarchs & their bad science
Elon Musk has used his large platform on X to promote a theory that a free-thinking “Republic” could only exist under the decision-making of “high status males” – and women or “low T men” would not be welcome in it.
On Sunday, Musk re-posted a screenshot of the theory – which appears to have been conceived on 4chan in 2021– on the social media site.
The theory, written by an anonymous user, suggests that the only people able to think freely are “high [testostrone] alpha males” and “aneurotypical people”, and that these “high status males” should run a “Republic” that is “only for those who are free to think.”
“People who can’t defend themselves physically (women and low T men) parse information through a consensus filter as a safety mechanism,” the post reads.
“Only high T alpha males and aneurotypical people (hey autists!) are actually free to parse new information with an objective ‘is this true?’ filter,” it adds. “This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think.”
“Aneurotypical” is not a word but one can assume the original poster meant neurodivergent people.
Billionaires like Elon Musk want to save civilization by having tons of genetically superior kids. Inside the movement to take ‘control of human evolution.’Sitting in their toy-filled family room on a sunny September afternoon, Simone and Malcolm Collins were forced to compete with the wails of two toddlers as they mapped out their plans for humankind.
“I do not think humanity is in a great situation right now. And I think if somebody doesn’t fix the problem, we could be gone,” Malcolm half-shouted as he pushed his sniffling 18-month-old, Torsten, back and forth in a child-size Tonka truck.
Along with his 3-year-old brother, Octavian, and his newborn sister, Titan Invictus, Torsten has unwittingly joined an audacious experiment. According to his parents’ calculations, as long as each of their descendants can commit to having at least eight children for just 11 generations, the Collins bloodline will eventually outnumber the current human population.