News bits: Christian nationalist bigotry; Regarding the benefit of a doubt; Regarding the Great Replacement

CNN reports about a proposed, hyper aggressive anti-LGBQT law:

A newly proposed law in Missouri could charge teachers and counselors with a felony and require them to register as sex offenders if they’re found guilty of supporting transgender students who are socially transitioning.

Missouri state Rep. Jamie Gragg, a Republican, introduced HB 2885 last week. If passed and signed into law, the legislation would criminalize the act of “contributing to social transition” for anyone acting in an official capacity at their school, including providing informational or material support.

The proposed bill joins a string of anti-LGBTQ measures that have been filed in states across the US and comes amid a growing “parental rights” movement that seeks to empower parents to decide what can be taught in classrooms about gender, sexuality and race.  

In an interview with CNN affiliate KY3, Gragg said the goal of the bill is to “put the social learning development of our children back in the hands of the parents.”  

In 2023, at least 510 anti-LGBTQ bills were introduced in state legislatures, according to data from the American Civil Liberties Union. The organization is also tracking 478 bills in the 2024 legislative session that restrict LGBTQ rights.

This is another example of the deranged bigotry, hate and irrationality that drives the morally rotted American Christian nationalist (CN) wealth and power movement. By making it a felony to support transgender students, CN elites rely on God-approved brute force. It is not a sex offense (punishable by up to 4 years in the slammer for each felony conviction) to simply support transgender people. Many transgenders have a hard time of it depending on how accepting their families are, or are not. This proposed law is an example of hateful, authoritarian CN bigotry in action. 

Anecdote: Back in my high school days, the sister of my closest friend was lesbian. She was sweet, kind, respectful and shockingly intelligent. When she told her parents about it, her father flew into a rage, kicked her out of the house instantly and never spoke to her again. She was kicked to the curb and had to fend for herself from that moment. That is an example of “parental rights” in action. 

Take away all tax privileges for all religion in 

America, right now! 

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

A Salon article about the report by former special council Robert Hur raises the issue of who or what to believe when in doubt:

“Can’t make it up”: Experts say transcript shows special counsel Robert Hur “lied” about Biden

The full transcript undercuts Hur’s claims that Biden could not remember his son's death and had “poor” memory

The full transcript of President Joe Biden’s five-hour interview with special counsel Robert Hur’s investigators “paints a more nuanced portrait” of Biden’s memory than the special counsel’s report, according to The Washington Post, which noted that “Biden doesn’t come across as being as absent-minded as Hur has made him out to be.”

The transcript “could raise questions about Hur’s depiction of the 81-year-old president as having ‘significant limitations’ on his memory,” according to The Associated Press.

Hur in his report declined to charge Biden, arguing that it would be difficult to convince a jury to convict with a memory that the special counsel described as “faulty” and “poor,” noting that Biden could not recall when his son Beau died or when he served as vice president.

But Biden said exactly when his son died in the interview.

“What month did Beau die? Oh God, May 30,” Biden said. When two others in the room chimed in with the year, Biden asked, “Was it 2015 when he died?”  

“Frankly, when I was asked the question, I thought to myself, was it any of their damn business?” Biden said at a press conference last month.  

Attorney Andrew Laufer tweeted, “Hur lied. That’s really the only appropriate response.”

Several things in that quoted material indicate that Salon accords Hur the benefit of a doubt. For example, the article title put “lied” in quotes to soften the allegation, and stated that full transcript undercuts Hur’s claims, when the transcript contradicts Hur’s claims. To contradict means to assert the opposite of a statement, while undercut refers to weakening or hindering something.

Maybe Salon had to soft pedal its writing out of professionalism, giving Hur wiggle room to deny and deflect. But should known DJT supporters and MAGA partisans ever be given the benefit of any doubt? The public record is crystal clear that DJT, his partisans and the MAGA movement are all chronic liars (or deceived) and almost always acting in bad faith, usually tinged with malice.  

In my opinion, Hur, just like DJT and the MAGA movement, have earned distrust. They deserve no benefit of any doubt from people of good will who value democracy and truth. 

I think Hur is very likely a liar, ~97% confidence level.

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

Meidastouch News reports about where sentiment the TTKP (Trump Tyranny & Kleptocracy Party) and MAGA movement have toward the Great Replacement Theory, which was and will be a significant factor in the 2016, 2020 and 2024 elections:

“Is That Even Up For Debate?”— Lara Trump Embraces 

White Nationalist Great Replacement Theory

The racist conspiracy theory has been used by some to justify violence

A few days before becoming the RNC co-chair, Lara Trump went on Blaze host Alex Stein’s show. .... At a December Republican gala with Trump, Stein told racist and homophobic jokes implying jail time would make Black voters like Trump more and implied only “a homosexual” would take the COVID vaccine.

Stein [had a] conversation with Lara Trump about the Great Replacement Theory, which is a white nationalist belief that migrants are being imported to replace Europeans and white people in the United States:

Alex Stein: “I feel like Europe was kind of like the beta test. We saw what they were doing, and now it’s just, I mean, I don’t even know if Europe is recognizable anymore.”

Lara Trump: “According to friends of mine who live there or have moved from there it is not, most places. It’s like the wild, Wild West in a sense out there. It’s crazy.”

Stein: “Yeah, and then now that’s happening here in America. Do you think, this is kind of a tough question and this will be controversial, but the Great Replacement Theory, I think it’s real. I'll probably get in trouble for saying that. I don’t think it’s based on race, but I think they want immigrants to come here because they know that they’ll vote for them and, you know, democratic elections or at least vote for candidates that will give out free social services. So, for me, call me a conspiracy theorist, I don’t think it’s crazy to just let in millions of people in if you want to try to—”

Lara Trump: “Is that controversial? Is that even up for debate? Why else would you have a fully open border? Why else would you be letting people on the terror watch list just walk on in if you weren’t banking on at least the majority of the millions of people, I mean, they say it’s close to 10 million that we know of, it’s probably more like 15, if you weren’t banking on those people voting for you, why else would you repeal voter ID laws? Why would you do all this stuff if you weren’t banking on that?”

Demagoguing the Great Replacement Theory is a core bit of CN dogma and propaganda. 

Are Stein and Lara Trump credible? Or, is what they are saying, lies, based on deceit or bad faith, tinged with malice? In good faith, I accord both essentially no credibility, just like I accord Hur.

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

This excellent 12 minute video by Frontline about the allegedly stolen 2020 presidential election reminds us of some things we really need to be aware of to some extent. It keeps fresh and in context the authoritarian horror we face again in 2024.

Thanks to Freeze Peach for bringing this video to my attention.

ICYMI...

Explain this to me:

(by PrimalSoup)

The stigma of depression…

I see a lot of commercials on TV these days about depression, and medicine you can get to help stave it off.

I know I have mentioned this before here, but I have been taking generic Celexa (Citalopram) (10mgs per day), a medication for depression, for at least 25 years now, maybe longer.  

I was once overly sensitive about things I had absolutely no control over and that many would think was no big deal. I’d hear someone yelling at their kid and I’d have to leave the area, I couldn’t stand to be around it. I’d see a dead squirrel on the street and I’d start crying. It came to a point where I knew I needed to address it somehow.  I did so through medication. I’m in much better control of myself nowadays, I’d say thanks to that med.  If I go off of it, which I've tried, I get that "black cloud feeling" come over me again, after a few days.

I really have a great life, so it's nothing like that. It's the bigger world I'm talking about that can bring me down.

But I’ve got a question. Why is depression seen as a shortcoming?  I’d say it’s a rather normal thing, or should be.  Anyone who is not depressed about the state of the world is the one with the problem, IMO. 

Talk about the stigma of depression. 

• Are you ever depressed?  If yes, what have you done about it? 
• How do you deal with the cruelties and other evils of the world around you (e.g., ignore them, avoid them, pretend they’re not there, accept them and move on, find/get religion to lean on, don’t give a fuck about them...it’s not your problem, other)?

Give me some advice on the best way to deal with what I’d call “normal depression.” 

(by PrimalSoup)

News chunks: Microplastics are in us; The neuroscience of memory

The WaPo writes about the ubiquity of microplastics that are in all of us, apparently including human fetuses:

Humans, it became clear, were not only consuming small amounts of microplastics: They might also be breathing them in. Dick Vethaak’s team (VU Amsterdam) began looking for microplastics in the human body — in blood, organs, tissues. “The results were quite shocking,” he said.

Scientists have found microplastics — or their tinier cousins, nanoplastics — embedded in the human placenta, in blood, in the liver and in the heart and bowels. In one recent study, microplastics were found in every single one of 62 placentas studied; in another, they were found in every artery studied.

But even amid all this research, scientists still don’t have a clear sense of what these materials are doing to the human body. Microplastics could be making us more vulnerable to cancer, heart disease and kidney disease; they could be factors in Alzheimer’s disease or affecting fertility. At the moment, however, scientists just don’t know — and they are in a race against time. And as hundreds of millions of tons of plastics enter the environment every year, it’s a race they might be losing.

Then there are the chemical additives that help to make plastic flame-retardant, flexible or more easily degradable. In a 2021 study, researchers in Switzerland identified more than 10,000 chemicals used in the manufacture of plastic — of which over 2,400 were potentially “of concern” for human health. Plastics can also carry other chemicals not involved in their production: so-called “hitchhikers” absorbed onto plastics and later potentially released into the human body.

What very likely will come next is obvious. We have seen the same game plan play out over and over. Cigarettes, climate change and plastics recycling are examples of the propaganda wars that big businesses engage in when their profits are threatened due to human health and/or environmental damage become public concerns. 

Plastics makers will hire professional propagandists (“public relations” or liar companies). The professional liars will confidently tell the public that plastic products are safe and environmental and health concerns are alarmist, socialist hyperbole. They might even deny that microplastics even exist. 

On top of the coming propaganda onslaught to bamboozle and distract the public, the plastics polluter companies will mount a mass dark free speech war in the form of “campaign contributions.” In that war against truth, the polluters will hire lobbyists to purchase some key members of congress, state legislatures, governors and presidents. Soon, the bought politicians will be telling us that (1) plastics are safe, while confidently telling us that environmental and health concerns are alarmist, socialist deep state lies and hyperbole, and (2) the scientists and their research is flawed and a pack of alarmist, socialist deep state lies and hyperbole.

We have seen this exact game before. We will probably get to see it again soon. ☠️

In other plastics news, a WaPo article playfully muses, artificial turf fields may have ‘forever chemicals.’ Should kids be playing on them?:

PFAS — which stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — are used in a vast variety of products and have been dubbed “forever chemicals” because of their ability to persist in the environment for years. They keep food from sticking to pans, make raincoats and backpacks water-repellent and help carpets resist stains. And they can also be used to manufacture the plastic blades of grass in artificial turf.

Test results from the San Diego soccer kids experiment found that two of the three players — including Salar Parvini’s daughter, Emma — came off the turf field with higher amounts of PFAS on their hands than at the beginning of the practice. So did Parvini. When the players practiced on natural grass, the results were mixed: Two of them had a decrease in PFAS, while Parvini was found to have more PFAS on his hands. (The new soccer balls also had detectable amounts of PFAS before they were used on both fields.) 

In an email, Melanie Taylor, the president and chief executive of the Synthetic Turf Council (STC), a trade association for the industry, pointed to the tests showing the presence of PFAS in soil. She said that companies are looking for a standardized testing method to guarantee their turf products aren’t made with PFAS.

“STC has worked with its members to ensure their products contain no intentionally added PFAS constituents,” Taylor said.

Pipe dreaming: I really want regime change for this country. My regime change vision does not include power in the hands of either major political party in the US today. Those two have failed and betrayed us.

Nonexistent bits of microplastics 

(TV ad: They are a healthy pre-biotic source of fiber!)

__________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________

The NYT published an opinion by Dr. Charan Ranganath, professor of psychology and neuroscience and the director of the Dynamic Memory Lab at the University of California, Davis. He asserts that memory is not mostly for recalling the past. It is mostly for telling us about the present and near future. Ranganath writes:

I’m a Neuroscientist. We’re Thinking About Biden’s

Memory and Age in the Wrong Way.

As an expert on memory, I can assure you that everyone forgets. In fact, most of the details of our lives — the people we meet, the things we do and the places we go — will inevitably be reduced to memories that capture only a small fraction of those experiences.

It is normal to be more forgetful as you get older. Generally, memory functions begin to decline in our 30s and continue to fade into old age. However, age in and of itself doesn’t indicate the presence of memory deficits that would affect an individual’s ability to perform in a demanding leadership role. And an apparent memory lapse may or may not be consequential, depending on the reasons it occurred.

There is forgetting, and there is Forgetting. If you’re over the age of 40, you’ve most likely experienced the frustration of trying to grasp that slippery word on the tip of your tongue. Colloquially, this might be described as forgetting, but most memory scientists would call this retrieval failure, meaning that the memory is there but we just can’t pull it up when we need it. On the other hand, Forgetting (with a capital F) is when a memory is seemingly lost or gone altogether. Inattentively conflating the names of the leaders of two countries would fall in the first category, whereas being unable to remember that you had ever met the president of Egypt would fall into the second.

Over the course of typical aging, we see changes in the functioning of the prefrontal cortex, a brain area that plays a starring role in many of our day-to-day memory successes and failures. These changes mean that as we get older, we tend to be more distractible and often struggle to pull up words or names we’re looking for. Remembering events takes longer, and it requires more effort, and we can’t catch errors as quickly as we used to. This translates to a lot more forgetting and a little more Forgetting.

The fact is that there is a huge degree of variability in cognitive aging. Age is, on average, associated with decreased memory, but studies that follow up the same person over several years have shown that although some older adults show precipitous declines over time, other super-agers remain as sharp as ever.

Mr. Biden is the same age as Harrison Ford, Paul McCartney and Martin Scorsese. He’s also a bit younger than Jane Fonda (86) and a lot younger than the Berkshire Hathaway C.E.O., Warren Buffett (93). All these individuals are considered to be at the top of their professions, and yet I would not be surprised if they are more forgetful and absent-minded than when they were younger. In other words, an individual’s age does not say anything definitive about the person’s cognitive status or where it will head in the near future.

I can’t speak to the cognitive status of any of the presidential candidates, but I can say that, rather than focus on candidates’ ages per se, we should consider whether they have the capabilities to do the job. Public perception of a person’s cognitive state is often determined by superficial factors, such as physical presence, confidence and verbal fluency, but these aren’t necessarily relevant to one’s capacity to make consequential decisions about the fate of this country. Memory is surely relevant, but other characteristics, such as knowledge of the relevant facts and emotion regulation — both of which are relatively preserved and might even improve with age — are likely to be of equal or greater importance.

Ultimately, we are due for a national conversation about what we should expect in terms of the cognitive and emotional health of our leaders.

And that should be informed by science, not politics.

In this fascinating 18 minute Amanpour & Co. interview, Ranganath talks about the function of memory to orient us to our situation in the present. He also talks about social or collective memory and its role in shaping memories. 

• I get a lot of letters from people saying you are telling me not to believe what I have seen with my own eyes. Yes, because you do not know what you are talking about.

• Obvious misinformation should be labeled as such because there is a significant cognitive load to recall if something seen previously was true or false. That aspect of mental ability declines with age. Memory bias tends to reinforce what we believe to be true, even when it is false.

News bits: Regarding Dem messaging: How MAGA does tax law; Privacy invasion alert!

A devastating NYT opinion, Democrats Need to Stop Playing Nice, opines & commentates:

Warren Christopher, a courtly former secretary of state, represents the Democratic candidate Al Gore. “The world is watching,” he intones. “We are theoretically its last great democracy. If we cannot resolve this in a way that is worthy of the office we seek, what kind of hope can we give other countries that wish to share our values?” James Baker, another former secretary of state, represents George W. Bush. He has a different theory of the case: “This is a street fight for the presidency of the United States.”

President Biden’s pugilistic State of the Union address last week may represent a new direction. But given the party’s recent history, the Democrats will probably need some CRISPR editing to their DNA.

Both Michael Dukakis and John Kerry were distressingly saintly in their presidential campaigns, failing to respond to Republican attack ads. Hillary Clinton endured a classic “Recount” moment in her second debate against Donald Trump. Mr. Trump stalked her around the stage. “He was literally breathing down my neck. My skin crawled,” Mrs. Clinton later wrote. “Do you stay calm, keep smiling and carry on,” she wondered. “Or do you turn, look him in the eye and say loudly and clearly, ‘Back up, you creep. Get away from me. I know you love to intimidate women, but you can’t intimidate me.” Throwing the haymaker might not have won the election, but Mrs. Clinton would have instantly changed the impression that she was a hapless, patronizing, liberal elitist.

Mr. Hur, a Republican, was appointed by the excessively dignified Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate President Biden’s alleged misuse of secret documents. Why a Republican? For the appearance of fairness, no doubt. So Mr. Hur took the opportunity to demolish Mr. Biden as a “well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.”

I can’t imagine that Republicans would ever hire a Democrat to investigate a president of their own. In fact, Republicans would be more likely to appoint a wartime consigliere, as Mr. Trump did when he brought in William Barr to help defend him against Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia inquiry.  

It might be educational for the American public to see how the bully responds to a rhetorical punch in the nose rather than to a lawsuit.

I agree with that opinion. Germaine approved.

__________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________

A NYT article describes how Bill Barr protected the giant company Caterpillar from paying most of $2 billion in unpaid taxes the company owed:

How Trump’s Justice Dept. Derailed an Investigation of a Major Company

The industrial giant Caterpillar hired William Barr and other lawyers to defuse a federal criminal investigation of alleged tax dodges

In December 2018, a team of federal law enforcement agents flew to Amsterdam to interview a witness in a yearslong criminal investigation into Caterpillar, which had avoided billions of dollars of income taxes by shifting profits to a Swiss subsidiary.

A few hours before the interview was set to begin, the agents were startled to hear that the Justice Department was telling them to cancel the long-planned meeting.

The interview was never rescheduled, and the investigation would limp along for another few years before culminating, in late 2022, with a victory for Caterpillar. The Internal Revenue Service told the giant industrial company to pay less than a quarter of the back taxes the government once claimed that Caterpillar owed and did not impose any penalties. The criminal investigation was closed without charges being filed — and even without agents having the chance to review records seized from the company.

In the months leading up to the canceled interview in the Netherlands, Caterpillar had enlisted a small group of well-connected lawyers to plead the company’s case. Chief among those was William P. Barr, who had served as attorney general in the George H.W. Bush administration.

Caterpillar’s attorneys met with senior federal officials, including the Justice Department’s top tax official, Richard Zuckerman, according to agency emails. The lawyers sharply criticized the conduct of one of the agents working on the Caterpillar case and questioned the legal basis for the investigation.

A week before the agents were to interview the witness in the Netherlands, President Donald J. Trump nominated Mr. Barr to return to the Justice Department as the next attorney general. Mr. Zuckerman then ordered the interview to be canceled and the inquiry halted, without getting input from the prosecutor overseeing the Caterpillar investigation, according to the emails.  

In September 2022, Caterpillar reached a settlement with the I.R.S., which assessed $490 million in taxes over a 10-year period, plus $250 million in interest. It was a fraction of the more than $2 billion in taxes that the agency previously said Caterpillar owed. (The $490 million included other issues in addition to the Swiss strategy at the heart of the investigation.) The company noted at the time that it “vigorously contested” the I.R.S.’s interpretation of the tax rules at issue.

If DJT gets re-elected, we can expect criminal corporate behavior like to this to skyrocket and donations to the DJT-controlled TTKP to also increase. Free speech in the form of donated piles of special interest cash to the TTKP will be high ROI investments.

TTKP: Trump Tyranny & Kleptocracy Party, formerly the Republican Party

__________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________

A NYT article describes car makers sharing driver data with insurance companies:

Automakers Are Sharing Consumers’ Driving Behavior With Insurance Companies

LexisNexis, which generates consumer risk profiles for the insurers, knew about every trip G.M. drivers had taken in their cars, including when they sped, braked too hard or accelerated rapidly

Kenn Dahl says he has always been a careful driver. The owner of a software company near Seattle, he drives a leased Chevrolet Bolt. He’s never been responsible for an accident.

So Mr. Dahl, 65, was surprised in 2022 when the cost of his car insurance jumped by 21 percent. Quotes from other insurance companies were also high. One insurance agent told him his LexisNexis report was a factor.

LexisNexis is a New York-based global data broker with a “Risk Solutions” division that caters to the auto insurance industry and has traditionally kept tabs on car accidents and tickets. Upon Mr. Dahl’s request, LexisNexis sent him a 258-page “consumer disclosure report,” which it must provide per the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

What it contained stunned him: more than 130 pages detailing each time he or his wife had driven the Bolt over the previous six months. It included the dates of 640 trips, their start and end times, the distance driven and an accounting of any speeding, hard braking or sharp accelerations. The only thing it didn’t have is where they had driven the car.  

“It felt like a betrayal,” Mr. Dahl said. “They’re taking information that I didn’t realize was going to be shared and screwing with our insurance.”  

General Motors is among the automakers and data brokers that have partnered to collect detailed driving data from millions of Americans. .... General Motors is not the only automaker sharing driving behavior. Kia, Subaru and Mitsubishi also contribute to the LexisNexis “Telematics Exchange,” a “portal for sharing consumer-approved connected car data with insurers.”

Credit...

That strikes me as a gigantic invasion of privacy. But, when profits at huge corporations are at stake, civil liberties that get in the way are ignored so that they do get in the way much or at all. It is just business. 

__________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________

Other bits:

How Big Pharma is fighting Biden’s program to lower seniors’ drug costs -- In court cases nationwide, drug companies are trying to block a new law that would cut prices on drugs for high blood pressure, heart disease, cancer and diabetes. In a flurry of lawsuits, these drugmakers have blasted the government initiative as unconstitutional, defended their pricing practices and warned that regulation could undermine future cures — even as millions of older Americans say they are struggling to afford essential treatments. The legal wrangling appears primed to reach the Supreme Court, which could carry lasting implications for the government’s ability to regulate health-care prices broadly.

PFAS chemicals to be phased out of food packaging. Here’s how to avoid them. -- The FDA said Wednesday that companies are phasing out the use of ‘forever chemicals’ in food packaging. 

The Food and Drug Administration announced Wednesday that companies are voluntarily phasing out the use of “forever chemicals” in food packaging, including fast-food wrappers, microwave popcorn bags and takeout containers that are grease-, oil- and water-resistant. The “major source of dietary exposure to PFAS from food packaging … is being eliminated,” Jim Jones, deputy commissioner for human foods, said in a news release. Consumers can be frustrated because there’s no simple way to test products for PFAS, and the chemicals aren’t included on ingredient lists. 

• Cut back on fast food (and greasy wrappers)
• Skip microwave popcorn
• Avoid nonstick cookware
• Store leftovers in glass containers
• Drink filtered or bottled water
• Check the source of the fish you eat

Jimmy Kimmel responded to DJT criticism live from the Oscars stage Sunday after DJT panned his hosting skills, cracking, “Isn’t it past your jail time?” (🤪 good humor)

__________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________

Orange-tufted spiderhunter

Trump mocks Biden’s (since childhood) stuttering affliction…

There you have it, folks: an example of a “not perfect, just forgiven” role model for the Christians (met with laughter).  IDGI. [SMH]

Want to try to explain it to me? Again.

(by PrimalSoup)