A Short Question About Racism

A number of commentators at various sources have commented that the response of the police at the Jan. 6 coup attempt showed far too much deference to the mob, which was almost completely white. They point out that police are not nearly as deferential to protesters when blacks protest and get out of hand. Those people conclude that this is another example of deeply ingrained systemic racism in American society, government and their institutions, especially law enforcement. 

Did what happened on Jan. 6 reflect systemic racism? 

What would be YOUR movie title concerning Jan. 6?

 YOU have to know, that they will make a movie about the events of Jan. 6, 2021.

IT is inevitable.

The only question I ponder, is what title they will give such a movie.

Will it be bland, like:

Jan. 6, 2021, The Storming of the Capital

OR will it be imaginative, like:

Duck Dynasty vs The Capital Police

OR will it be hyper-partisan, like:

Rightwing terrorists invade the Capital

OR will it take a documentary twist, like:

Riot at the Capital: The Real Story 

SO JUST FOR FUN:

IF you, yes YOU, had a say, what title would YOU give such a movie?

Happy Sunday.

The Fraught Way Forward

Is social media greater than insurrection?

The poll data from 538 indicates that the president was still within his normal range, 41.9%. His attempted coup does not yet seem to have cost him much support. Maybe that will appreciably change in coming days. 

Because the president's core supporters are loyal to the man personally, not the president, democracy or the Constitution, it may be the case that banning him from social media will hurt his approval more than his attempted coup. Loss of social media access arguably is the bigger threat to the president's power and influence than his act to overthrow the government by violence. Based on his public reactions so far, the president arguably sees his social media problem as more serious than his insurrection problem, which he doesn't take any responsibility for. 

For example, Trump is considering moving to the radical right authoritarian-fascist social media site Parler or setting up his own social media platform. The president needs to maintain a constant flow of dark free speech to his supporters to keep them trapped in his fake realities and to maintain his power over them. He also needs it to maintain his ability to tap his people for money. 

It is reasonable to think that the president assesses his situation correctly. If so, then the way forward for American politics and society will be fraught. Trump's supporters firmly believe that Trump won, Biden lost, the election was fraudulent and people who say otherwise are liars. There is no indication so far that a significant portion of the GOP leadership is going to take the coup attempt seriously or otherwise act to counteract the fake realities that Trump has created to trap his supporters. Those people have been sucked into the president's vortex of lies and manipulation. 

So, what can people who oppose the president do to try to inject some reality and context into the situation? The minds of trumplanida believers are not going to easily change, assuming they can ever be changed. For the most part, those minds will have to change themselves. At the moment, the best way to do that probably is to keep the demagogue off of social media. Memories fade, including the memories of Trump supporters. 

The unsolvable problem: dark free speech

Of course the problems with that are (1) Fox News, Breitbart, Newsmax, OANN, etc., and (2) Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz and other radical right GOP demagogues itching for power. Those radical right propaganda sources are not going to change their rhetoric and tactics nor will they go away. And, maybe the radical right online presence will migrate to Parler as the central propaganda clearing house for Trump. Supporters could go to Parler as the central source, while maintain their hundreds of millions of accounts on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and whatever else there is for repeating and spreading demagoguery, propaganda and lies.

By now, it is clear that simply stating inconvenient facts and laying out sound reasoning has either a neutral or no effect, or they are counterproductive by reinforcing false beliefs. The trumplandia "reasoning" is that assertions of inconvenient facts or reasoning is evidence they are false and the messenger or source is liar. There is no way to penetrate that kind of mindset with mere truth or logic.

Maybe it is a personal lack of imagination and/or intelligence, but every democratic, civilized path forward seems to be significantly (mostly?) blocked by the unstoppable power of dark free speech. 

So, other than keeping Trump off of social media, which probably won't work, and teaching people critical thinking skills, what other plausible options are there? What am I  missing? The problem always seems to boil down to dark free speech.

Treason in the capitol security plan?

 This is an excellent article in Business Insider:  https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-attempted-coup-federal-law-enforcement-capitol-police-2021-1  It details the reasons why there is good reason to suspect that security officials connived to leave the Capitol unprotected.  The primary sources are foreign-based police officials.  From the article:

The French police official detailed multiple lapses they believe were systematic:

1. Large crowds of protesters needed to be managed far earlier by the police, who instead controlled a scene at the first demonstration Trump addressed, then ignored the crowd as it streamed toward the Capitol.
2. "It should have been surrounded, managed, and directed immediately, and that pressure never released."
3. Because the crowd was not managed and directed, the official said, the protesters were able to congregate unimpeded around the Capitol, where the next major failure took place.
4. "It is unthinkable there was not a strong police cordon on the outskirts of the complex. Fences and barricades are useless without strong police enforcement. This is when you start making arrests, targeting key people that appear violent, anyone who attacks an officer, anyone who breaches the barricade. You have to show that crossing the line will fail and end in arrest."
5. "I cannot believe the failure to establish a proper cordon was a mistake. These are very skilled police officials, but they are federal, and that means they ultimately report to the president. This needs to be investigated."
6. "When the crowd reached the steps of the building, the situation was over. The police are there to protect the building from terrorist attacks and crime, not a battalion of infantry. That had to be managed from hundreds of meters away unless the police were willing to completely open fire, and I can respect why they were not."

The French police official said they believed that an investigation would find that someone interfered with the deployment of additional federal law-enforcement officials on the perimeter of the Capitol complex.

It is routine for the Capitol Police to coordinate with the federal Secret Service and the Park Police and local police in Washington, DC, before large demonstrations. The National Guard, commanded by the Department of Defense, is often on standby too.

On Wednesday, however, that coordination was late or absent.

"You cannot tell me I don't know what they should have done. I can fly to Washington tomorrow and do that job, just as any police official in Washington can fly to Paris and do mine," the official said. The official directs public security in a central Paris police district filled with government buildings and tourist sites.

"These are not subtle principles" for managing demonstrations, "and they transfer to every situation," the official said. "This is why we train alongside the US federal law enforcement to handle these very matters, and it's obvious that large parts of any successful plan were just ignored."

The National Guard, which was deployed heavily to quell the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, did not show up to assist the police until two hours after the action started on Wednesday, according to The Associated Press.

Kim Dine, who was the chief of the Capitol Police from 2012 to 2016, told The Washington Post that he was surprised that the Capitol Police allowed demonstrators on the steps of the Capitol. He said he was also mystified that few rioters were arrested on the spot.

Larry Schaefer, who worked for the Capitol Police for more than 30 years, told ProPublica something similar: "We have a planned, known demonstration that has a propensity for violence in the past and threats to carry weapons — why would you not prepare yourself as we have done in the past?"

 

So -- "nice country you have there ..."

 

 

What to Do About Trump Fatigue Syndrome

 Personal note: Snowflake is posting this because he is deeply concerned about the mental health of all those who suffer from TFS.

Most diseases have cures. We should begin our diagnosis with the realization that we no longer inhabit a Republic of political debate but a squalid banality of neo-reality television. This fever of constant outrage will have to be purged or it may kill us all.

by  John Rennie Short

https://hipporeads.com/what-to-do-about-trump-fatigue-syndrome/

I have just been diagnosed with an illness, TFS. It is injurious to long-term health and perhaps too early to say whether it is fatal.

TFS stand for Trump Fatigue Syndrome. It is caused by overexposure to President Donald Trump. Its symptoms include a depressing sense of watching the same drama over and over again. And just like being stuck in a movie theater watching a badly scripted and poorly produced B movie, it begins with feelings of exhaustion then panic with the realization that it may never end.

All diseases have vectors; the carriers of this disease are the mass media of both left and right political persuasion. They cover Trump endlessly became it generates more viewers and listeners. The presentations are suitably tailored to appeal to their respective audiences. Trump the hero of the forgotten Americans on Fox News. Trump the political incompetent on CNN. Trump generates money for the networks whatever their position. He makes news and attracts viewers through constant controversies. The President provides all the tweets, images, talking points, and general mayhem: all the media has to do is to roll the camera and queue the talking head panels. For the mass media Trump is the equivalent of easy money; for the audience the equivalent of empty sugar calories that produce a buzz but not much substance. In the Age of Trump Fascination there’s no need to send reporters on overseas missions, or do deep reporting about what ails the Republic and its peoples. The cheap and easy coverage of Trump allows us to imagine that we are engaged in political debate or critical analysis while in reality we are just party to a flim flam show masquerading as the US presidency.

All diseases have symptoms. For those on the left there is a rising sense of exasperation about what the President does and says. Outrage is continually aroused leading to exhaustion. For those more to the right there is a feeling of resentment against the antipathy to their President. Again, outrage is continually aroused leading to exhaustion.

Some Minds Slowly Awaken Before Going Back To Sleep

Capitalist 'morals': At a gathering of a business advisory group in 2019, 

Tim Cook of Apple told Mr. Trump that it was “an honor” to serve

Someone allegedly said that when a person's paycheck depends on them not understanding something, e.g., denying an obvious reality or fact, it is hard to get them to understand it. That applies to CEOs, who are usually intelligent, highly educated and reasonably politically informed. The New York Times writes:

Many in corporate America endorsed the president’s economic policies, which were good for them and gave him mainstream business credibility. It was “fool’s gold,” one said on Thursday.

Big business struck a Faustian bargain with President Trump.

When he said something incendiary or flirted with authoritarianism, high-minded chief executives would issue vague, moralizing statements and try to distance themselves from a pro-business president who coveted their approval.

But when Mr. Trump cut taxes, rolled back onerous regulations or used them as props for a photo op, they would applaud his leadership and grin for the cameras.

After Wednesday’s events on Capitol Hill, the true cost of that balancing act was plain to see, even through the tear gas wafting in the rotunda.

The executives who stood by Mr. Trump were ultimately among his enablers, bestowing him with the imprimatur of mainstream business credibility and normalizing a president who has turned the country against itself.

“This is what happens when we subordinate our moral principles for what we perceive to be business interests,” said Darren Walker, the president of the Ford Foundation and a board member at Square and Ralph Lauren. “It is ultimately bad for business and bad for society.”  

“I joined because the president asked me to join, and I thought it was the right thing to do as the C.E.O. of a company like Merck,” Ken Frazier, one of the most prominent Black executives in the country, who was the first to quit the councils, said shortly after leaving. “I just felt that as a matter of my own personal conscience, I could not remain.”

But money has a short memory, and it wasn’t long after Charlottesville that Mr. Trump was back in the good graces of corporate America. Just months later, the Trump administration passed a tax overhaul that delivered a windfall to corporations and wealthy individuals.
By lowering corporate taxes, Mr. Trump delivered the business community one of its most coveted prizes, and business leaders lined up to support the effort.  

By 2019, it was as if Charlottesville had never happened at all, and a new business advisory group was formed, this one with the likes of Tim Cook, the chief executive of Apple; Doug McMillon, the chief executive of Walmart; and Julie Sweet, the chief executive of Accenture.  (emphasis added)

What? Moral principles?? Bad for society?? None of has been a problem before, so why it is now? What is different? Is that that the social harm is now so sever and blatant that even CEOs raking in millions from Trump brand politics can no longer deny what has been blatantly obvious for years?

Apparently, what triggered this current spasm of social conscience among some (a few?) powerful business elites is the attempted coup of yesterday. But minds, like money, have short memories. The next radical right GOP candidate who makes a run at demagogue-tyrant will entrance the CEOs with promises of lower taxes and fewer regulations. That will make the social conscience fade back into near non-existence where it usually resides when things are just business as usual.

This brief flash of social conscience is more evidence of why government needs to defend the public interest. The business community can't do it. The stack of cash standing in the way of reality and morality is just too damn big. 

In other words, it's hard to impossible to have a social conscience when your massive paycheck depends on not having one.