Zionism

“

When we were led into the gas chamber, YOU said nothing.

When we were forcibly converted, YOU said nothing.

When we were thrown out of a country

just for being Jews, YOU said nothing.

When we now defend ourselves

all of a sudden, YOU have something to say.

How did we take our revenge

on the Germans for their Final Solution?

How did we take revenge

on the Spanish for their Inquisition?

How did we take revenge

on Islam for being Dhimmis?

How did we take revenge

on the lies of the Protocols of Zion?

We studied our Torah

We innovated in medicine

We innovated in defense systems

We innovated in technology

We innovated in agriculture

We made music

We wrote poetry

We made the desert bloom

We won Nobel prizes

We founded the movie industry

We financed democracy

We fulfilled the word of Hashem by becoming a light unto the Nations of the Earth.

So World, when you criticize us for defending our heritage and our ancestral homeland, we the Jews of the world do exactly what you did, we ignore you.

You have proven to us for the last 2,000 years that when the chips are down, you don’t care.

Now leave us alone and go sort out your own backyard whilst we continue our 5784-year-old mission, enhancing the world we share.”

- Howard Klineberg

News chunk 'n bits: Christian nationalist theology, popularity & propaganda

NPR reports about the Alabama Supreme court judge who apparently adheres to an extreme Christian theology called the Seven Mountains Mandate. Seven Mountains used to be considered extremist but has become more common in the theocratic Christian nationalist wealth and power movement. NPR writes: 

Tom Parker, a Republican who joined the court in 2005, wrote a concurring opinion that quoted at length from sources such as the Book of Genesis, the Ten Commandments and Christian thinkers of centuries ago, such as Thomas Aquinas. But comments he has made in other media have raised questions about his seeming espousal of “Seven Mountains” theology, a concept that some experts consider to be Christian extremism.

“God created government. And the fact that we have let it go into the possession of others, it's heartbreaking for those of us who understand. And we know it is for Him,” Parker said on a recent podcast hosted by Christian activist Johnny Enlow. “And that's why He is calling and equipping people to step back into these mountains right now.”

Parker’s remarks on the podcast were released the same day that the Alabama Supreme Court issued its ruling on IVF embryos. His appearance on the show was first reported by Media Matters for America, a liberal media watchdog organization.

The Seven Mountains Mandate urges adherents to establish what they consider to be God’s kingdom on Earth by taking control of seven areas of society: family, religion, government, education, arts and entertainment, commerce and media. Once relegated to a fringe of the Christian conservative movement, it has gained followers in recent years as the ranks of nondenominational, neo-charismatic Christians have grown in the U.S. It also has earned greater media attention since House Speaker Mike Johnson assumed his elevated role, due to his connections with leaders in the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) movement that espouses Seven Mountain theology.

“The Seven Mountains is a structured outline for Christian supremacy,” said Matthew Taylor, senior scholar at the Institute for Islamic, Christian and Jewish Studies in Baltimore. “The idea is that Christians are supposed to take power over society and that influence flows down from the top of each mountain.” 

“It is a real Christian Nationalist threat to our judicial system to have Supreme Court justices who understand theologically and think of themselves theologically as above precedent and the rule of law,” said Taylor. “If they think that their allegiance is to a higher power and their allegiance is to the Bible primarily before the Constitution, if they are invoking modern prophecies as the rationale for the work that they do, that should really raise questions about the separation of religion and state and the ways that Christianity and Christian nationalism is getting infused into the very structures of how our legal system is working.”

It is hard to know how many churches and congregations this movement consists of. Wikipedia suggests that many in the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) movement are reluctant to admit to being part of Seven Mountains theology (also known as Dominionism). That theology grew mostly out of Pentecostal and Charismatic movements. Data from Pew Research in 2011 suggests the NAR could constitute a significant minority of Christians in the Americas. 

I did not think it would ever be important to know more about Christian theology, especially fringe extremism. Talk about a false sense of security. Well, Christian nationalist elites did a fine job of scaring the bejesus out of me -- false sense of security is all gone.

________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________

Religion News Service recently reported on support for Christian nationalism among Americans:

A new survey finds that fewer than a third of Americans, or 29%, qualify as Christian nationalists, and of those, two-thirds define themselves as white evangelicals.

The survey of 6,212 Americans by the Public Religion Research Institute and the Brookings Institution is the largest yet to gauge the size and scope of Christian nationalist beliefs.

It finds that 10% of Americans are avowed Christian nationalists, what the survey calls “adherents,” while an additional 19% are sympathetic to Christian nationalist ideals.  

The vast majority of Americans (70%) do not think the government should declare America a Christian nation. And nearly 60% do not think its laws should be based on Christian values.

Most Americans (73%) said they preferred a country made up of a diversity of faiths and not just Christianity.  

More than half of Republicans now identify as Christian nationalist or sympathizers, the survey concludes. Some members of Congress, notably Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, proudly endorse the label. Former President Donald Trump called himself a nationalist, and the survey finds Christian nationalists have far more favorable views of Trump than the general population.

That makes the political power of Christian nationalists far greater than their actual numbers in the population.

________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________

Christian nationalist propaganda and slanders by faux Christian Franklin Graham: 

Graham cited Faux News. That alone undermines the credibility of what Graham and his crackpot reasoning asserts. The data is probably not real, because what Faux cited came from something the ultra-radical, Christian nationalist Family Research Council posted online. If the asserted increase in attacks on churches is real, one has to wonder how many of those attacks are by enraged Christian nationalists on churches that support the LGBQT community, immigrants and women's rights. Those attacks probably would not be attributed to radical faux Christians attacking normal, real Christians. Here is what MB | FC says about the FRC:

FRC is designated to be a hate group!

In addition to blatant lying and crackpot reasoning, DJT and radical right authoritarians perfected the dark free speech arts of falsely claiming victimhood and projecting onto critics and opponents what one does ones-self. It appears that all of those propaganda and slander tactics are being adopted by the Christian nationalist movement. The constant appeal of dark free speech to authoritarians, grifters, kleptocrats, ideological zealots and radical extremists comes from its dark power. It has great power to poison minds with lies, hate, slanders and a sense of infallible, arrogant self-righteousness. 

Book review & commentary: White Rural Rage

An interesting NYT opinion by Paul Krugman ponders the information and analysis from the 2024 book, White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy, by Tom Schaller (political science professor) and Paul Waldman (op-ed columnist). The book argues that rural white rage poses an existential threat to American democracy because those voters are increasingly inclined to embrace extremist ideologies, racist beliefs, conspiracy theories, and anti-democratic belief and behavior. Krugman writes (opinion not behind paywall): 

This process [creative destruction in rural areas] and its effects are laid out in devastating, terrifying and baffling detail in “White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy,” a new book by Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman. I say “devastating” because the hardship of rural Americans is real, “terrifying” because the political backlash to this hardship poses a clear and present danger to our democracy and “baffling” because at some level I still don’t get the politics.

Technology is the main driver of rural decline, Schaller and Waldman argue. Indeed, American farms produce more than five times as much as they did 75 years ago, but the agricultural work force declined by about two-thirds over the same period, thanks to machinery, improved seeds, fertilizers and pesticides. Coal production has been falling recently, but thanks partly to technologies like mountaintop removal, coal mining as a way of life largely disappeared long ago, with the number of miners falling 80 percent even as production roughly doubled.

The decline of small-town manufacturing is a more complicated story, and imports play a role, but it’s also mainly about technological change that favors metropolitan areas with large numbers of highly educated workers.

Technology, then, has made America as a whole richer, but it has reduced economic opportunities in rural areas. So why don’t rural workers go where the jobs are? Some have. But some cities have become unaffordable, in part because of restrictive zoning — one thing blue states get wrong — and many workers are reluctant to leave their families and communities.

So shouldn’t we aid these communities? We do. Federal programs — Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and more — are available to all Americans but are disproportionately financed from taxes paid by affluent urban areas. As a result, there are huge de facto transfers of money from rich, urban states like New Jersey to poor, relatively rural states like West Virginia. 

While these transfers somewhat mitigate the hardship facing rural America, they don’t restore the sense of dignity that has been lost along with rural jobs. And maybe that loss of dignity explains both white rural rage and why that rage is so misdirected — why it’s pretty clear that this November a majority of rural white Americans will again vote against Joe Biden, who as president has been trying to bring jobs to their communities, and for Donald Trump, a huckster from Queens who offers little other than validation for their resentment.

This feeling of a loss of dignity may be worsened because some rural Americans have long seen themselves as more industrious, more patriotic and maybe even morally superior to the denizens of big cities — an attitude still expressed in cultural artifacts like Jason Aldean’s hit song “Try That in a Small Town.”

In the crudest sense, rural and small-town America is supposed to be filled with hard-working people who adhere to traditional values, not like those degenerate urbanites on welfare, but the economic and social reality doesn’t match this self-image.

Prime-working-age men outside metropolitan areas are substantially less likely than their metropolitan counterparts to be employed — not because they’re lazy but because the jobs just aren’t there. (The gap is much smaller for women, perhaps because the jobs supported by federal aid tend to be female-coded, such as those in health care.)  

Quite a few rural states also have high rates of homicide, suicide and births to single mothers — again, not because rural Americans are bad people but because social disorder is, as the sociologist William Julius Wilson argued long ago about urban problems, what happens when work disappears.  

Draw attention to some of these realities, and you’ll be accused of being a snooty urban elitist. I’m sure responses to this column will be … interesting.

The result — which at some level I still find hard to understand — is that many white rural voters support politicians who tell them lies they want to hear. It helps explain why the MAGA narrative casts relatively safe cities like New York as crime-ridden hellscapes and rural America as the victim not of technology but of illegal immigrants, wokeness and the deep state.

At this point you’re probably expecting a solution to this ugly political situation. Schaller and Waldman do offer some suggestions. But the truth is that while white rural rage is arguably the single greatest threat facing American democracy, I have no good ideas about how to fight it.

If that analysis is mostly accurate, it accords with other research that indicates that rural dissatisfaction and a sense of threat from minorities and non-heterosexuals, and urban disrespect were significant factors in support for DJT in 2016 and 2020. 

 

One commenter commented: 

All those gadgets, devices, things that we have, large and small, in vast numbers, more than ever [....] still have to be manufactured! And they are ……. in factories offshored by big business in ever country in Asia, and across the border in Mexico. And aided and abetted by the US Government. Wonder where the jobs are? The jobs are there, the tradesmen, the supervisor, the manager, the services………..all there for example, on the eastern seaboard of Thailand - the Detroit of Asia. Cheaper, lower labor and environmental standards, protective barriers, low taxes…. That’s globalism. And that is the decline hollowing out of America and Japan too.

Krugman responded:

I actually did acknowledge the role of imports. But I’ve actually done the math: even if we completely eliminated our trade deficits, manufacturing would still be a much smaller employer than it used to be, and agriculture wouldn’t gain at all. We can’t recreate the economy of the 1960s, no matter how hard we try.

Another commenter commented (incoherently, IMO): 

If you need to grow up in poverty and ignorance to see the problem, then maybe I can help. The democratic party assures these people and other people that they will ameliorate their plight. Their pitch is that it could get a whole lot worse but they are here to take care of you. Trump tells them it could get a whole lot better. He's right it can be a whole lot better and it is time to for the democratic party to say the same. People want to thrive and not just survive. Communities can and should be nurturing. [what does nurturing mean, insulting and slandering urban people, while voting for DJT?]

Krugman responded:

But the reality is that Biden is making a serious effort to revitalize rural communities with his industrial policies, but gets no credit, while Trump did nothing for them and will get something like 80 percent of their votes.

Christian nationalism closes in on tolerance, secularism and democracy

The New York Post writes:

OK lawmaker calls LGBTQ people ‘filth’ following 

beating death of bullied nonbinary teen

An Oklahoma state Senator is facing criticism after he reportedly referred to LGBTQ people as “filth” following the unexpected death of a 16-year-old nonbinary student a day after being beaten up at school.

“I represent a constituency that doesn’t want that filth in Oklahoma,” Sen. Tom Woods, R-Westville, can be heard saying during a legislative forum when asked about the death of nonbinary teen Nex Benedict and legislation allegedly targeting the LGBTQ+ community, according to audio recorded by the Tahlequah Daily Press.

Oklahoma hater Tom Woods

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

Joe.My.God. writes:

Megachurch Pastor: Attending Same-Sex Weddings Is 

“Celebrating Stepping Into Fury Of God’s Judgement”

“The most loving thing you could possibly do would be not to go, and to condemn the relationship; that is loving. It’s not loving to help somebody celebrate stepping into the fury of God’s judgment.  

“It is a blasphemy against God, as is transgender life and homosexuality, as well. That is the message to give in love.” – John MacArthur, when asked about the pastor fired last month from his American Family Association radio show for saying that Christians should feel free to attend same-sex weddings.

There you have it, rationality fans, properly aimed hate is an expression of love in the rage- and hate-driven minds of elite Christian nationalists.

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

A psychology research article suggests that empathy can be gained or lost depending on what people are experiencing: “Observational learning processes influence the extent to which a person empathizes with the pain of another individual. In our study, female participants observed empathic or non-empathic reactions of others and later provided empathy ratings themselves. Observing empathic reactions of others resulted in an increase, whereas observing non-empathic reaction resulted in a decrease of participants’ homegrown empathy. These changes can be explained by observational reinforcement learning and are reflected by the neural processing of empathy in the anterior insula and its functional connectivity to the temporoparietal junction. Our findings show that empathy can be socially transmitted and observational learning can explain the plasticity of empathic reactions in different social environments.”

Assuming that data can be replicated and confirmed, one can envision what people are learning from hateful, bigoted, callous Christian nationalism.

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

NBC News reports about what could be the signals children pick up from Christian nationalism and how they plausibly act in accord with those signals of hate and intolerance:

OWASSO, Okla. — At least 40 students at Owasso High School walked out Monday to protest what they describe as a pervasive culture of bullying with little accountability, which they believe led to a student’s death at their school.

Nex Benedict, 16, died Feb. 8, a day after a fight in a bathroom on the school’s West Campus. In body camera footage from a police officer’s interview with Nex, he described how three students “jumped” him after he threw water on them because they were bullying him and his friend over the way that they dressed. 

Nex’s mother, Sue Benedict, previously told The Independent that Nex told her he faced bullying due to his gender identity. Friends said Nex was transgender and primarily went by he/him pronouns at school but also used they/them pronouns, which Nex's family also used. Several other friends said Nex preferred he/him pronouns. In the body camera footage, when the police officer asked Nex if he ever reported the bullying to the school, Nex said, “I didn’t really see the point in it.”

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

From the Self-Righteous Haters Files: 

Speaking on behalf of Trump outside the U.S. Capitol, self-proclaimed “prophetess” Kat Kerr announces that she is currently surrounded by a million angels who are preparing to “waste this place.” pic.twitter.com/gpyjXYhmVR

— Right Wing Watch (@RightWingWatch) February 26, 2024

Kat, surprisingly not institutionalized for mental disease, allegedly made these remarks about the satanic evil that pervades Washington DC and democrats:

People who stole the election will “hang on meat hooks in hell right next to Hitler. .... 150-foot angels” will kill her critics.

Why not? God talked about him all the time. No matter what you think about him, he picked him, he anointed him, and he appointed him. You know what he says about him? He’s an all-American boy who’s all for America.

So yes, there are powerful plans that are going to happen. Yes, I am his prophet. Yes, I am his revelator. I revelate heaven all over this world and will continue to do so.

They’re [God’s avenging angels?] about to waste this place. Waste every evil being, every demon, every evil principality, every power.” – Self-proclaimed prophet Kat Kerr, holding the staff she uses to ward off hurricanes.

They’re about to waste this place. Waste every evil being, every demon, every evil principality, every power.” – Self-proclaimed prophet Kat Kerr, holding the staff she uses to ward off hurricanes.

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

This kind of deranged Christian nationalist hate is not new. Berkeley News reported in Sept. 2022: 

When the Conservative Political Action Conference convened in Texas last month, state Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick took the stage and surveyed the culture war issues that define today’s Republican agenda: hostility to immigration and transgender rights, and deep commitment to gun rights as a defense against government tyranny.

But in folksy, pastoral tones, he cast these intense issues as subordinate to a higher mission. America’s heritage as a Christian nation is in jeopardy, he warned, and as proof, he cited a recent Gallup Poll that found 67% of liberals believe in God, compared to 95% of conservatives.

In this crucible, “we have to be ready for battle,” Patrick admonished the audience. “We have to be ready for the fight because we are not in a fight any longer of Republicans and Democrats of the old days. We’re in a fight of lightness and darkness. We’re in a fight of powers and principalities. ”

For those fluent in the language of conservative evangelical Christians, Patrick’s message was unmistakable: The midterm elections this fall and the presidential election in 2024 comprise a battle pitting God against Satan — with liberals doing the work of Satan.  

Until recently, such apocalyptic appeals would have been seen as extreme and confined to the political fringe. But in a series of interviews, UC Berkeley scholars described the increasing power of hard-right American Christians, almost all of them white, who have been radicalized by 50 years of social change and demographic change — and by the dramatic decline of their own churches.

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

Politico reports, incorrectly calling authoritarian Christian nationalist elites conservative:

Trump allies prepare to infuse ‘Christian nationalism’ 

in second administration

Spearheading the effort is Russell Vought, president of The Center for Renewing America, part of a conservative consortium preparing for Trump’s return to power

Spearheading the effort is Russell Vought, who served as Trump’s director of the Office of Management and Budget during his first term and has remained close to him. Vought, who is frequently cited as a potential chief of staff in a second Trump White House, is president of The Center for Renewing America think tank, a leading group in a conservative consortium preparing for a second Trump term.

Christian nationalists in America believe that the country was founded as a Christian nation and that Christian values should be prioritized throughout government and public life. As the country has become less religious and more diverse, Vought has embraced the idea that Christians are under assault and has spoken of policies he might pursue in response.

One document drafted by CRA staff and fellows includes a list of top priorities for CRA in a second Trump term. “Christian nationalism” is one of the bullet points. Others include invoking the Insurrection Act on Day One to quash protests and refusing to spend authorized congressional funds on unwanted projects, a practice banned by lawmakers in the Nixon era.

The Christian nationalist Taliban is not going to let any stinking human law stand in the way of God’s infallible Sharia Law with all the “love” (known as hate to normal people) it is anxious to unleash on the evil ones.

Western involvement in the Ukraine war

The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft analyzes US and Western foreign policy. The mission statement of the QIRS says it promotes a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy and critique ideologies that have led to counterproductive outcomes, e.g., the Ukraine war. It advocates for responsible statecraft, which serves the public interest, engages the world through peaceful cooperation, builds a peaceful world, abhors war, and is pro-democracy. A Dec. 4, 2023 QIRS article, Did the West deliberately prolong the Ukraine war?, makes a very troubling argument:

Mounting evidence proves that we cannot believe anything our officials say about the futility of negotiations

It’s becoming increasingly difficult to deny the war in Ukraine could have been ended mere months into the Russian invasion — and that the U.S. and U.K. governments worked to prevent this from happening.

The latest piece of corroboration comes courtesy David Arakhamia, the parliamentary leader of Zelensky’s “Servant of the People” party who led the Ukrainian delegation in peace talks with Moscow. Arakhamia told journalist Natalia Moseichuk in a recent televised interview that “Russia's goal was to push us to take neutrality,” meaning to commit to not joining NATO, and that “they were ready to end the war if we accept neutrality.”

There were several reasons the negotiations ultimately collapsed, he said, including the need to change the Ukrainian constitution (which had been amended in February 2019 to enshrine the country’s NATO aspirations), and the fact that Johnson had come to Kyiv to inform Ukrainian officials the West wouldn’t sign any agreement with Moscow, instead urging: “let’s just fight.”

Arakhamia also said that Kyiv’s lack of trust in the Russian side to fulfill its end of the bargain meant that the peace deal “could only be done if there were security guarantees” — suggesting, obliquely, that negotiations could have borne fruit had they received the backing and involvement of NATO states. Western governments’ provision of security guarantees for Ukraine have long been part of the discussion for how to ensure the sustainability of a post-war peace deal, and in fact, Arakhmia himself disclosed in the same interview that “the Western allies advised us not to agree to ephemeral security guarantees.”  

The interview corroborates claims first reported in May 2022 by the broadly Western-alignedUkrainska Pravda outlet — which reported that Boris Johnson told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky the West wouldn’t support any peace deal regardless of what Ukraine wanted, and they preferred to keep taking the fight to Russian President Vladimir Putin, who was less powerful than they had thought.  

Former U.S. national security official Fiona Hill reported the two sides had reached a tentative peace deal the same month of Johnson’s surprise visit to Kyiv, while former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, and several Turkish officials — all of whom were involved at various times in the talks — have said that NATO officials stopped or undermined negotiations.  

Finally, the effort to prevent peace talks from bearing fruit put not just more Ukrainians in danger, but the entire world. After assuring the U.S. public in February that they needn’t fear nuclear war with Russia, by September, President Joe Biden was privately warning that the world was the closest it had been to “Armageddon” in sixty years. The nineteen months that followed the failure of Russian-Ukrainian peace talks saw several near-misses that could have turned the war into one between Russia and NATO, one that would likely escalate to a nuclear confrontation.

The decision not to seriously pursue a viable diplomatic solution to the war in Ukraine has been a disaster for that country and its inhabitants. The only mild consolation is that it could offer a vital lesson for the United States and other NATO states to apply to and prevent future conflicts — if we dare learn it, that is.

This line of reasoning and supporting evidence is solid evidence that the US and NATO could have had a peace deal early in the war, but decided to prolong the war to weaken Putin and Russia. History and analysis of the war has been discussed here before (here, here and here), but this article reinforces concerns that the situation in the Ukraine is probably untenable for the US, NATO and the Ukraine.

This is information the American people should be aware of. Repeated exposure to it helps keep it in memory (something I definitely need). The US is on the verge of abandoning the Ukraine to Putin’s mercies. As we all know, Putin has no mercy. If Ukrainian defenses collapse, there will be vengeance including genocide and ethnic cleansing. The Ukraine could be annexed into Russia and disappear. That catastrophic failure probably could have been prevented if the US had a more competent foreign policy and a more competent, less pro-war president. 

The wheels of justice turn slowly....

 But it does turn.  OR so I've heard. Eventually, you are gonna be found and arrested. 

But that still raises the question: Why is it taking THIS long? 

Just the last few weeks we have had:

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/f-you-this-is-my-house-accused-jan-6-rioter-wife-accused-of-confronting-cops-at-capitol-arrested-feds-say/

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/accused-jan-6-rioter-wore-jacket-with-his-own-company-logo-and-phone-number-at-capitol-feds/

https://lawandcrime.com/crime/wooh-we-in-this-motherf-father-who-came-to-capitol-on-jan-6-with-wife-14-year-old-son-found-guilty/

All I can think of is thank goodness that https://lawandcrime.com/ is keeping up with these arrests.

But what also concerns me, why aren't these stories plastered all over the pages of the MSM? It's an election year. People are starting to forget about Jan. 6, 2021. 

REMIND THEM!