5 Major Downsides of Writing and Publishing Political Opinion Pieces Online

 Writing political opinion pieces and publishing them online can be a worthwhile and enjoyable pursuit. It can also potentially generate financial rewards, depending on where the articles are published.

There can also be definite downsides to writing politics, though. This is especially true in countries like the United States, where the political divisions run deep and it can be easy to trigger anger and outrage, regardless of the tone and quality of the article.

Here are five negatives:

1. Articles can go out of date quickly 
2. Trolls and obnoxious comments
3. Politics can be a turn-off for some
4. Abrasive writers do best
5. Commenters who don't read the article

https://soapboxie.com/us-politics/Downsides-of-Writing-and-Publishing-Political-Opinion-Pieces

1. Except when they are about Fauci, Hunter Biden, and stolen elections.

2. Except when they get banned and are denied their constitutional right to "free speech". 

3. How can one be turned off on politics in the world of Trumpism? The entertainment value alone is worth the trip.

4. Hmmm, maybe I should be MORE abrasive so my threads do better??

5. BINGO. This one is VERY common, because (as the above article points out):

Some commenters can be triggered purely by the title of an article. 

A memory lane acid trip: What Christian nationalism wants for America

Lest we forget

The Christian nationalist (CN) power and wealth movement wants America to be an aggressively bigoted Christian fundamentalist theocracy. It is fascist American politics wrapped in Christianity. CN dogma demands that America suffers under bigoted Christian Sharia law. It will be run by aggressive, bigoted, wealthy, White, heterosexual men. A 2017 article in The Nation lays this out. The CN agenda is aggressively theocratic and explicit:

Leaked Draft of Trump’s Religious Freedom Order Reveals 

Sweeping Plans to Legalize Discrimination

If signed, the order would create wholesale exemptions for people and organizations who claim religious objections to same-sex marriage, premarital sex, abortion, and trans identity.

A leaked copy of a draft executive order titled “Establishing a Government-Wide Initiative to Respect Religious Freedom,” obtained by The Investigative Fund and The Nation, reveals sweeping plans by the Trump administration to legalize discrimination.

The four-page draft order, a copy of which is currently circulating among federal staff and advocacy organizations, construes religious organizations so broadly that it covers “any organization, including closely held for-profit corporations,” and protects “religious freedom” in every walk of life: “when providing social services, education, or healthcare; earning a living, seeking a job, or employing others; receiving government grants or contracts; or otherwise participating in the marketplace, the public square, or interfacing with Federal, State or local governments.”

The draft order seeks to create wholesale exemptions for people and organizations who claim religious or moral objections to same-sex marriage, premarital sex, abortion, and trans identity, and it seeks to curtail women’s access to contraception and abortion through the Affordable Care Act.

It is reasonable to believe that Christian nationalist elites wrote this EO. The fornicating philistine Trump could not care less about stuff like this, except as a means to get and stay in power. 

This powerful theocratic movement has moved past Trump. It is not going to go away. CN, along with brass knuckles capitalism, is one of the two dogmas that now control the Republican Party. They drive the GOP's bigoted, anti-democracy, anti-regulation, pro-Christian theocracy, and pro-pollution rhetoric and policies.

Fortunately, Trump never signed this death threat to democracy and secularism. But it does show exactly what the CN movement wants. 

Parts of the EO are shown below. The full EO is at the link to the article.

Executive Order—Establishing a Government-Wide Initiative to Respect Religious Freedom

EXECUTIVE ORDER

Establishing a Government-Wide Initiative to Respect Religious Freedom

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, in order to guide the executive branch in formulating and implementing policies with implications for the religious freedom of persons and organizations in America, and to further compliance with the Constitution, applicable statutes, and other legal authorities, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Policy. The United States Constitution enshrines and protects the fundamental natural right to religious liberty. This Constitutional protection ensures that Americans and their religious organizations will not be coerced by the Federal Government into participating in activities that violate their consciences, and will remain free to express their viewpoints without suffering adverse treatment from the Federal Government. It shall be the policy of this Administration to protect religious freedom.

Sec. 3 Religious Freedom Principles and Policymaking Criteria. All executive branch departments and agencies (“agencies”) shall, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, adhere to the following principles and criteria when formulating and implementing regulations, actions, or policies:

(a) Religious freedom is not confined to religious organizations or limited to religious exercise that takes place in houses of worship or the home. It is guaranteed to persons of all faiths and extends to all activities of life.

(b) Persons and organizations do not forfeit their religious freedom when providing social services, education, or healthcare; earning a living, seeking a job, or employing others; receiving government grants or contracts: or otherwise participating in the marketplace, the public square, or interfacing with Federal, State or local governments.

Sec. 4. Specific agency Responsibilities to Avoid Potential Violation of Religious Freedom.

(a) The Secretaries of Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury shall immediately issue an interim final rule that exempts from the preventative-care mandate set forth in 42 U.S.C. 300gg-13(a)(4) all persons and religious organizations that object to complying with the mandate for religious or moral reasons.

(b) The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall take appropriate actions, through mechanisms to ensure compliance with existing statutory and other protections, if necessary, to ensure that any individuals purchasing health insurance in the individual market (whether through a federally facilitated exchange, a state-sponsored health insurance exchange, or otherwise) has the ability to purchase health insurance that does not provide coverage for abortion and does not subsidize plans that do provide such coverage.

(c) The Secretary of Health and human Services shall take all appropriate actions to ensure that the Federal Government shall not discriminate or take any adverse action against a religious organization that provides federally-funded child-welfare services, including promoting or providing adoption, foster, or family support services for children, or similar services, on the basis that the organization declines to provide , facilitate, or refer such services due to a conflict with the organization’s religious beliefs. The Secretary of Health and human Services shall, where authorized by law, promptly propose for notice and comment new regulations consistent with this policy.

(d) All agencies shall, with respect to any person, house of worship, or religious organization that is a recipient of or offeror for a Federal Government contract, subcontract, grant, purchase order, or cooperative agreement, provide protections and exceptions consistent with sections 702(a) and 703(e) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 20003-I(a) and 2000e-2(e)) and section 103(d) of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12113(d)). The Secretary of Labor shall, where authorized by law, promptly propose for notice and comment new regulations consistent with this policy.

News bits: Starting the new year with a bang!

Let the banging commence!

From the Lying Liar Files: Those transcripts and tax returns the Democrats released are a veritable gold mine of nasty stuff. Out of curiosity, my wife, a trained tax preparation person, looked briefly at his tax returns. After just a couple of minutes she looked up from her computer and said, and I paraphrase:

  

“He cheated on his taxes! He cheated a lot!! He can’t do that.”

Welllllp, he did do that. Meanwhile, we all recall Trump proudly telling us all how rich he was and would donate his salary to charity. Welllllp, he did not do that, at least in 2020. The Independent reports:

Trump tax returns dispute White House claim that he donated salary during Covid

Despite his spokeswoman’s claim, returns show he donated nothing to charity in 2020

Donald Trump donated nothing to the Department of Health and Human Services during the height of the pandemic, despite claiming publicly to have done so, his tax returns revealed on Friday.

Trump is not pleased with any of this airing of the dirty laundry business according to The Hill:

“The Democrats should have never done it, the Supreme Court should have never approved it, and it’s going to lead to horrible things for so many people. The great USA divide will now grow far worse,” Trump said in a statement issued shortly after House Democrats released six years of his personal and business tax returns.

“The ‘Trump’ tax returns once again show how proudly successful I have been and how I have been able to use depreciation and various other tax deductions as an incentive for creating thousands of jobs and magnificent structures and enterprises,” he continued [lying].

 His tax returns show he is a business failure and a felon tax cheat. What a colossal liar. 

------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------

In other news, from the Failed Rule of Law Files, the WaPo writes:

Mark Meadows, who was chief of staff to President Donald Trump, will not be charged for voter fraud related to his 2020 registration and absentee vote in North Carolina, the state’s chief law enforcement official [Attorney General Josh Stein, a Democrat] announced Friday.

Meadows is “explicitly excepted from certain residency requirements as a result of his service to the federal government,” Stein added.

“The State Bureau of Investigation conducted an extensive investigation into the fraud allegations against Mr. and Mrs. Meadows concerning their registration and voting in the 2020 elections,” Stein said in a statement. “After a thorough review, my office has concluded that there is not sufficient evidence to bring charges against either of them in this matter.”

Once again, we see out two-tiered system of law at work protecting the rich and powerful. Even Democrats support and practice the two-tiered system. It is perfectly acceptable for Republicans to vote fraudulently and eliminate fair elections as much as possible. If Hillary or Hunter Biden had done the same thing that Meadows did, the howls of sanctimonious outrage from Christofascist Republicans would be deafening. But since Meadows is a prominent Republican Christofascist, there is no blow back from his fellow Republican Christofascists. 

------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------

From the Lying Liar Files again, The Guardian writes: 

The conservative activist Ginni Thomas has “no memory” of what she discussed with her husband, the supreme court justice Clarence Thomas, during the heat of the battle to overturn the 2020 presidential election, according to congressional testimony released on Friday.

Thomas, 65, recalled “an emotional time” in which her mood was lifted by her husband and Mark Meadows, then Donald Trump’s chief of staff, a transcript of her deposition with the congressional committee investigating the January 6 attack on the US Capitol showed.

Thomas has been a prominent backer of Trump’s lies that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him.

The January 6 committee spent months seeking an interview with Ginni Thomas, who was known to have texted Meadows and contacted officials in Arizona and Wisconsin in the aftermath of Trump’s election defeat by Joe Biden. She was eventually interviewed behind closed doors on 29 September.

In opening remarks, Thomas said she entered Republican politics long before meeting Clarence Thomas in 1986. She said her husband had never spoken to her about court cases – “it’s an ironclad rule in our house” – and was “uninterested in politics”.

Hm. Mrs. Thomas claims to have “no memory” of what she discussed with her husband, never discusses court cases and, while being a long-standing Republican activist, is “uninterested in politics”. Hm. I think she thinks we’re stupid.

The arrogance in those lies is about as insulting as lies can get. She and her Christofascist husband must think we are all incredibly stupid. Lies, what can one say? They’re just innocent, patriotic free speech when they come from Republican elites. 

------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------

From the Endless Abortion Wars Files the AP writes:

Cara Berg Raunick watched with bafflement as Indiana’s Republican legislators took less than two weeks to debate and pass an abortion ban that the governor signed quickly into law.

The women’s health nurse practitioner from Indianapolis was struck by just how frequently faith was cited in the arguments as reason to ban the medical practice. But Berg Raunick, who is Jewish, said those views go against her beliefs.

To her, a pregnant woman’s health and life is paramount, and she disagreed with legislators’ assertions that life begins at conception, calling that a “Christian definition.”

“That is a religious and values-based comment,” said Berg Raunick. “A fetus is potential life, and that is worthy of great respect and is not to be taken lightly, but it does not supersede the life and health of the mother, period.”

Arguments like this were central to an Indiana lawsuit filed in September against the state’s abortion ban, which is on hold amid multiple legal challenges. On Dec. 2, a judge ruled the ban violates the state’s religious freedom law, signed by then-Republican Gov. Mike Pence in 2015.

Critics of religious freedoms laws often argue they are used to discriminate against LGBTQ people and only protect a conservative Christian worldview. But following the U.S. Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade in June, religious abortion-rights supporters are using these laws to protect access to abortion and defend their beliefs.

So, anti-abortion laws grounded in Christianity are now being challenged on religious grounds. Good. That is as it should be. If God can be relied on to make abortion illegal, God can also be relied on to make it legal. That is just fair and balanced. And, it is what the pro-abortion Bible says.

Some biblical Bible truths:

Hosea 9:10-16: God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never be conceived (ooh, that perish in the womb thing sounds pro-abortion and that never be conceived thing sounds pro-contraception)

Matthew 24:19: Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: “Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing” (guess little babies and fetuses are SOL in terms of getting to heaven ☹️)

Deuteronomy 28:18, 53: God stated his punishments for disobedience, including “cursed shall be the fruit of your womb” and “you will eat the fruit of your womb” (hm, that cursed fruit thing does not sound like a sanctity-of-life claim, but the eating fruit thing does sound rather pro-cannibalism 🤨)

Happy new year! 🙃

News bits: How false news can spread, etc.

Happy New Year!

Partying hard, especially the one on the far right

Misinformation spreads: On a phone call yesterday, my sibling mentioned an article by a car site called motorious. It commented in an article about mandatory kill switches to be sold in all new cars: 

According to an article written by former U.S. Representative Bob Barr, hidden away in the recently passed infrastructure bill, the very one I warned before would negatively impact drivers across the country if it were to pass, is a measure to install vehicle kill switches into every new car, truck, and SUV sold in this country.

The motorious article, which was also mentioned again here in a comment, pointed to the horrors of police and hackers being able to turn off a car’s engine for good or bad reasons. The story piqued my interest. I checked out the morotious article and it linked to an article that the fascist, propaganda source Daily Caller had posted (fact and bias rating here). As we all recall, in congress Bob Barr was a Christofascist jackass and shameless liar. Following up, I found that the highly reputable AP wrote this about the kill switch story:

CLAIM: President Joe Biden signed a bill that will give law enforcement access to a “kill switch” that will be attached to ALL new cars in 2026.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. While the bipartisan infrastructure bill Biden signed last year requires advanced drunk and impaired driving technology to become standard equipment in new cars, experts say that technology doesn’t amount to a “kill switch,” and nothing in the bill gives law enforcement access to those systems.   

.... in the months since the law passed, some social media users have misrepresented the provision online, falsely claiming it will give police access to data collected by the technology or allow the government to shut down cars remotely.

“Joe Biden signed a bill that would give law enforcement access to a ‘kill switch’ that will be attached to ALL new cars in 2026,” read several posts shared widely on Twitter and Facebook.

Experts who have for years been involved in creating and studying impaired driving prevention technology say that those claims don’t accurately reflect what these tools do, nor what the law says.

The point here is obvious. One has got to take sensational information like this with a grain of salt. Content on the internet is chock full of liars, grifters, fascists, Christian Taliban zealots and the like, all of whom have a self-serving agenda, usually money and/or power. 

Yeah, maybe hackers will figure out how to shut a car down some day. And maybe in time, law enforcement will weasel its way in and try to get control of every car on the road. But we're not there yet. The shamelessly mendacious Christofascist right is using this to foment irrational fear and to slander Biden and Democrats in power generally.

From the It’s not a conflict of interest files: The NYT writes: “A Charity Tied to the Supreme Court  Offers Donors Access to the Justices. The Supreme Court Historical Society has raised more than $23 million in the last two decades, much of it from lawyers, corporations and special interests.” 

It’s not a conflict of interest. It’s just free speech.

Fossilized climate change denier retires from US Senate: 

Farewell To The Senate’s Biggest Climate Denier. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) leaves behind a legacy of climate disinformation, and a small army of pro-industry contrarians. 

Inhofe, 87, will retire in early January after nearly three decades in the Senate. He leaves behind a legacy of climate denial that might be laughable if it weren’t so embarrassing and dangerous. There are few members of Congress who have done more to sow public doubt about the mounting, deadly impacts of fossil fuel-driven planetary warming, or to block policies and regulations meant to confront the threat.

I recall Inhofe once saying that climate is God’s work, not something that humans can possibly ever affect. He was chairman of the Senate Environment Committee. The Republican Party, what can one say? Anti-inconvenient truth, anti-inconvenient science and anti-rationality, among some other bad things.

Simply 2023 Question

We experienced a turbulent year in 2022, and so we might feel inclined to say:

To put you all into the spirit for the new year, what exactly was SO awful about 2022? Let's see:

Russia Invades Ukraine

Robb Elementary School Shooting

Buffalo, New York Supermarket Shooting

Death of Pele

Queen of England Elizabeth II

Trucker Convoy Freedom Movement in Ottawa, Canada

6th Wave of Covid

Inflation 

The Republicans winning the House and Senate bigly. 

So, what was for YOU, yes YOU, the most egregious event of 2022? To bring some balance, what was for YOU the most hopeful event of 2022? Maybe how the Republicans swept the House and Senate?

Looking forward to 2023, are you hopeful it will be better, or pessimistic it will be worse, or about the same?

Oh Hell, I might as well say it: I am the optimist, it will be BETTER!! 

News bits: Oops, $240 million is missing from Trumplandia, etc.

The Independent reports: 

Don Jr admits he doesn’t know where $240m Trump fundraised to 

fight election results went in Jan 6 transcripts

Donald Trump Jr said that he did not know where the $240 million raised to fight his father’s 2020 presidential election loss went, according to transcripts released by the House select committee investigating the January 6 riot at the US Capitol.

Aw, c'mon Don Jr, you lil' joker. You and the rest of us know where it went. Don Sr grifted it from the flock and is using the proceeds to have fun with sex workers. . . . . Jeez, $240m will buy a lot of sex worker fun. 😍

Send cash, lots of cash!

The WaPo reports on Trump's released tax returns:

Trump — who broke with a decades-long tradition of presidential candidates and presidents by refusing to make his tax returns public — has for years falsely claimed that he could not release them while under “routine audit” by the IRS.

Last week, the Ways and Means Committee revealed that the IRS did not audit Trump’s returns during his first two years in office, despite a rule mandating such reviews, and never completed any audits while he served.

What a fibber. This is what the Republican Party fights tooth, claw and poison dagger to protect and shield from the public. Of course, if it was a prominent Democrat who did this, Republican howls of self-righteous moral outrage would break your eardrums.

Vox speculates on why massive fraud in COVID relief spending has not had much news impact:

.... pandemic fraud across three major relief programs could reach the $250 billion to $560 billion range (though no one really knows because the exact amount is difficult to estimate). The federal government approved about $5 trillion in total pandemic relief money ....

All of the above makes for a messy picture of political culpability. Republicans can’t frame this as a purely Democratic scandal when Trump signed the bill and was president while much of the theft happened. Democrats, for their part, helped craft the initial relief bill and extended it further under Biden. So that’s an incentive for both parties not to look too closely at what might have gone wrong.

Among Democrats, there’s likely a generalized fear that making too much about any fraud in government benefits will be used to discredit the use of government benefits to help people generally (harking back to the “welfare queen” attack from Ronald Reagan).

One would think, though, that it would be anti-spending Republicans who would typically make a big stink about an issue like this. And yet with the GOP increasingly fixated on the domestic culture war, the specifics of the pandemic relief fraud (money stolen by foreign hackers) don’t seem to fit too well with their current message.

This is evident in an amusing recent exchange on the pages of the Wall Street Journal. Rep. James Comer (R-KY), the incoming chair of the House Oversight Committee, wrote an op-ed on pandemic relief fraud, along with five other issues he plans to investigate. But his most specific concern was that some states and localities used pandemic relief funds for “electric buses and controversial ideologies.” In an earlier press release, his office claimed to find evidence that pandemic relief money funded “woke initiatives.”

American Enterprise Institute fellow Matt Weidinger responded to Comer’s op-ed with a letter to the Journal urging him to focus on the bigger fraud picture so it could be stopped from happening again. “Criminal gangs, including some based in Russia and China, used stolen identities to seize U.S. tax dollars on an industrial scale,” Weidinger wrote. This could be read as saying: Focus on the real issue, please, not just the culture war crap. We will see next year whether the GOP House majority listens.

No, the GOP House majority is not going to listen. It is fixated on culture war crap.

American politics at the federal level is a freaking trainwreck. Democrats are plausibly worried about the Welfare Queen myth, while Republicans continue to be trapped in their psychotic break from reality and competence called culture wars. 

However, criminals love the train wreck. They get to live long and prosper, as Spock might say.